Re: Gtk+ / DirectFb / Pango performance

2006-05-21 Thread Sean Kelley
Have you considered Gtk+ 2.6 for your embedded design? Instead of DIrectFB, which is rather rough around the edges, why not use a tinyx-server like kdrive? I am using it in a design on an XScale. On 5/17/06, Clif Swiggett [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi All - I'm hoping I can get some guidance

Gtk+ / DirectFb / Pango performance

2006-05-17 Thread Clif Swiggett
Hi All - I'm hoping I can get some guidance here. I'm cross compiling Gtk+ (latest CVS) to an ARM9 board. DirectFB performance is great - I can fill the screen with text using DirectFB font rendering and it appears instantaneous to a user. However, Gtk / pango font rendering is incredibly slow.