On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
But since you bring it up, what is the official policy? Is it C89? Is it
published somewhere?
For GTK+, we're generally avoiding C++
On 16 December 2010 17:07, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
But since you bring it up, what is the official policy? Is it C89? Is it
On Thu, 2010-12-16 at 12:07 -0500, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
But since you bring it up, what is the official policy? Is it C89? Is it
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 12:44 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
then they should be removed. we don't use c99 in glib and gtk -- it's
been pointed out many times in many threads on this very mailing list.
Actually gtk3 currently fails with -std=c99 even due to some anonymous
unions
On Dec 16, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Okay well, I *think* you answered my question, which is that you want
the stack to build with c99.
No, but Emmanuele did: It should be c89. Gobject-introsopection has
On Thu, Dec 16, 2010 at 2:30 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
On Dec 16, 2010, at 9:47 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Okay well, I *think* you answered my question, which is that you want
the stack to build with c99.
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:35 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
One of the files in the new (to introspection) cmph directory, chd_ph.c,
includes an anonymous union which requires -std=gnu99 to compile. Is that OK?
This would have been better as a bug. However, if what you're
*really*
On Dec 15, 2010, at 9:21 AM, Colin Walters wrote:
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 1:35 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
One of the files in the new (to introspection) cmph directory, chd_ph.c,
includes an anonymous union which requires -std=gnu99 to compile. Is that OK?
This would have
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
But since you bring it up, what is the official policy? Is it C89? Is it
published somewhere?
For GTK+, we're generally avoiding C++ comments, since they cause
problems for the compilers that are used on win32. What other
On Dec 15, 2010, at 5:54 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
But since you bring it up, what is the official policy? Is it C89? Is it
published somewhere?
For GTK+, we're generally avoiding C++ comments, since they cause
One of the files in the new (to introspection) cmph directory, chd_ph.c,
includes an anonymous union which requires -std=gnu99 to compile. Is that OK?
Regards,
John Ralls
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
11 matches
Mail list logo
