Markus,
You're right, there was a typo. The correct one is :
-background-color: blue;
+background-color: gray;
BTW, I submitted it to Bugzilla before I saw your mail :
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=696171
As for colors, I chose gray because it's, at the same time,
- choose background using system settings for highlighted text (Display -
Appearance tab under Windows), and make font white.
The latter has my preference, though I have no idea how to implement this :-(.
I imagine that user preferences and accessibility options might also be relevant
here
Changed it to gray.
...
-background-c: gray;
+background-color: blue;
I find that this patch indicates a different information.
(Would you like to reorder the time sequence?)
Which colours do you really prefer for improved readability of the affected user
interface? (Is it necessary
Great job Andy ! I just applied your patch to 3.6.4 and it works perfectly.
Now that I know how it works, I corrected something else. GTK 3.6 new font
background used for GtkAssistant (deep blue) is unreadable in most cases.
Changed it to gray.
See before :
...and as I forgot to mentiom, push the patch upstream to 3.6 using
Bugzilla.
I'm doing things by the book, Jose ^^.
Regards,
Tarnyko
jose.ali...@gmail.com writes:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:45 AM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
That's nice. I will patch the 3.6.4 bundle to integrate the
On 3/15/2013 at 1:45 AM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
For the Spinner problem you noticed (they don't spin) : it's not a
Win32-specific bug. In fact, you can reproduce this on Linux by removing or
commenting the gtk-theme line in /etc/gtk-3.0/settings.ini (tested on
Ubuntu Raring).
This
You are so helpful, Martin. Yes you're right. Changing the .css files as you
suggested enabled spinners to spin again ; thanks for preventing me of
spenting hours in obscure code.
I prefer the Adwaita one, too.
For the GtkNotebook revert you suggested before (based on
Windows 7 Aero theme if I'm not too tired/blind? If that is the case, then its
strange, as I do not get similar results.
On 3/15/2013 at 2:26 PM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
You are so helpful, Martin. Yes you're right. Changing the .css files as you
suggested enabled spinners to spin again
On 2013-03-15 00:45, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
That's nice. I will patch the 3.6.4 bundle to integrate the fix, so
GtkNotebooks work again.
I added a patch to the bug report that should fix the tab position
issue. It's also available from git:
git://pileus.org/~andy/gtk win32
It does the
On 3/11/2013 at 6:22 PM, Andy Spencer andy753...@gmail.com wrote:
On 2013-03-11 17:20, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
Compared to 3.4.4:
- GtkNotebooks with a non-default oritation is broken
I opened a bug report for this issue a while back. I didn't realize
it worked in 3.4.4 though:
That's nice. I will patch the 3.6.4 bundle to integrate the fix, so
GtkNotebooks work again.
For the Spinner problem you noticed (they don't spin) : it's not a
Win32-specific bug. In fact, you can reproduce this on Linux by removing or
commenting the gtk-theme line in
On Fri, Mar 15, 2013 at 12:45 AM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
That's nice. I will patch the 3.6.4 bundle to integrate the fix, so
GtkNotebooks work again.
For the Spinner problem you noticed (they don't spin) : it's not a
Win32-specific bug.
AFAIK, there were plans to make a LTS release of
On 3/6/2013 at 3:07 PM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
3.6.4 is stable ? So the work I'm doing right now is going to be
worth it
^^. Thanks for the info, for the wiki thing too, I'm going to be back
soon
with some stuff.
Compared to 3.4.4:
- GtkNotebooks with a non-default oritation is
On 2013-03-11 17:20, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
Compared to 3.4.4:
- GtkNotebooks with a non-default oritation is broken
I opened a bug report for this issue a while back. I didn't realize
it worked in 3.4.4 though:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=691678
Taking a quick look at the
On 06/03/2013 23:34, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
Thanks, didn't know GTK+ used the odd/even versioning method, you
people are all really helpful !
Just out of curiosity - I'm assuming that when the minor number becomes
even, it probably doesn't stay even for very long. Suppose I wanted to
hi;
On 9 March 2013 11:22, John Emmas john...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
Thanks, didn't know GTK+ used the odd/even versioning method, you people
are all really helpful !
Just out of curiosity - I'm assuming that when the minor number becomes
even, it probably doesn't stay even for very long.
On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 09:45:40 -0300, Marcelo Caetano wrote:
I always worked with gtk2+ bundles in win32, yes, it was a big mess. but I
always shipped the dlls into my application directory instead system32
directory.
System32 is never the right place for GTK+ DLLs.
--
Jernej Simončič
Hi,
On 5 March 2013 11:32, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
OK, as a majority of people seem to be interested, here is what I will do :
1) Produce binaries of following GTK+3 versions :
- 3.4.1 stable (http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libgtk-3-0, Debian
Wheezy provides 3.4.2 so we are safe) ;
-
Hi Javier,
3.6.4 is stable ? So the work I'm doing right now is going to be worth it
^^. Thanks for the info, for the wiki thing too, I'm going to be back soon
with some stuff.
Regards,
Tarnyko
Javier Jardón writes:
Hi,
On 5 March 2013 11:32, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
OK, as a
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
3.6.4 is stable ? So the work I'm doing right now is going to be worth it
^^.
In 3.6.4, 3 is the major version number, 6 the minor version
number and 4 the micro or patch-level.
In GTK development, series with an even minor number (6 in
this
On 06/03/2013 14:06, Allin Cottrell wrote:
In GTK development, series with an even minor number (6 in this
case) are stable while those with an odd minor number are work in
progress.
That's really interesting Allin. I had no idea about the odd / even
thing but it's a great idea.
John
Thanks, didn't know GTK+ used the odd/even versioning method, you people are
all really helpful !
GTK+ 3.6.4 just finished compiling btw, creating the bundle right now.
