Re: iterate over a model and remove rows

2007-10-07 Thread Benoît Dejean
Le dimanche 07 octobre 2007 à 00:21 +0200, René Stadler a écrit : Am Freitag, den 05.10.2007, 19:48 +0200 schrieb Benoît Dejean: Hello, I'd like to know if it is safe to walk over a model and remove rows at the same time. I'm doing this in gnome-system-monitor in many places. Two

How to use the treeview column title style for a button?

2007-10-07 Thread Bastiaan Veelo
Hi, I am a style newbie. I want some of the buttons in my widget to look like the column title buttons in a treeview. How do I do that? Thanks, Bastiaan. ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org

calling functions defined in gtk's source file

2007-10-07 Thread Joël Krähemann
hello I want to call in my application functions like gtk_window_show, gtk_widget_real_show and others I've downloaded gtk source and the distributions patches however I get an linkage error undefined reference to gtk_window_show. I'm using make and it's file looks like $(AGS_DIR)ags:

Re: calling functions defined in gtk's source file

2007-10-07 Thread Yeti
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 03:15:57PM +0200, Joël Krähemann wrote: hello I want to call in my application functions like gtk_window_show, gtk_widget_real_show and others You cannot. These are private Gtk+ functions (you should have noticed they are delcared as static and therefore visible ony to

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-07 Thread Xan Lopez
On 10/7/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 6 okt 2007 kl. 19.41 skrev Christophe Dehais: Hi, For what it's worth, I like it a lot! I personally like it much better than a variant of the current skewed box. I wonder if I'm the only person alive that really likes the GTK+ box

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-07 Thread mmassonnet
On Sun, Oct 07, 2007 at 12:45:23PM +0300, Xan Lopez wrote: On 10/7/07, Mikael Hallendal [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 6 okt 2007 kl. 19.41 skrev Christophe Dehais: Hi, For what it's worth, I like it a lot! I personally like it much better than a variant of the current skewed box. I

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-07 Thread Salvatore De Paolis
On Sun, 7 Oct 2007 12:51:23 +0200 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The box *looks* awesome, it just needs some gradient or texture in it to give it the fashion trend you are looking for. I agree with the box too. It just needs to be updated to the 2.12. Imho, a complete change of the logo needs

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-07 Thread Cody Russell
On Sun, 2007-10-07 at 13:30 +0200, Christophe Dehais wrote: ok guys, one more cube here. again, no color, just to see how the shapes look like. feel free to bash the idea. I think the shapes look very nice. ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-07 Thread Christophe Dehais
On 10/7/07, Salvatore De Paolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Keep it as a joke, but this logo looks like a suppository:) true! I hope nobody will think we finally have the message of the toolkit :) Christophe S. ___ gtk-devel-list mailing list

Re: Logo (was Re: GTK+ Website Review)

2007-10-07 Thread Alberto Ruiz
2007/10/7, Christophe Dehais [EMAIL PROTECTED]: On 10/7/07, Salvatore De Paolis [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Keep it as a joke, but this logo looks like a suppository:) true! I hope nobody will think we finally have the message of the toolkit :) Have anyone seen this[0] one? I think it's a

gtk_show_help and gtk_show_url

2007-10-07 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, Sketching out an API here, prototype attached. See also http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-devel-list/2007-September/msg00139.html Some questions: - in current GNOME, what are the right parameters to open a help file? (i.e. what values does gtk_help_show() need to open a gnome help

Re: gtk_show_help and gtk_show_url

2007-10-07 Thread Wouter Bolsterlee
2007-10-07 klockan 23:10 skrev Havoc Pennington: 3) dlopen gnome-vfs and call its code for this Does not sound like a good idea since gnome-vfs is soon to be replaced by gio iirc... mvrgr, Wouter -- :wq mail [EMAIL PROTECTED]