Gtk and Netbeans

Hi everybody How can I configure gtk+ for netbeans. Thanks ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list

Re: Gtk and Netbeans

Hello I'm using the next tip: in console I write: pkg-config gtk+-2.0 --cflags -I/usr/include/gtk-2.0 -I/usr/lib/gtk-2.0/include -I/usr/include/atk-1.0 -I/usr/include/cairo -I/usr/include/pango-1.0 -I/usr/include/pixman-1 -I/usr/include/freetype2 -I/usr/include/libpng12 -I/usr/include/glib-2.0

Re: GTK+ web site [PATCH]

Am Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:38:12 -0700 schrieb Eugenia Loli-Queru el...@hotmail.com: excuse me if this wasn't intentional but I think your tone is inappropriate here. I didn't see anything wrong with my tone on my previous email! I don't understand why you saw it as hostile! [...] And if you

Re: GTK+ web site [PATCH]

Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Christian Dywan: Am Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:38:12 -0700 schrieb Eugenia Loli-Queru el...@hotmail.com: So, what about that link? :-) Here's a patch. I'm not quite sure who decides if we can change it back, but it's ready to go. I don't think we

Re: GTK+ web site [PATCH]

Le Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100, Sven Herzberg he...@gnome-de.org a écrit : Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Christian Dywan: Am Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:38:12 -0700 schrieb Eugenia Loli-Queru el...@hotmail.com: So, what about that link? :-) Here's a patch. I'm not quite

Re: GTK+ web site [PATCH]

Christian Dywan wrote: Am Sat, 28 Mar 2009 14:22:42 +0100 schrieb Mike Massonnet mmasson...@gmail.com: Le Sat, 28 Mar 2009 12:54:41 +0100, Sven Herzberg he...@gnome-de.org a écrit : Am Samstag, den 28.03.2009, 12:37 +0100 schrieb Christian Dywan: Am Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:38:12

gdk_X11_get_default_xdisplay intermittently returns bad Display pointer

I've got some python code in which I'm trying to use gdk_X11_get_default_xdisplay but it fails intermittently returning a bad pointer. I don't believe that this problem has anything to do with python. Have others experienced this and if so are there any workarounds? Is this a know issue? I'm

GtkLabel: angle and ellipsize are incompatible?

Dear List, I noticed this line in gtklabel.c: gtk_label_ensure_layout: ... if (angle != 0.0 !label-wrap !label-ellipsize ! label-select_info) { /* We rotate the standard singleton PangoContext for the widget, * depending on the fact that it's meant pretty much

Re: gdk_X11_get_default_xdisplay intermittently returns bad Display pointer

On Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:02:37 + Xavier Toth txt...@gmail.com wrote: I've got some python code in which I'm trying to use gdk_X11_get_default_xdisplay but it fails intermittently returning a bad pointer. I don't believe that this problem has anything to do with python. Have others

Re: GtkLabel: angle and ellipsize are incompatible?

On 03/28/2009 01:22 PM, Yu Feng wrote: Dear List, I noticed this line in gtklabel.c: gtk_label_ensure_layout: ... if (angle != 0.0 !label-wrap !label-ellipsize ! label-select_info) { /* We rotate the standard singleton PangoContext for the widget, * depending on

Re: [PATCH] RFC: adding a #define G_VALUE_INIT for initializing GValue on the stack

Hi, On Fri, 2009-03-27 at 15:45 -0400, Andrew Paprocki wrote: On Fri, Mar 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Andrew Paprocki and...@ishiboo.com wrote: I checked gvalue.h and I don't see a #define in there containing the proper initializer list for a GValue to prevent gcc warnings. Rather than

g_module_close() did not really unload the module ?

Hi, I did the following test: g_module_open() ... do something make sure g_module_open() success ... g_module_close() ... remove the .so file g_module_open() And I found the 2nd g_module_open() still success even the .so file is removed !!! It looks like the g_module_open() will cache the

Re: g_module_close() did not really unload the module ?

Sorry, the problem is in my application, not g_module_open(). I do g_module_open() for the same .so file twice ... KC On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 3:40 AM, Kuang-Chun Cheng kcch...@linuxdaq-labs.com wrote: Hi, I did the following test: g_module_open() ... do something make sure g_module_open()