Regards,
Tarnyko
Allin Cottrell writes:
On Wed, 6 Mar 2013, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
3.6.4 is stable ? So the
I always worked with gtk2+ bundles in win32, yes, it was a big mess. but I
always shipped the dlls into my application directory instead system32
directory.
compiling gtk+ in windows is almost a torture, (i've done it several times.)
oabuild barely works,
and many times I had to build all
As always, thank you for your work on this. I have been hoping for a
while that you, or someone else, would get the official builds going
again, so please keep at it :)
Unfortunately, there are still a few bugs in the windows and mac
backends that have keep me from switching my project to Gtk
It's very discouraging to see every one trying to step up and take part of
that being turned
down.
Its not just happening with the windows port, patches for the linux are being
ignored also.
this is an open source, under-funded, under-manned project. if you want to
change that, then finding
Hi Michael,
Years ago there were gtk runtime installers out and abotu and it was a
right mess. Some apps would find it and run, others wouldn't. A new
app would want to install a new runtime, and it would clobber the
existing install, breaking existing apps.
Good point here, I personally
Hi Chun-wei,
I'm quite glad to hear about the broadway progress on Windows
As for Broadway, my changes are far from original (were suggested by someone
on a list) but it makes it -at least- work on Win32. I just notice in didn't
put the source patch along with the binary, will correct that
On 13-03-04 05:37 PM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
Hey, maybe I've expressed myself badly. In fact I expected, maybe
wrongly, the original thread to be read prior to my message.
To be as simple as possible : I have a working GTK+3 Win32 build
environment (mingw-based) and binaries hanging around
Hi Andy,
I think it would be useful to continue to provide installers
If we just provide official .zip archives, for the .exe being available
somewhere else (even on a personal blog e.g.) would be quite confusing.
I bet some people will use it and start complaining to GTK core even if
it's
On Tue, 2013-03-05 at 11:20 +0100, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
Hi Andy,
I think it would be useful to continue to provide installers
[snip]
I think that discussion is a distraction. We really really need official
binaries, and an official way to recreate them.
An installer would be nice to
OK, as a majority of people seem to be interested, here is what I will do :
1) Produce binaries of following GTK+3 versions :
- 3.4.1 stable (http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libgtk-3-0, Debian
Wheezy provides 3.4.2 so we are safe) ;
- 3.6.4 development (last one).
2) Package them as .zip
To clarify the audience of the question in the subject line even
further, the current
core team per http://www.gtk.org/development.php is the following:
NameAffiliation
Matthias Clasen Red Hat
Behdad Esfahbod Google
Benjamin Otte Red Hat
Federico Mena Quintero Novell
hi;
On 5 March 2013 11:32, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
OK, as a majority of people seem to be interested, here is what I will do :
1) Produce binaries of following GTK+3 versions :
- 3.4.1 stable (http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libgtk-3-0, Debian
Wheezy provides 3.4.2 so we are safe) ;
-
On 05/03/13 11:50, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
hi;
On 5 March 2013 11:32, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
OK, as a majority of people seem to be interested, here is what I will do :
1) Produce binaries of following GTK+3 versions :
- 3.4.1 stable (http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/libgtk-3-0, Debian
hi;
you're operating under a bit of a misunderstanding, so I hope I can
clarify it for you: there is no way, for any of the people listed on
the website, to stop or prevent other developers to work on GTK on
different platforms. you also don't need any validation from any of
the people on that
You're welcome.
I have spoken to Dieter, he is definitely is a very nice person :-).
Cross-compilation environment is hard and long to setup, so won't focus of
that first. But I will provide Glade and ValaWinPKG (win32) and so we can do
proper testing.
Must go now, see you later.
On 3/5/2013 6:32 AM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
OK, as a majority of people seem to be interested, here is what I will do :
I would like to be included in that majority even if we might be
less than 50%.
1) Produce binaries of following GTK+3 versions :
I will definitely appreciate that. I
[...]
having the build scripts in git.gnome.org would also help minimize the
fragmentation; bonus point if build scripts allow cross-compilation
from a Linux host to a Windows build.
I think we should focus on cross compiling instead. In my experience
making sure the configure script of every
Hi folks,
The subject of this mail is taken from the corresponding thread on
gtk-list. The thread itself (a few days old) can be read here :
https://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-list/2013-February/msg00055.html
I think the question is relevant to gtk-devel.
In short, we are questioning the
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:56 PM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
Hi folks,
The subject of this mail is taken from the corresponding thread on
gtk-list. The thread itself (a few days old) can be read here :
/gtk3_build_system/
- http://www.tarnyko.net/en/?q=node/20
-- Forwarded message --
From: tarn...@tarnyko.net
To: gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
Cc: bal...@balintreczey.hu
Subject: Is GTK+ a cross-platform toolkit ?
Date: Tue, 05 Mar 2013 00:56:30 +0100
Hi folks,
The subject of this mail
On 03/04/2013 06:03 PM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
(We're speaking policy here, but to support my point in technical terms :
- my reusable GTK+3 build environment :
http://www.tarnyko.net/repo/gtk3_build_system/ ;
- sample bundle I have produced : http://www.tarnyko.net/en/?q=node/20)
So
Hi Tarnyko,
I'm quite glad to hear about the broadway progress on Windows, as that
had been brought up on this list some time ago. Is there any chance
whether you could post a bug report on your changes (or a link to them)
to the GDK/broadway sources so that they will build and run on
Michael Torrie skrev 2013-03-05 06:51:
On 03/04/2013 06:03 PM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
(We're speaking policy here, but to support my point in technical terms :
- my reusable GTK+3 build environment :
http://www.tarnyko.net/repo/gtk3_build_system/ ;
- sample bundle I have produced :
44 matches
Mail list logo
