Re: g_io_scheduler_job_send_to_mainloop in another thread

2010-08-25 Thread Ardhan Madras
Based on my review at gioscheduler.c, I assume that the g_io_scheduler_job_send_to_mainloop() can be called in another thread, notice that this function wait for job completion in the main loop (main thread), in this case blocking the calling thread. If you call

Re: Some questions about Gtk+3.0 2.90

2010-08-25 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
On Tue, 2010-08-24 at 22:44 -0700, Ardhan Madras wrote: Why the application need to move to GTK+ 3 which still in development progress? because after gtk+ 2.24 is released, in parallel with gtk+ 3.0 this December, the 2.x branch goes into deep maintainance mode: no further releases will be

Re: Some questions about Gtk+3.0 2.90

2010-08-25 Thread Ardhan Madras
Why the application need to move to GTK+ 3 which still in development progress? Ardhan --- eba...@gmail.com wrote: From: Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com To: gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Some questions about Gtk+3.0 2.90 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2010 13:28:25 +0100 On Mon,

Re: Colored Statusbar, ugly grip under win32

2010-08-25 Thread Arne Pagel
Ok, Version on my linux box: pkg-config --modversion gtk+-2.0 2.18.3 Version on win32 (ugli resize grip): gtk+-bundle_2.20.0-20100406_win32/components.list gettext-runtime-0.17-1 gettext-runtime-dev-0.17-1 glib_2.24.0-2_win32 glib-dev_2.24.0-2_win32 pkg-config_0.23-3_win32

Re: Colored Statusbar, ugly grip under win32

2010-08-25 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Version on win32 (ugli resize grip): And the versions with the non-ugly resize grip? --tml ___ gtk-app-devel-list mailing list gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list

Gtk DirectFB backend

2010-08-25 Thread Mike Emmel
I just got the message on all the bug reports that the DirectFB backend is being removed for 3.0. First you waited too long to do it. I'm glad its finally removed. I tried to do the build and they will come approach hoping that if a decent port was resurrected a community would form. Well they

Re: Gtk DirectFB backend

2010-08-25 Thread John Stowers
On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 6:59 PM, Mike Emmel mike.em...@gmail.com wrote: I just got the message on all the bug reports that the DirectFB backend is being removed for 3.0. First you waited too long to do it. I'm glad its finally removed. For Google, and those that find this thread brings bad

Re: Gtk DirectFB backend

2010-08-25 Thread Javier Jardón
2010/8/25 John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com: For Google, and those that find this thread brings bad news, I stumbled across a developers branch that gets Gtk+-2.20 working with DirectFB again. [1] http://mail.directfb.org/pipermail/directfb-dev/2010-May/005704.html [2]

Re: Gtk DirectFB backend

2010-08-25 Thread Mike Emmel
2010/8/25 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org: 2010/8/25 John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com: For Google, and those that find this thread brings bad news, I stumbled across a developers branch that gets Gtk+-2.20 working with DirectFB again. [1]

Re: [directfb-dev] Gtk DirectFB backend

2010-08-25 Thread Sven Neumann
On Wed, 2010-08-25 at 21:49 +0200, Lionel Landwerlin wrote: Hi, There is a bug report for this : https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=619468 I've always told you guys on the DirectFB list that you should notify me about fixes for the DirectFB backend. I don't have the time to actually