Sorry. I've fix my problem. Thanks
2009/4/13 Paolo pra...@gmail.com
How can I apply gtk_toggle_button_get_active() function? I have a
radiomenuitem and the function needs a togglebutton
2009/4/13 donglongchao donglongc...@163.com
Hi,
Because they are in the same group,and if one is
you are always welcome.:-)
在2009-04-13，Paolo pra...@gmail.com 写道：
Sorry. I've fix my problem. Thanks
2009/4/13 Paolo pra...@gmail.com
How can I apply gtk_toggle_button_get_active() function? I have a radiomenuitem
and the function needs a togglebutton
2009/4/13 donglongchao
How can I apply gtk_toggle_button_get_active() function? I have a
radiomenuitem and the function needs a togglebutton
2009/4/13 donglongchao donglongc...@163.com
Hi,
Because they are in the same group,and if one is selected(or toggled),
then before it send a toggled signal,the other one
2009/4/13 Paolo pra...@gmail.com:
I'm drawing lines into GtkDrawingArea through gdk_draw_line function. The
results is good, but not enough. How can I increase the rendering?
Do you mean make it faster'? You could try:
- disable gtk's automatic double buffering
- try another X driver (there's
gdk_draw_line() is deprecated. Use cairo instead.
Regards,
Dov
2009/4/13 Paolo pra...@gmail.com
Hi!
I'm drawing lines into GtkDrawingArea through gdk_draw_line function. The
results is good, but not enough. How can I increase the rendering?
___
Slow or fast is obviously application dependent. The original poster didn't
complain about speed... The most important thing is never to send to the
rendering pipeline data that will not be shown. E.g. in a GIS system if you
are zoomed out you don't want to draw small features. And you don't want
The documentation for GdkWindow has a good example of how to do
translucent widgets.
http://library.gnome.org/devel/gdk/unstable/gdk-Windows.html#composited-window-example
Your attachments didn't go through, so I can't say what your doing
wrong. But if I had to guess, I would say you're
A. Walton pisze:
2009/4/12 A. Walton awal...@ubuntu.com:
...
gtk_window_set_title() is inside of gtk+ and won't need to change. The
macro is to prevent external applications from doing window-title =
whatever; and instead applications should (and will be forced to use)
Hi!
This page: http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de/utf-8/decoder/dfa/ claims to
have better (quicker and smaller?) utf8 decoder. Maybe it would be
worth to look at it?
BBD
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
Tor Lillqvist pisze:
So to protection is enable - must include gdkconfig.h.win32 in my
aplications?
Eek, no. Include gdkconfig.h. Including the normal GTK+ headers
already does that for you.
When building GTK+ for Windows with MSVC, gdkconfig.h.win32 is copied
to gdkconfig.h.
If
2009/4/9 Dan Winship d...@gnome.org:
Ryan Lortie wrote:
The type system, of course, is that of DBus.
I love your feedback. Please give it all to me.
I took at a look at GVariant from the perspective of could I make
libsoup's XML-RPC (and future JSON) code use GVariant instead of
GValue.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grzegorz Kuczyński a écrit :
Colomban Wendling pisze:
Ok I understand the idea, but... how work it? for example:
--- struct _GtkWindow { GtkBin bin;
gchar *GSEAL (title); --- void gtk_window_set_title
(GtkWindow
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Grzegorz Kuczyński a écrit :
A. Walton pisze:
2009/4/12 A. Walton awal...@ubuntu.com: ...
gtk_window_set_title() is inside of gtk+ and won't need to
change. The macro is to prevent external applications from doing
window-title = whatever; and
I am learning gtk+ version 2.12. Currently I am trying to implement icon
view, showing thumbnails with text labels. The code I used is as follows:
const char* list[] =
{
1,
2 ,
3,
4,
NULL
};
filename = gtk_file_chooser_get_filename
Hello. I am writin to tou to ask a few questions.
The first problem is how to disable icons on GtkButton? There is description
how to change spacing bewtween label nad the icon, but I can't find a solution
to disable icons at all.
The second question is how to change spacing between scroll and
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 7:45 AM, Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen
mikkel.kamst...@gmail.com wrote:
* I really hope there is room in GVariant for NULL values in some way
or other. Without a NULL it is hard to map stuff from an SQL DB
directly to the serialization format without nasty hacks. This
Colomban Wendling pisze:
Simply because access to window-title will not be possible any more,
as I explained in another mail.
- another mail:
No, AFAIK, GSEAL_ENABLE is not meant to be put in any GTK+ header,
only to be added by hand to your programs' compiling options (e.g.
-
From: Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen, Date: 13/04/2009 21:45, Wrote:
How about dropping GVariant data in a human readable form to a
file? I often find myself in the following scenario: I have data that
is really not well suited for GConf and can't fit in a GKeyFile, and I
also want to allow
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote:
GVariant has nullable (maybe) types which were a proposed extension to
DBus some time ago but never materialised. iirc, Havoc, you had a
favourable opinion of this extension but wasn't sure exactly how we'd handle
the
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 3:00 PM, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote:
- dictionary entries in GVariant can stand freely (ie: they are not
restricted to being contained in an array).
What does it mean if you have a free-floating dict entry? Are you
supposed to treat as a dict with one
Mikkel Kamstrup Erlandsen wrote:
I have been silently anticipating GVariant for a while now and I am
very happy to see it coming forth now. I am bit in the same camp as
Dan here... My primary interest is not necessarily passing GVariants
over DBus (although I would also love to do that), but
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Reading the gvariant and gbus source btw, this would be somewhat
misleading at the moment; gvariant's type system is a dbus superset,
and its serialization format is a proposed dbus v2 format that may
or may not ever get used by dbus. (One of the main barriers being that
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 at 15:56:36 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
It looked like you might allow non-string dict keys, was one I noticed.
Er, so does D-Bus... Telepathy uses a{uu} in at least one place.
I personally think D-Bus has about the right balance for what to allow as a
key in a dict (any
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Simon McVittie
simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 at 15:56:36 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
It looked like you might allow non-string dict keys, was one I noticed.
Er, so does D-Bus... Telepathy uses a{uu} in at least one place.
I
Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 4:32 PM, Simon McVittie
simon.mcvit...@collabora.co.uk wrote:
On Mon, 13 Apr 2009 at 15:56:36 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
It looked like you might allow non-string dict keys, was one I noticed.
Er, so does D-Bus... Telepathy uses a{uu}
On 04/13/2009 05:00 AM, Butrus Damaskus wrote:
Hi!
This page: http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de/utf-8/decoder/dfa/ claims to
have better (quicker and smaller?) utf8 decoder. Maybe it would be
worth to look at it?
Funny how he claims reduced complexity. That's definitely the most complex
UTF-8
26 matches
Mail list logo
