Paul LeoNerd Evans escribió:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:43:57 +0100
Martín Vales mar...@opengeomap.org wrote:
Other overhead i see is the open dir/file funtions, where in windows we
need do the utf8 to utf16 everytime in windows. If JAVA,.NET and Qt use
utf16 by default why in gnome world we
Martín Vales wrote:
I can see the advantages of use utf8 but the true it´s most of people
use utf16. I know gnome/linux/cairo/freedesktop promote utf8 but most
people use utf16:
http://unicode.org/notes/tn12/#Software_16
This is a very baseless claim. One that actually turns out to be false.
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Lets just say that
UTF-16 is at best implementation details of Firefox.
Well, JavaScript is notably UTF-16. Given that the Web, Java and .NET
(i.e. all the most important platforms) are all UTF-16 it's likely to
be with
Hi
I am currently developping a model browser for a car crash application.
I am using GTK2.12 to populate all the objects that are in my car crash
model.
For this I used the standard GtkTreeModel / GtkTreeStore design pattern.
When the model is becoming really big (more than 250 000 objets
Colin Walters escribió:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Lets just say that
UTF-16 is at best implementation details of Firefox.
Well, JavaScript is notably UTF-16. Given that the Web, Java and .NET
(i.e. all the most important platforms) are
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 18:30 +0100, Martín Vales wrote:
Colin Walters escribió:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Lets just say that
UTF-16 is at best implementation details of Firefox.
Well, JavaScript is notably UTF-16. Given that
Martín Vales mar...@opengeomap.org writes:
Colin Walters escribió:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Lets just say that
UTF-16 is at best implementation details of Firefox.
Well, JavaScript is notably UTF-16. Given that the Web, Java and
hi:
Well - what do you mean? Having 2 functions - one reciving utf-16 and
one utf-8? To be honest - it doesn't make any sense to me (it would
create much mess, double the code, make programming errors easier...).
Converting? What's wrong with g_utf16_to_utf8?
I was talking about a full
Maciej Piechotka escribió:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 22:30 +0100, Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
hi:
Well - what do you mean? Having 2 functions - one reciving utf-16 and
one utf-8? To be honest - it doesn't make any sense to me (it would
create much mess, double the code, make
Maciej Piechotka escribió:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 22:49 +0100, Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
Maciej Piechotka escribió:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 22:30 +0100, Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
hi:
Well - what do you mean? Having 2 functions - one
Dominic Lachowicz escribió:
What is wrong with:
gchar* g_utf8_strncpy (gchar *dest,const gchar *src,gsize n);
That's one not needed as strncpy should work.
hehe i know but that function it really exist:
Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
Dominic Lachowicz escribió:
What is wrong with:
gchar* g_utf8_strncpy (gchar *dest,const gchar *src,gsize n);
That's one not needed as strncpy should work.
hehe i know but that function it really exist:
GTK+ 2.15.2 is now available for download at:
http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.15/
gtk+-2.15.2.tar.bz2 md5sum: 1c230eeb1bf24b69b480d0a35da34794
gtk+-2.15.2.tar.gz md5sum: 1e9d42fb6bdfb6752a82f6c3afc3b3e7
This is another development release leading up to GTK+ 2.16.
Notes:
* This
Am Montag, den 26.01.2009, 04:03 + schrieb Peter Clifton:
Hi,
I'm trying to write a subclass of GtkAccelLabel in order to override its
source for the accelerator string.
gEDA (GPL Electronic CAD) uses multi-key-press keyboard shortcuts which
are unfortunately incompatible with the
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:43:57 +0100
Martín Vales mar...@opengeomap.org wrote:
Other overhead i see is the open dir/file funtions, where in windows we
need do the utf8 to utf16 everytime in windows. If JAVA,.NET and Qt use
utf16 by default why in gnome world we use utf8 by default?.
Probably
On Mon, 19 Jan 2009 20:07:09 -0600
Federico Mena Quintero feder...@novell.com wrote:
I'm arguing for committing openSUSE's patch based on the following
unquestionable criteria:
Do you have any numbers on the glyph coverage of these two characters in
a variety of common fonts? Are either of
Paul LeoNerd Evans escribió:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:43:57 +0100
Martín Vales mar...@opengeomap.org wrote:
Other overhead i see is the open dir/file funtions, where in windows we
need do the utf8 to utf16 everytime in windows. If JAVA,.NET and Qt use
utf16 by default why in gnome world we
Am Montag, den 26.01.2009, 12:40 +0100 schrieb Martín Vales:
Paul LeoNerd Evans escribió:
On Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:43:57 +0100
Martín Vales mar...@opengeomap.org wrote:
Other overhead i see is the open dir/file funtions, where in windows we
need do the utf8 to utf16 everytime in
Martín Vales wrote:
I can see the advantages of use utf8 but the true it´s most of people
use utf16. I know gnome/linux/cairo/freedesktop promote utf8 but most
people use utf16:
http://unicode.org/notes/tn12/#Software_16
This is a very baseless claim. One that actually turns out to be false.
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 10:15 +0100, Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
Am Montag, den 26.01.2009, 04:03 + schrieb Peter Clifton:
Hi,
I'm trying to write a subclass of GtkAccelLabel in order to override its
source for the accelerator string.
gEDA (GPL Electronic CAD) uses multi-key-press
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Lets just say that
UTF-16 is at best implementation details of Firefox.
