On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:11 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 09:55 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
We could just unref the underlying object, but once the wrapping C++
object has been destroyed, the vfuncs (and default signal handlers) will
fall back to default C
El día 27 de septiembre de 2010 00:53, Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com
escribió:
Hi,
Hello,
2010/9/26 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org:
It returns a pointer to a GObject now
Shouldn't it just return a GtkAdjustment* ? returning GtkObject was
some weird legacy thing.
Patches filled here:
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Benjamin Otte wrote:
the GTK API docs have an ever-expanding migration guide...
GtkObject is gone
Is there any current documentation on how to use
gtk_adjustment_new? The doc for GTK+ 2.90.7 still says it returns
a pointer-to-GtkObject.
Allin Cottrell
Hi,
2010/9/26 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org:
It returns a pointer to a GObject now
Shouldn't it just return a GtkAdjustment* ? returning GtkObject was
some weird legacy thing.
Also, isn't gtkobject still there in master?
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/gtk/gtkobject.h
Havoc
2010/9/26 Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com:
Hi,
2010/9/26 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org:
It returns a pointer to a GObject now
Shouldn't it just return a GtkAdjustment* ? returning GtkObject was
some weird legacy thing.
Also, isn't gtkobject still there in master?