On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 4:14 PM, Garth's KidStuff
[EMAIL PROTECTED]wrote:
Thanks for the reply!
the scrolledwindow but without results:
g_signal_connect(sw, key-press-event, (GCallback)eat_pageupdown,
NULL);
I just asked a very similar question a few days ago on the list and Murray
was
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Brian J. Tarricone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what he really meant (or if not, here's my take on it) was that NUL
bytes aren't *printable* text... like you'd say of low-value ASCII data.
Sure, it's technically text, but most of it isn't something you
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 21:52 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
In the future (3.0 maybe?) it would be cool if there was a Sequence
interface that container widgets could implement. That way it would be
more explicit how containers should be implemented. And other
list-like widgets could also
Hello,
After the CSS engine [1] has gained some traction -- at least in terms
of code -- I'd like to lay out a possible plan for theming in gtk3.
First up, some (well known) issues to consider:
(1) Suboptimal Theming in GTK [2]
(2) Themes are Evil! [3, 4]
(3) Lookalike widget/toolkit
Hi,
On Wed, 2008-10-08 at 11:36 +0200, Robert Staudinger wrote:
This should provide some insight on what I'm up to. Let me know what
you think, and maybe the Dublin hackfest can be used to bring things
on track.
there's another project called [1]Manju (also with code [2]available),
which
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 3:50 PM, Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
there's another project called [1]Manju (also with code [2]available),
which seems to use SVG instead of CSS. Could you comment on the
differences between these approaches, if you know them ?
Quoting from [1]:
The
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 13:20, Havoc Pennington [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Brian J. Tarricone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what he really meant (or if not, here's my take on it) was that NUL
bytes aren't *printable* text... like you'd say of low-value ASCII
Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
coda wrote:
I discussed this on #gtk+ with mathrick and pbor and it seems that the
assumption that UTF-8 strings are NUL-terminated and contain no NULs
runs pretty deep. A possible solution is to use modified UTF-8 (
Hi,
Am Donnerstag, den 09.10.2008, 00:01 + schrieb Maciej Katafiasz:
Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
coda wrote:
Another possibility mentioned was making more use of GString.
Not a huge fan.
Why's that? GString is a very odd animal, we have it, it works
Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
Another possibility mentioned was making more use of GString.
Not a huge fan.
Why's that? GString is a very odd animal, we have it, it works fine and
is as good a string implementation and as compatible with char* as
possible within C, yet it seems to be used
2008/10/8 Xavier Bestel [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, 2008-10-07 at 21:52 +, BJörn Lindqvist wrote:
In the future (3.0 maybe?) it would be cool if there was a Sequence
interface that container widgets could implement. That way it would be
more explicit how containers should be implemented.
Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
Ugh. Why is that? Who knows? Matthias suggested that because a string
claiming to be length bytes long but terminating prematurely is not
valid. However, that statement assumes that string is nul-terminated.
Dan Winship wrote:
Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
Ugh. Why is that? Who knows? Matthias suggested that because a string
claiming to be length bytes long but terminating prematurely is not
valid. However, that statement assumes that string
Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Dan Winship wrote:
Maciej Katafiasz wrote:
Den Tue, 07 Oct 2008 16:55:29 -0400 skrev Behdad Esfahbod:
Ugh. Why is that? Who knows? Matthias suggested that because a string
claiming to be length bytes long but terminating prematurely is not
valid. However, that
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 5:50 PM, Brian J. Tarricone [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I think what he really meant (or if not, here's my take on it) was that NUL
bytes aren't *printable* text... like you'd say of low-value ASCII data.
Sure, it's technically text, but most
Hi,
On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 11:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lemme pull a real-world example: Last year I had to fix a bug in Firefox where
a page with a nul byte crashed the browser.
What I don't see is how a nul byte is in any way different from an
invalid sequence, other
16 matches
Mail list logo
