On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 5:21 AM, Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com wrote:
I haven't followed this in detail, but I see the new GtkWidget align and
margin-* properties and functions:
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk
+/commit/?id=474f80442a6f3cf72a3c3b9efc5a846e7664d758
So will things like
On 13.09.2010 04:50, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
I merged the main patch to master. I wrote docs (see attached) but did
not push them yet because I can't figure out how to actually document
a non-signal virtual function in a non-interface.
Yes, docuemnt is as part of the class structure.
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 6:21 AM, Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com wrote:
Something that occurred to me mid-bisect is that with Benjamin's
draw() work, it would probably be straightforward to write the
following test program:
* instantiate every widget type in GTK (or even various modes of
Hi,
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 6:44 AM, Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote:
Uh, you've found out about one of my secret projects. Actually, what
I'm aiming at is reftests (see
http://weblogs.mozillazine.org/roc/archives/2008/12/reftests.html for
a description). They are independant of font
On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 1:19 PM, Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi,
I pushed a widget-padding-2 branch which has everything cleaned up.
Both widget-padding and widget-padding-2 can be deleted once this is
merged.
(I can merge if you like or feel free. or let me know what else to
Hi,
I merged the main patch to master. I wrote docs (see attached) but did
not push them yet because I can't figure out how to actually document
a non-signal virtual function in a non-interface.
What I have here puts the text of the docs in the HTML but it doesn't
look nice. Does gtk-doc just not
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Turns out this is unrelated to your branch. I've bisected this to
Oops, I just burnt a hole in my lap bisecting this too. At least _one_
of those checkouts could have managed not to rebuild the whole tree...
On Sat, 2010-09-04 at 15:59 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Sep 4, 2010 at 1:40 PM, Thomas Wood t...@gnome.org wrote:
It might be worth re-using the CSS box model¹ nomenclature here to avoid
confusion. In the CSS box model:
* margin: extra spacing around the element,
Cool. So I'm inclined to search-and-replace the patch and make the properties:
margin-left
margin-right
margin-top
margin-bottom
margin /* sets all four at once */
I'll give it a couple more days though in case this turns out to be
controversial so I don't do too much busywork ;-)
Havoc
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 9:41 AM, Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com wrote:
Cool. So I'm inclined to search-and-replace the patch and make the properties:
margin-left
margin-right
margin-top
margin-bottom
margin /* sets all four at once */
I'll give it a couple more days though in case this
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=628828
has a patch ready for review.
Havoc
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Thu, 2010-09-02 at 19:58 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
And here are some of the 'layout' style properties:
I think we could add style props on GtkWidget that would modify the
padding on the widget (I don't know if they'd just replace the
programmer-set padding, or be an adjustment to
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Of course, this only handles the size_request side of things.
It would be up to individual containers to respect the h/v-align in
their size_allocate (basically replacing their current child
properties),
On Sun, 2010-08-29 at 19:02 -0400, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
Matthias's mention of padding props got me thinking about how this
could be mopped up (based shamelessly on what we did in HippoCanvas
and then BigBox)
I'm attaching a patch that I haven't even tried to compile (my jhbuild
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 12:24 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
Would it be better to have padding-start and padding-end,
rather than -left and -right, and have it do the right
thing in RTL locales? I've often wished CSS did it that
way, and GTK+ does do most things with start and
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
Well, all of the packing functions use start and end, but I
guess that's just to make the term orientation-neutral.
Looking through the docs, I do see properties like left-attach,
left-margin, and left-padding. So it
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:52 PM, Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com wrote:
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 1, 2010 at 2:03 PM, Shaun McCance sha...@gnome.org wrote:
Well, all of the packing functions use start and end, but I
guess that's just to make the term orientation-neutral.
Looking through the docs, I do
On 08/30/2010 01:02 AM, Havoc Pennington wrote:
In brief it adds to GtkWidget:
h-align, v-align = FILL, CENTER, START, END
padding-left,padding-right,padding-top, padding-bottom = int16
A small point to keep in mind when implementing something like that is
the scrollbar behaviour,
would
be to be smart about whether events on padding go to widgets, possibly
including a rule that the widget only gets padding events if the
padding is against a Fitt's edge.
These features all seem like elaborations of padding cleanup but I
do think a padding cleanup (and having padding generally
Hi,
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Havoc Pennington h...@pobox.com wrote:
2. supporting superclasses deriving from GtkWidget that want to add
more padding area stuff to their subclasses on top of what GtkWidget
already does. GtkMisc would be an example - maybe the only example?
I forgot
Looking at ClutterBoxLayout, they separate x and y fill, which may be
worth adding here.
void clutter_box_layout_pack
(ClutterBoxLayout*layout,
ClutterActor*actor,
gboolean
expand,
On 08/29/10 19:02, Havoc Pennington wrote:
- is it called padding or border (border is nice perhaps since it
contrasts with all the existing stuff called padding)
Why not copy the CSS box model to the extent that it's relevant?
behdad
___
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 08/29/10 19:02, Havoc Pennington wrote:
- is it called padding or border (border is nice perhaps since it
contrasts with all the existing stuff called padding)
Why not copy the CSS box model to the extent that
On 08/30/10 14:01, Havoc Pennington wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 1:26 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
On 08/29/10 19:02, Havoc Pennington wrote:
- is it called padding or border (border is nice perhaps since it
contrasts with all the existing stuff called padding)
Why
Hi,
On Mon, Aug 30, 2010 at 5:00 PM, Behdad Esfahbod beh...@behdad.org wrote:
Well, I was implicitly suggesting that we take all of CSS margin, border,
padding and then some.
I see. Yeah, that could be cool. I thought about it a little but you
have to figure out what background and border
Hi,
Matthias's mention of padding props got me thinking about how this
could be mopped up (based shamelessly on what we did in HippoCanvas
and then BigBox)
I'm attaching a patch that I haven't even tried to compile (my jhbuild
setup is kinda hosed, don't ask) illustrating what I might like to
26 matches
Mail list logo
