Yeah, that was me. I've since stopped, and I'm talking with Tor
Lindqvist about how I could be more useful. He's suggesting I go through
the list of unloved patches and review them, which sounds fair enough.
Philip
On Sun, 2007-05-27 at 12:39 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On 3/15/07, Federico
Le lundi 26 mars 2007, à 14:12, Quim Gil a écrit :
On 3/14/07, Tim Janik wrote:
Hello Foundation Board.
Hello GTK+ team.
The Gtk+ project is in dire lack of new maintainers, mostly to review (...)
Thanks for this report, and actually thanks for the first report you
sent back in
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 21:25 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
Le lundi 26 mars 2007, à 14:12, Quim Gil a écrit :
On 3/14/07, Tim Janik wrote:
Hello Foundation Board.
Hello GTK+ team.
The Gtk+ project is in dire lack of new maintainers, mostly to review
(...)
Thanks for this
Hi Murray,
Le jeudi 29 mars 2007, à 23:27, Murray Cumming a écrit :
On Thu, 2007-03-29 at 21:25 +0200, Vincent Untz wrote:
I'm wondering if gtk-devel-list is the place where the discussion about
collaboration should be happening: I don't know if having a mix of
technical discussions and
On Tue, Mar 27, 2007, Behdad Esfahbod wrote:
Is there a way to check programatically (scripts/patch-command/etc)
that if a patch is applicable to be applied with p0 or p1?
patch --dry-run
[ And the preferred order to try patch level is probably 1 0 2; at
least that's what Debian tools do
On Tue, 2007-03-27 at 11:27 -0400, मयंक जैन (makuchaku) wrote:
On 3/16/07, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Your mission, should you decide to accept it, is to do this:
- Get the latest GTK+ from svn trunk.
- Go through each of the unreviewed patches and classify them
On 3/23/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setting bugs with outdated patches to needinfo may be a bit problematic
as the bugsquad team has a tendency to close needinfo bugs after some
time... Also they won't show in some default search queries.. Just
removing the patch keyword, or
On Fri, 2007-03-23 at 15:42 +0530, मयंक जैन (makuchaku) wrote:
On 3/23/07, Behdad Esfahbod [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Setting bugs with outdated patches to needinfo may be a bit problematic
as the bugsquad team has a tendency to close needinfo bugs after some
time... Also they won't show in
On 3/16/07, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Go through each of the unreviewed patches and classify them
informally:
- obsolete patch which does not apply as-is to the sources
(you can use patch --dry-run to test this easily without
screwing up
On Thu, 2007-03-22 at 12:25 -0400, मयंक जैन (makuchaku) wrote:
On 3/16/07, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- Go through each of the unreviewed patches and classify them
informally:
- obsolete patch which does not apply as-is to the sources
(you can use
El vie, 16-03-2007 a las 20:44 +0530, मयंक जैन (makuchaku) escribió:
Here's a task for you to get started. It will take you several days,
but hopefully it will be fun :)
Sure... onto it!
That's the spirit! :)
Federico
___
gtk-devel-list
On 3/16/07, Federico Mena Quintero [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
El jue, 15-03-2007 a las 14:20 +0530, मयंक जैन (makuchaku) escribió:
I would be happy to volunteer towards maintainence of GTK+.
Wow, thanks!
Here's a task for you to get started. It will take you several days,
but hopefully it
Hello Foundation Board.
The Gtk+ project is in dire lack of new maintainers, mostly to review
patches, so that bugs can be fixed and new features can be introduced.
We need suggestions for candidates, probably for particular sub-sections
of Gtk+. Ideally, these candidates would be employed to
quote who=Tim Janik
So for the foundation board, there are two things that can be done
to improve the current situation:
1) Please present the issue at hand (this email and the email linked
to above) to the advisory board members, to make sure the companies
involved are aware of the
14 matches
Mail list logo
