---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Gladson Dungdung <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2008/9/8
Subject: No respite by Gladson Dungdung
To:


  *Tehelka*
**
*No Respite*

*Poorly rehabilitated, adivasi families displaced by the Malay Dam in 1983
in Palamu of Jharkhand are now accused of encroaching on forest land*

*GLADSON DUNGDUNG*

The adivasis, mostly the victims of the development process in India, rarely
reap the benefits of it. The three buzz words – compensation, rehabilitation
and development—are widely propagated during the land acquisition for dams,
industries, mining companies, power plants and other development projects
but ground realities the displaced masses live with are different. The agony
of 56 Chero adivasi families who were displaced in 1983 during the
construction of Malay Dam, situated at Satbarwa block of Palamu district in
Jharkhand, discloses the truth of how the displaced struggle for survival
after being betrayed in the name of compensation, rehabilitation and
development.

These Adivasis had been living in Katautia and Dodang villages for
generations, now submerged by the reservoir of the Malay Dam. They had
adequate agricultural land, where they used to cultivate paddy, wheat,
mustard, pulse and vegetables for their consumption and the surpluses were
sold in the local market to meet other needs. 70 year-old Ganeshi who owned
29.85 acres of fertile land, received merely Rs. 36,000 as compensation and
became a daily wage labourer says, "My family members were never used to
earning livelihood from daily wages. We had more than enough land to sustain
our families for years." "None of 56 families had ever been labourers but we
were simply betrayed in the name of rehabilitation. Now we have only daily
wages as a major source to sustain our families," he added.

According to the Land Acquisition Act 1894, the affected families must be
served a notice prior to land acquisition. Here, the construction of dam was
initiated in 1980 without any information. The purpose of dam was to
irrigate approximately 65 thousand acres of land in three development blocks
– Satbarwa, Lesliganj and Daltonganj. The Adivasis were promised adequate
compensation for their land, government jobs to all 56 families and
rehabilitation with all facilities including hospital, school, drinking
water, paved road and electricity. Their village was supposed to be a model
for the district.
But even these promises did not convince the Adivasis to leave their
ancestral land. They resisted the displacement. According to 65 year-old
Budhan, their fight with the police with their traditional weapons including
bows and arrows continued till the dam was almost ready in 1983, when they
were asked to vacate the village. When they refused, the police arrived at
night, put them in trucks and were taken to the Land Acquisition Office in
Daltonganj and locked up. They were threatened with dire consequences if
attempted an escape. "Police told us if we agreed to vacate the village we
are safe. Otherwise our remaining goods would go under water," said Budhan.

Finally, the Adivasis were dumped in a new area and the village was named
"Kushikarma". They were compensated for their multi-cropping land at two
thousand per acre, plus the revenue from the rabbi harvest. All 56 families
were given plots in the hilly area for their houses. But merely 34 of them
were given government jobs as peons in the irrigation department, 22 of them
are still in the waiting list. Their struggle for livelihood began in their
new village situated in the hills, where only maize could be cultivated.
They started clearing trees and bushes for agriculture to sustain their
families, but the forest department termed them encroachers. They filed
cases against all 56 families alleging they were cutting trees and
encroaching on forest land. A few of them were put behind bars but escaped
after bribing the forest officials.

When Bhudhan cleared bushes to grow crops, he was thrown behind bars for a
year and is still not off the legal hook. He fears going to jail a second
time. The nightmare of displacement has stayed with him. He says, "We had
demanded that they shoot all 56 families rather than move us to some barren
land. This would have spared us of the pain of having to die everyday. The
local MLA Indarsingh Namdhari was for the dam. He had said that as long as
the Palamu farmers got water for their land, the submergence would not be a
cause for concern.

35 year-old Lalan was merely 10 years old when his family was asked to part
with their 21.62 acres of land, providing for their subsistence. Apart from
the monetary compensation package and the plot for the house, his brother
was given the job of the peon in the irrigation department. When the family
settled down at Kushikarma village, Lalan started clearing bushes and
prepared a few patches of land. But his desperate hunt for livelihood was
soon declared illegal. The case against him, again, for encroaching on
forest land was only withdrawn after bribing a forest department official.
The water from the Malay dam never reached to the proposed areas of
Lesliganj, where 10 Dalits families died of starvation in 2004. They were
agricultural labourers but did not get work due to drought. Ironically, the
canal from the dam passes close to the rehabilitated village "Kushikarma"
but never reaches them. If the displaced people had gotten water to irrigate
their barren land, they could have gone for two crops. Now, the male members
migrate to Punjab, Gujarat and Delhi in search of livelihood. Kushikarma
still does not have a school or a health centre.

Only 30 families remain in the village, others have migrated. A few of them
returned to the dam site where they at least get the opportunity to
cultivate the rabbi crop and fish in the reservoir. The state cabinet of
Jharkhand has passed the Resettlement and Rehabilitation Policy 2008, hailed
as a panacea for addressing the issue of displacement but this does not
cover the already rehabilitated. But, if the government cannot rehabilitate
a mere 56 families, how will they rehabilitate the masses? For the
'development' and displacements have only begun.

*Gladson Dungdung is a Human Rights Activist. He can be contacted at
[EMAIL PROTECTED]


 See articles on Adivasis's affairs visit to
www.indigenousindia.blogspot.com

 *Posted on Sep 05, 2008*



-- 
Bobby Kunhu http://community.eldis.org/myshkin/Blog/

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Green Youth Movement" group.
 To post to this group, send email to greenyouth@googlegroups.com
 To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
 For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/greenyouth?hl=en-GB
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to