-20 at 10:37 +, Alberto Ruiz wrote:
2009/2/20 Maciej Piechotka uzytkown...@gmail.com:
Eugene Gorodinsky e.gorodin...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all
Since you guys are discussing the redesign of the gtk+ website, I'd
like to propose an idea that I have. I've seen quite a lot of comments
saying
on it, if all of that were put inside the
source code, it might be a little too much information. Regardles
though, I wouldn't mind helping out.
2009/2/20 Stefan Kost enso...@hora-obscura.de:
hi,
Maciej Piechotka schrieb:
Eugene Gorodinsky e.gorodin...@gmail.com writes:
Hi all
Since you guys
a program then turns
into HTML. Any proposal would require a way to keep the Wiki and the C
comments in-sync.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:28 AM, Eugene Gorodinsky
e.gorodin...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi all
Since you guys are discussing the redesign of the gtk+ website, I'd
like to propose an idea
domlachow...@gmail.com:
Yes. The most common example I can think of is when a function is deprecated.
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:52 AM, Eugene Gorodinsky
e.gorodin...@gmail.com wrote:
Have there been cases where documentation for some function was
changed after that function appeared
I haven't programmed much with gtk+, so forgive a noob if this is a silly
question. My first impression when I looked at the architecture (using
GObject etc.) was that this must take quite a bit of processing cycles and
memory. So my question is: is there any room for improvement by rethinking
the
Vala is a high level language which is translated to GObject and C, so
you are proposing to rewrite GObject using GObject.
Vala can be modified, since it is open source and all. I'm not sure if
that's feasible though, as I'm not familiar with it.
___
