Hello,
I use GtkUIManager and connect my main window on the 'post-activate' signal
to process the actions.
Sometimes the signal is sent twice.
My UIManager class:
http://code.google.com/p/valide/source/browse/trunk/libvalide/uimanager.vala
And the connection of the window:
Hi a had multiple problems building this widget but I always knew where to look
and I fixed them. But now I have a problem that I am truly clueless on how to
solve it. Let me explain. I am trying to develop a program which uses
Gstreamer, so I needed a video widget.
This widget should do the
I found where the second signal is emited, but I can't block the emission of
the signal with this code:
Gtk.ToggleAction a;
unowned SListGtk.Widget list
a = UIManager.get_instance ()
.get_action (view-start-page) as Gtk.ToggleAction;
list = a.get_proxies ();
foreach (Gtk.Widget proxy in
Hi, list.
Widgets in GtkNotebook doesn't receive GDK_VISIBILITY_NOTIFY events with state
GDK_VISIBILITY_FULLY_OBSCURED while its being deactivated on tabs switching.
However its receive events with state GDK_VISIBILITY_UNOBSCURED on activation.
Where is the catch?
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:30:38 +0300
Alexander b3n...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi, list.
Widgets in GtkNotebook doesn't receive GDK_VISIBILITY_NOTIFY events
with state GDK_VISIBILITY_FULLY_OBSCURED while its being
deactivated on tabs switching. However its receive events with
state
On Tuesday 24 March 2009, Chris Vine wrote:
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:30:38 +0300
Alexander b3n...@yandex.ru wrote:
Hi, list.
Widgets in GtkNotebook doesn't receive GDK_VISIBILITY_NOTIFY events
with state GDK_VISIBILITY_FULLY_OBSCURED while its being
deactivated on tabs switching.
On Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:49:13 +0300
Alexander b3n...@yandex.ru wrote:
[snip]
Thanks, GTK_WIDGET_VISIBLE() may help me. Is there any way to catch
event when widget is actualy hiding?
You could use the hide signal that GtkWidget objects emit.
Chris.
Yeah, I'd totally agree. But in the absence of an ability to change the
spec, it's best to try to make things work as well as they can within
the spec, no? It seems like some people are advocating well, today
everyone uses ext3, and there's no problem, so we shouldn't do this
Hi!
I think you don't understand the problem.
That might very well be the case. I had a look at the presentation that
Alex linked to in the initial post in this thread. But I would have
preferred a document that doesn't look at the issue from a database
developer point of view.
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:01 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
It seems wrong to work around broken file-systems on the application
level. That only takes away pressure from the file-system developers to
address the problem properly.
I don't disagree, but on the other hand. Users are
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:38 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
On Tue 2009-03-24 10:30:52, Alexander Larsson wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:01 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
It seems wrong to work around broken file-systems on the application
level. That only takes away pressure from the
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:38 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
One compromise we could make it to only fsync in the case we're actually
overwriting an existing file. This would mean that we don't risk
loosing
You should fsync just before doing rename, preferably in some special
way
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 11:09 +0100, Xavier Bestel wrote:
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 10:38 +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
One compromise we could make it to only fsync in the case we're
actually
overwriting an existing file. This would mean that we don't risk
loosing
You should
On Tue, 2009-03-24 at 01:43 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
I've meant to write this mail for a while. Now that 2.16 is released,
it is really overdue. Here are my thoughts on the next GTK+ cycle. I
think we should aim to release 2.18 around the next Guadec (this was
the original plan for 2.16,
On 03/24/2009 08:24 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
We'd also like to get GtkToolPallette in:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=567729
It would also be terrific to get the equivalent of GdlDockable and such.
Both Anjuta and Inskcape use that (albeit Inkscape forked it)
Hub
On 03/24/2009 08:24 AM, Murray Cumming wrote:
Other things are of course possible, depending on people signing up to
do the necessary work.
I like to review David's resolution-independence work and help land it.
I think it's long past time to get extended-layout in. I'll get someone
at
16 matches
Mail list logo
