On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 03:20:15PM -0700, Steve Splonskowski wrote:
Hello,
In an app we are working on we have some things that need to be done
when the app (or window since we only have one main window) is
deactivated. That is when the use switches to another application we
want to
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 03:37:23PM -0700, Steve Splonskowski wrote:
Sorry for the loose terminology (thankfully I am not from the Windows
world!).
I mean when the application looses focus (and is still running).
Then there is no problem at all. When a Window lose focus you just
register a
Hi All,
I am very new to GTK+ (started out yesterday). I am writing a simple
application which will show pictures one by one on button click.
Although I am able to get my first picture, the picture does not
change on click of the button (next or previous). The full code is as
below.
#include
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 06:23:50PM +0100, Daniel Leidert wrote:
Hi,
I would like to add some information to the About dialog of an
application. The About-dialog is created using gtk_show_about_dialog().
The About dialog is a very simple widget that is often used and
threrefor made as a
thanks,
but my questions was about GTK_TEXT_VIEW widget.!
I use this function to set rules hint property to a TREE_VIEW object.
gtk_tree_view_set_rules_hint (GtkTreeView *tree_view, gboolean setting);
but wath about a TEXT_VIEW? how can i do the same thing?
bye
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 3:12
Midhun A wrote:
Hi All,
I am very new to GTK+ (started out yesterday). I am writing a simple
application which will show pictures one by one on button click.
Although I am able to get my first picture, the picture does not
change on click of the button (next or previous). The full code is
2008/3/17, Eduardo M KALINOWSKI [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Use a GtkNotebook with the tabs hidden. It works perfectly for that purpose.
This is generally what I use, but for fun I want test implement this
feature from to GtkBin.
--
Nicolas Joseph
Responsable de la rubrique GTK+ de developpez.com
I'm trying to copypaste an image using the default clipboard. I'm
using pygtk and retrieving the image from the clipboard using
gtk.Clipboard.wait_for_image then later I try to set the selection
data pixbuf using gtk.SelectionData.set_pixbuf() with the data gotten
from wait_for_image but this
Hello again,
i have to apologize: the thing about the wrong window size was a very nasty
memory allocation thing:
a corrected malloc and the requisition data weren´t be overwritten... *sigh*
But another question still remains: The gtkmplayer widget allocation data gets
the right dimensions
Dear gtk-app-devel mailing list,
I'm not sure if this is a bug or an error on my part so I decided to put it
here and see what
you guys and gals think.
I have a program with a gtktreeview which includes a column that uses
gtkcellrendererprogress.
Using the new pulse property of the treeview
majid wrote:
thanks,
but my questions was about GTK_TEXT_VIEW widget.!
Oh, jeez. I should learn how to read!
I use this function to set rules hint property to a TREE_VIEW object.
gtk_tree_view_set_rules_hint (GtkTreeView *tree_view, gboolean setting);
but wath about a TEXT_VIEW? how can
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
is it possible to:
- create a GdkCursor
- position it in a GdtWindow
- BE able to DISASSOCIATE / ASSOCIATE it with the mouse
upon demand.
i.e. in other words, I want the 2nd cursor to be visible, and fixed
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
Is it possible to change the default gtk_file_chooser UI so that:
- an extra column is displayed, specifically the file's size ?
- the columns can be sorted by clicking on the column header ?
I've been all thru the
Hi,
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 12:42 +0200, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
GIMP will continue to link in libpng, libjpeg, and etc., so
that won't be affected by this regression.
Yep. GIMP needs all the information it can get, especially for JPEG,
where it needs to actually have a look at the
Am Montag, den 17.03.2008, 21:18 -0400 schrieb Dominic Lachowicz:
* The functions that enumerate GDI+'s loaders simply don't exist in
the 1.0 version of the GDI+ DLL. They may exist in the 1.1 DLL (which
is not re-distributable AFAIK), but that's only in Windows Vista, and
we know how great
This change would still break the thumbnailing system built into
libgimpthumb. This code uses the PNG module from gdk-pixbuf to load and
save thumbnails and it relies on the ability to read PNG text chunks
from PNG images and to set the PNG text chunk when creating PNG files.
Ah, thanks
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 21:03 +0100, ext ryan lortie wrote:
Hello.
After some talk at the Hackfest about it, I'm writing the list to
officially request that glib and GTK be moved to LGPL version 3 or
later.
IANAL and all, but here are a few points for consideration based on my
experience
(Unless there is some way to read and
write text chunks also through GDI+ after all.)
GDI+ does provide access to *some* tEXt chunks that it knows about a
priori. At least the Description chunk is available as
PropertyTagImageDescription and the Software chunk as
PropertyTagSoftwareUsed. But
hi
i tried using the offscreen patch, but has a doubt regarding pixmaps.
