Hi,
I am sorry if this is not the right mailing list.
For given x and y co-ordinates is it possible to display a particular number
at that position? or in other words, is it possible to paint a number or
character on the screen at a given point?
Thanks in advance.
--
regards,
Nischal E Rao
GLib 2.24.0 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/glib/2.24
http://download.gnome.org/sources/glib/2.24
sha256 sums:
7b6aa2cf21e734a6092a711bf196b8d2ddc589b971f93337610c10fa4f23400d
glib-2.24.0.tar.bz2
579a668cef12e1db63ee15bbaccc2c9067aee095d85a5eafe4b9d8d4499febfc
On Sat, 2010-03-27 at 02:44 +0100, Benjamin Drung wrote:
Hi,
I am sending this mail to gtk-devel list to catch as many ideas and
opinions as possible, if you not already following bug #554172 [1].
Ubuntu has now a units policy [2] and I want to implement it, but I am
still not sure what
On 03/26/2010 05:43 PM, Daniel Elstner wrote:
Hi Behdad,
Am Freitag, den 26.03.2010, 13:25 -0400 schrieb Behdad Esfahbod:
* The construct borrowed from glibmm, as beautiful as it is, is WRONG for
6-byte-long UTF-8. It just doesn't work. We historically support those
sequences.
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.03.2010, 16:12 -0400 schrieb Behdad Esfahbod:
Err, you're right. My bad. It's still broken though since it doesn't check
that the fragment bytes all start with the bits 10. Missing error checking.
It is not meant to check for errors.
I think it is totally arbitrary
On 03/27/2010 04:27 PM, Daniel Elstner wrote:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.03.2010, 16:12 -0400 schrieb Behdad Esfahbod:
Err, you're right. My bad. It's still broken though since it doesn't check
that the fragment bytes all start with the bits 10. Missing error checking.
Looking at:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.03.2010, 16:51 -0400 schrieb Behdad Esfahbod:
On 03/27/2010 04:27 PM, Daniel Elstner wrote:
It is not meant to check for errors.
Good point.
I think it is totally arbitrary to handle some potential errors but not
others. And I think the current implementation
On 03/27/2010 05:21 PM, Daniel Elstner wrote:
Well, I assume that ints are at least 32 bit wide on any platform
supported by GLib. But if you meant to say that it would break with
larger ints, I don't see why. As long as the type is unsigned, it
should be fine.
If the utf8 byte has more
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.03.2010, 17:40 -0400 schrieb Behdad Esfahbod:
On 03/27/2010 05:21 PM, Daniel Elstner wrote:
Well, I assume that ints are at least 32 bit wide on any platform
supported by GLib. But if you meant to say that it would break with
larger ints, I don't see why. As long
On 03/27/2010 05:49 PM, Daniel Elstner wrote:
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.03.2010, 17:40 -0400 schrieb Behdad Esfahbod:
On 03/27/2010 05:21 PM, Daniel Elstner wrote:
Well, I assume that ints are at least 32 bit wide on any platform
supported by GLib. But if you meant to say that it would break
Hi,
Am Samstag, den 27.03.2010, 18:04 -0400 schrieb Behdad Esfahbod:
Sure, I wasn't referring to valid data. In valid UTF-8, there is no 5byte or
6byte sequences either.
True, but that was a post-hoc restriction imposed afterwards, when
Unicode was redefined as a 21-bit character set,
GLib 2.24.0 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/glib/2.24
http://download.gnome.org/sources/glib/2.24
sha256 sums:
7b6aa2cf21e734a6092a711bf196b8d2ddc589b971f93337610c10fa4f23400d
glib-2.24.0.tar.bz2
579a668cef12e1db63ee15bbaccc2c9067aee095d85a5eafe4b9d8d4499febfc
12 matches
Mail list logo