Re: Dropping 'fringe' pixbuf loaders

On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 01:20 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Mon, 2015-09-21 at 18:38 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 5:10 PM, Cosimo Cecchi > > wrote: > > > > > > On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 1:01 PM, Owen Taylor > > > wrote: >

Re: Dropping 'fringe' pixbuf loaders

Thanks for the feedback. So far, I've dropped wbmp, ras and pcx. I've left tga because Benjamin has a branch with a rewritten loader (hopefully more trustwrothy). I've left qtif because I wasn't sure if this format is important on OS X.. I've left ani because it is an example of adding animation

Re: Dropping 'fringe' pixbuf loaders

On Mon, Sep 21, 2015 at 11:28:17AM -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > After several rounds of fixing overflow and allocation failure issues in > various loaders this cycle, I'm reconsidering following the suggestion in > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=721372 > > wbmp, tga, ras, qtif,

Re: Dropping 'fringe' pixbuf loaders

On Tue, 2015-09-22 at 01:20 +0200, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > As for removing those loaders, I'd double-check whether GIMP has > native > support for those (not through a gdk-pixbuf loader), so that at least > some modicum of support is left for those, making it less likely that > we'll crash