What i did is , added gtkentry as a child of gtkoffscreenBox widget.
And than tried setting event mask
Hi Tommi,
Am Dienstag, den 18.03.2008, 11:56 +0200 schrieb Tommi Komulainen:
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 21:03 +0100, ext ryan lortie wrote:
After some talk at the Hackfest about it, I'm writing the list to
officially request that glib and GTK be moved to LGPL version 3 or
later.
IANAL and
Does that really apply for the code you link to? Afaik, if a GPL
program uses an LGPL library, it doesn't relicense that library under
GPL too, it merely links to it, and leaves it up to the user to make
sure the library is available. If this would be the case, than it
wouldn't be possible for GPL
Ok, according to the matrix on
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility
it's indeed not allowed, although I don't really understand why.
On 3/18/08, Lieven van der Heide [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Does that really apply for the code you link to? Afaik, if a GPL
Windows API (and may be DirectX) is a special case, because you can't
write a Windows program without using it.
Le mardi 18 mars 2008 à 12:57 +0100, Lieven van der Heide a écrit :
Ok, according to the matrix on
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility
it's indeed
* There is no way that I know of to distinguish between a
metafile/vector format and a raster format, except maybe to try
loading everything as a metafile and see if something fails.
Hmm, there are the ImageCodecFlagsSupportBitmap and
ImageCodecFlagsSupportVector bits in the
Will cairo move away from libpng too?
If somebody just writes the code, I think it would be accepted to have
a configure-time choice to either use GDI+ or libpng on Windows. Dunno
what the Mozilla folks think.
--tml
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
Hi Tor,
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:26 PM, Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tentative patch at http://tml.pp.fi/gdip-in-gtk.diff . Comments, please.
A few things in io-gdip-utils.h need attention:
1) I redefined _() if it wasn't already defined. Instead, you probably
want to remove that
Hello Gtk+ developpers.
The gtk+2.12 (or similar versions) source tree,
contains the sub directories gtk/stock-icons{16,20,24,32,48}
with rich set of icons.
When building and installing it (using say, prefix=/home/local)
these icons (at least in my case) are _not_ installed.
My questions:
+
2) There seems to be no way to create a best guess valid
string. g_utf8_validate is nice and all, but if validation
fails I still need to create a valid string. Am I supposed
to use g_convert_with_fallback() from UTF-8 to UTF-8?
Very good point. I raised this here too:
Hi all,
Having studied the FSF licenses and their restrictions, I think
it would be reasonable to re-license GTK+ under the LGPLv3
(or later) + GPLv2 linking exception (or, alternatively, simply
multi-license it under LGPLv3 / GPLv2).
This method allows people to link GTK+ with any of the
Dear Sir
I am Sarahana, working in an embedded product concern based on linux, i wish
to have an utility to check the performance of both USB and Ethernet, thing
is that i have to cross compile the code for my device, if you have any such
open source utility, if not can you please suggest me to go
If this would be the case, than it
wouldn't be possible for GPL code to use something like the Windows
API or DirectX either.
And don't forget proprietary Unixes with proprietary C libraries. That
was after all the expected runtime for the original GPL programs (like
Emacs, gcc, bison, etc)
17 mar 2008 kl. 16.13 skrev Sarahana:
Hi,
This is the development mailing list for the GTK+ project, please stay
on topic.
Best Regards,
Mikael Hallendal
Dear Sir
I am Sarahana, working in an embedded product concern based on
linux, i wish to have an utility to check the performance
Quoting GPL 2:
»However, as a special exception, the source code distributed need not
include anything that is normally distributed (in either source or
binary form) with the major components (compiler, kernel, and so on) of
the operating system on which the executable runs, unless that component
On Sat, 2008-03-15 at 13:46 -0500, Xavier Toth wrote:
Thanks I'll look at the gnome-settings-daemon. A little background,
the problem I'm looking to address is the one related to MCS/MLS
policy in the SELinux world where you are copying and pasting between
windows of different contexts and or
Hi,
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 17:50 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
Load large spreadsheet, click select all, watch your eager clipboard
manager suck down lots and lots of data, probably in duplicates
converted to all possible data types the spreadsheet can convert to. And
this may happen even
Hi,
Right now, the Open with another application dialog lives in
nautilus/libnautilus-private/nautilus-open-with-dialog.[ch]. This
dialog uses the machinery in GIO's GAppInfo to figure out which apps can
be used to open a file of a certain MIME-type.
