Re: GtkObject is gone (was GTK3 breakage)

2010-09-28 Thread Murray Cumming
On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 10:11 -0400, Owen Taylor wrote: On Tue, 2010-09-28 at 09:55 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: We could just unref the underlying object, but once the wrapping C++ object has been destroyed, the vfuncs (and default signal handlers) will fall back to default C

Re: GTK3 breakage

2010-09-27 Thread Javier Jardón
El día 27 de septiembre de 2010 00:53, Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com escribió: Hi, Hello, 2010/9/26 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org: It returns a pointer to a GObject now Shouldn't it just return a GtkAdjustment* ? returning GtkObject was some weird legacy thing. Patches filled here:

Re: GTK3 breakage

2010-09-26 Thread Allin Cottrell
On Sun, 26 Sep 2010, Benjamin Otte wrote: the GTK API docs have an ever-expanding migration guide... GtkObject is gone Is there any current documentation on how to use gtk_adjustment_new? The doc for GTK+ 2.90.7 still says it returns a pointer-to-GtkObject. Allin Cottrell

Re: GTK3 breakage

2010-09-26 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, 2010/9/26 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org: It returns a pointer to a GObject now Shouldn't it just return a GtkAdjustment* ? returning GtkObject was some weird legacy thing. Also, isn't gtkobject still there in master? http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/tree/gtk/gtkobject.h Havoc

Re: GTK3 breakage

2010-09-26 Thread Matthias Clasen
2010/9/26 Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com: Hi, 2010/9/26 Javier Jardón jjar...@gnome.org: It returns a pointer to a GObject now Shouldn't it just return a GtkAdjustment* ? returning GtkObject was some weird legacy thing. Also, isn't gtkobject still there in master?