I agree with Henry's opinion. The important thing is that one can obtain
what he needs, even if it's not the default output.
By the way: some manuscripts of XII c. has that strange stair-like sequence
of puncti, I needed to transcribe them recently and I just did what Henry
suggested: f!g!h!g!h!
I would argue that all the figures on the right are better
interpretations for those note sequences.
The podatus initio debilis (the first one) is more like the Solesmes
figure and is not easily confused with the liquescent clivis (what you
have as ge~). Compare -eg and ge~ in the old version
2 matches
Mail list logo