Well, JavaScript is notably UTF-16. Given that the Web, Java and .NET
(i.e. all the most important platforms) are all UTF-16 it's likely to
be with
Peter Clifton wrote:
The way GTK seems to have worked (from my past experience), is I /
others write patches, then they sit in Bugzilla and get ignored. I won't
pollute this reply with the list of examples, but I can think of
several. (Ok - only one patch was mine).
Peter, I understand your
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 00:59 -0500, Yu Feng wrote:
Hi Peter,
I agree with you to seal accel_string without any getter/setter sucks.
But some of my code may interest you. Look for class MenuLabel in the
following file to see its public interface:
Thanks for the suggestion. I did in fact do
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 09:59 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
The way GTK seems to have worked (from my past experience), is I /
others write patches, then they sit in Bugzilla and get ignored. I won't
pollute this reply with the list of examples, but I can think of
Colin Walters escribió:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Lets just say that
UTF-16 is at best implementation details of Firefox.
Well, JavaScript is notably UTF-16. Given that the Web, Java and .NET
(i.e. all the most important platforms) are
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 18:30 +0100, Martín Vales wrote:
Colin Walters escribió:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Lets just say that
UTF-16 is at best implementation details of Firefox.
Well, JavaScript is notably UTF-16. Given that
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 12:57:28PM -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 18:30 +0100, Martín Vales wrote:
Yes, i only talked about the overhead with utf8 outside of glib, only that.
Perhaps the only solution is add more suport to utf16 in glib with more
methods.
There's zero
Martín Vales mar...@opengeomap.org writes:
Colin Walters escribió:
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Lets just say that
UTF-16 is at best implementation details of Firefox.
Well, JavaScript is notably UTF-16. Given that the Web, Java and
hi:
Well - what do you mean? Having 2 functions - one reciving utf-16 and
one utf-8? To be honest - it doesn't make any sense to me (it would
create much mess, double the code, make programming errors easier...).
Converting? What's wrong with g_utf16_to_utf8?
I was talking about a full
Peter Clifton wrote:
If you want a workaround for now, just access the member as
GSEAL(member_name). I told them the GSEAL macro should use __line__, they
didn't listen :P.
Ok - didn't know I could do that. I had presumed the sealed members we
not available for prodding outside GTK's
Maciej Piechotka escribió:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 22:30 +0100, Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
hi:
Well - what do you mean? Having 2 functions - one reciving utf-16 and
one utf-8? To be honest - it doesn't make any sense to me (it would
create much mess, double the code, make
Maciej Piechotka escribió:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 22:49 +0100, Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
Maciej Piechotka escribió:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 22:30 +0100, Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
hi:
Well - what do you mean? Having 2 functions - one
What is wrong with:
gchar* g_utf8_strncpy (gchar *dest,const gchar *src,gsize n);
That's one not needed as strncpy should work.
hehe i know but that function it really exist:
http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/unstable/glib-Unicode-Manipulation.html#g-utf8-strncpy
It does make sense.
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 16:34 -0500, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Peter Clifton wrote:
If you want a workaround for now, just access the member as
GSEAL(member_name). I told them the GSEAL macro should use __line__, they
didn't listen :P.
Ok - didn't know I could do that. I had presumed the
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 22:09 +, Peter Clifton wrote:
I can't grep a single reference defining the GSEAL macro
in /usr/include, nor _g_seal__. Yet magically -DGSEAL_ENABLE makes the
code compilation break by hiding those members.
Am I being dumb...? What black magic is going on here?
Dominic Lachowicz escribió:
What is wrong with:
gchar* g_utf8_strncpy (gchar *dest,const gchar *src,gsize n);
That's one not needed as strncpy should work.
hehe i know but that function it really exist:
Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
Dominic Lachowicz escribió:
What is wrong with:
gchar* g_utf8_strncpy (gchar *dest,const gchar *src,gsize n);
That's one not needed as strncpy should work.
hehe i know but that function it really exist:
Glib/gtk is full of macros. I believe que a C compiler is the right place to
this kind of unsafe code. If i want create safe code i have c#,c++, JAVA, D
or VALA.
Using macros is the only way to ensure intermediate APIs don´t have any
overhead. Besides modern GUIs have support to understand
Maciej Piechotka escribió:
On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 23:48 +0100, Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
Dominic Lachowicz escribió:
What is wrong with:
gchar* g_utf8_strncpy (gchar *dest,const gchar *src,gsize n);
That's one not needed as strncpy should work.
Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
hummm.
Example:
If we have for example a DWG binary file we have for example 15000 utf16
strings. If i use glib i need make 15000 translations utf16/utf8 to use
the utf8 glib api. When i need save the file i need make other 15000
translations. There are thounsand
On Tue, 2009-01-27 at 00:19 +0100, Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
hummm.
Example:
If we have for example a DWG binary file we have for example 15000 utf16
strings. If i use glib i need make 15000 translations utf16/utf8 to use
the utf8 glib api. When i need save the file i need make other
Martin (OPENGeoMap) wrote:
I don´t want say we MUST add more support to glib. I only say most
software developers works with utf16 text and many of that people are
not fan of that encoding but they must use it in the 100% of the
source code.
Other than making a lot of noise, what are you
GTK+ 2.15.2 is now available for download at:
http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.15/
gtk+-2.15.2.tar.bz2 md5sum: 1c230eeb1bf24b69b480d0a35da34794
gtk+-2.15.2.tar.gz md5sum: 1e9d42fb6bdfb6752a82f6c3afc3b3e7
This is another development release leading up to GTK+ 2.16.
Notes:
* This
43 matches
Mail list logo
