On Sat 2010-04-03 01:20:37, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
It is traditional term, and it is ambiguous these days. CoreDuo is Intel
*processor*.
So what? Intel might call it a processor today, a flux capacitor
tomorrow. It isn't like they would be known to choose one name for
The fact that biggest
Hi,
I'm starting a new project in Google code called libctrans.
libctrans is in charge of creating infraestructure for transaction oriented
programming in C (the nomenclature is invented), easifying error control.
You can find more info about it reading the documentation:
On 04/04/2010 11:22 AM, ENRIQUE ARIZON BENITO wrote:
I think people in charge of glib development could be interested in
integrating it with glib since I have found no equivalent.
Maybe you can explain in a paragraph what problem you are trying to address?
behdad
Regards,
Enrique
Hi!
And then the valid question is... should the api also count virtual
cpus from hyperthreading (aka smt?)?
BOTH should be available. If we're spinning up threads to perform some
processing, then we need to count those virtual cores. But if we're starting
a child program to perform
On 04/04/2010 03:34 PM, Pavel Machek wrote:
And then the valid question is... should the api also count virtual
cpus from hyperthreading (aka smt?)?
BOTH should be available. If we're spinning up threads to perform some
processing, then we need to count those virtual cores. But if
On Sun, Apr 4, 2010 at 5:35 PM, Mark Mielke m...@mark.mielke.cc wrote:
Optimally - both counts should be available. How many tasks can I run
simultaneously at near 100% CPU vs how many tasks can I run simultaneously
at any % of the CPU.
A task doing video encoding or anything that would