There's a long-standing annoyance in
El mar, 18-03-2008 a las 14:02 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero escribió:
Hi,
Right now, the Open with another application dialog lives in
nautilus/libnautilus-private/nautilus-open-with-dialog.[ch]. This
dialog uses the machinery in GIO's GAppInfo to figure out which apps can
be used to
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 14:02 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Hi,
Right now, the Open with another application dialog lives in
nautilus/libnautilus-private/nautilus-open-with-dialog.[ch]. This
dialog uses the machinery in GIO's GAppInfo to figure out which apps can
be used to open a
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 17:09 -0300, Claudio Saavedra wrote:
snip
What about the open with... menu items machinery? This is
reimplemented in more than one place (being eog and gthumb the examples
I recall at the moment).
Totem has one to open videos embedded in web pages with the movie player
On Tue, Mar 18, 2008 at 4:26 PM, Cosimo Cecchi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 14:02 -0600, Federico Mena Quintero wrote:
Hi,
Right now, the Open with another application dialog lives in
nautilus/libnautilus-private/nautilus-open-with-dialog.[ch]. This
dialog uses
Lieven van der Heide wrote:
Ok, according to the matrix on
http://www.fsf.org/licensing/licenses/gpl-faq.html#AllCompatibility
it's indeed not allowed, although I don't really understand why.
Mathias pointed out exactly why. It's not that linking GPLv2-only to
LGPLv3 violates the LGPLv3
Alexander Shaduri wrote:
Hi all,
Having studied the FSF licenses and their restrictions, I think
it would be reasonable to re-license GTK+ under the LGPLv3
(or later) + GPLv2 linking exception (or, alternatively, simply
multi-license it under LGPLv3 / GPLv2).
Hmm, there's a nifty idea.
On Sun, 2008-03-16 at 21:06 -0700, iluvlinux wrote:
i have a question regarding visibility-notify-event
If i add widgets to a container than i get the signal
visibility-notify-event, whenever visibility changes
but if i add widgets to a scrolledwindow i donot get visibility-notify-event
for
Alexander Shaduri wrote:
Hi all,
Having studied the FSF licenses and their restrictions, I think
it would be reasonable to re-license GTK+ under the LGPLv3
(or later) + GPLv2 linking exception (or, alternatively, simply
multi-license it under LGPLv3 / GPLv2).
But you can't do that. Gtk
Yevgen Muntyan wrote:
Alexander Shaduri wrote:
Hi all,
Having studied the FSF licenses and their restrictions, I think
it would be reasonable to re-license GTK+ under the LGPLv3
(or later) + GPLv2 linking exception (or, alternatively, simply
multi-license it under LGPLv3 / GPLv2).
Yevgen Muntyan [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Gtk is *LGPL*-2, so you can't make it GPL-2 (unless you
convince all contributors, including aliens and dead).
It appears that you have not read LGPLv2. Clause 3 explicitly
says that You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU
General Public
Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
Yevgen Muntyan wrote:
Alexander Shaduri wrote:
Hi all,
Having studied the FSF licenses and their restrictions, I think
it would be reasonable to re-license GTK+ under the LGPLv3
(or later) + GPLv2 linking exception (or, alternatively, simply
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 16:03 -0700, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public
License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. [...]
(If a newer version than version 2 of the ordinary GNU General Public
License has appeared,
Hubert Figuiere wrote:
On Tue, 2008-03-18 at 16:03 -0700, Brian J. Tarricone wrote:
You may opt to apply the terms of the ordinary GNU General Public
License instead of this License to a given copy of the Library. [...]
(If a newer version than version 2 of the ordinary GNU General Public
Tommi Komulainen wrote:
IANAL and all, but here are a few points for consideration based on my
experience after being exposed to Nokia legal machinery.
1. Changing the wording from version 2 or later to version 3 or
later will remove the 2 or later option. To my understanding
Jean Bréfort wrote:
Windows API (and may be DirectX) is a special case, because you can't
write a Windows program without using it.
It's not a special case. There is certainly no reference to the Windows
API in the GPL or the LGPL.
The only license that matters when it comes to deciding
2008/3/19, Mark Mielke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jean Bréfort wrote:
I can't see this thread going anywhere close to a conclusion, at this point
we should stop discussing about the hundreds of possible interpretations of
the licenses. Probably none of the people that has participated is a
lawyer,
On Mon, 2008-03-17 at 14:16 +0400, Alexander Shaduri wrote:
Hi all,
Having studied the FSF licenses and their restrictions, I think
it would be reasonable to re-license GTK+ under the LGPLv3
(or later) + GPLv2 linking exception (or, alternatively, simply
multi-license it under LGPLv3 /
53 matches
Mail list logo
