scrollwheel kind of widget

2005-03-08 Thread Magnus Bergman
A type of widget I'm missing in GTK is something like the scrollbar, but with no particular min/max values. This would be useful for scrolling a canvas with a virtually infinite size, and for zooming (and possibly other things). Irix (which uses something motif-like) has such a widget, see the

Re: scrollwheel kind of widget

2005-03-18 Thread Magnus Bergman
I have made some modifications to the Gtk*Ruler widgets to obtain similar goal, to incorporate in gnumexp[1] for selecting the area of a math function to view. I called it NxpRuler. So it looks just like a a normal gtk ruler, except that it highlights on mouse over, and you can drag it

Re: Linking glib with gld in Irix

2005-08-10 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005 14:48:25 -0500 Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Aug 08, 2005 at 03:41:19PM +0200, Magnus Bergman wrote: I have problems building glib (2.6.6) in Irix using GCC, gas and gld (no, I don't forget to use --with-gnu-ld). It fails then linking glib-genmarshal

Re: Linking glib with gld in Irix

2005-08-15 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 15:22:20 -0500 Albert Chin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, Aug 12, 2005 at 03:19:25PM +0200, Magnus Bergman wrote: That looked quite bad. But several Irix/mips issues has been fixed in GCC 4 I was told. The SGI compiler isn't without issues either. If I try to use

Re: Some Question about License

2005-11-07 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Sun, 6 Nov 2005 23:49:30 -0800 (PST) Zhan Zhaohua [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear: Our organization is planning a big project which is a Linux-Embedded system and will be sold as products in the market. Through our investigation, We want to use Gtk+ at our system. But when we

Re: Bug compiling GTK+ 2.8.15?

2006-03-15 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Tue, 14 Mar 2006 23:30:04 -0500 Samuel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi everybody, I was trying to compile gtk+ 2.8.15 according to the instructions at http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/gtk/gtk-building.html. It worked up to a certain point in the compilation of gtk, but it complained

Re: Deprecations

2006-04-27 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Thu, 27 Apr 2006 10:30:12 -0400 Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2006-04-26 at 09:22 +0100, Ross Burton wrote: Hi, Would it make sense to mark all of the deprecated API in GLib and GTK+ with G_GNUC_DEPRECATED, so that people who are not using the DISABLE_DEPRECATED

Problems making loaders for header-less images

2006-06-23 Thread Magnus Bergman
I've made a couple of gdk-pixbuf loaders for formats that cannot be finger printed using a pattern, because they totaly lack some kind of header or that information is located at the end of the file. This has causes me the following problems: * If one loader handles several (similar) formats that

Re: help me catch up on GTK gui tools

2006-08-08 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 22:18:48 -0600 Brett Stottlemyer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1) Older, stable versions of gtk/gtkglext/glade/mm's (binary package versions) a. Pro - stable, easy to install b. Con - Difficult to upgrade? Doesn't have newer features. 2) Stable

Re: Pluggable widget types and implementations

2006-11-28 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Tue, 28 Nov 2006 14:53:33 +0100 (CET) Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hey all, this is a proposal for allowing pluggable widget types and implementations, assorted bug report: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=356864 Platform and desktop customization needs, especially in

Re: undefined reference to `g_sequence_*'

2007-02-12 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Mon, 12 Feb 2007 01:00:56 +0200 Stefan Kost [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Argh, got it. I tried to be lazy and because it does not need new atk, I did not build a new atk and thus when linking to old atk it pulls in the old glib :( I'm probably too late to answer. But you actually don't need

Re: Application selection dialog

2007-02-21 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Wed, 14 Feb 2007 19:18:27 +0100 Marvin Raaijmakers [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I think that at the moment there is no nice way for the user to choose an application. GTK has a dialog for selecting files so why not add a dialog to GTK for selecting an application? Some application allow the

gdkpixbufloader-API shortcoming

2008-06-11 Thread Magnus Bergman
A small shortcoming in the gdkpixbufloader-API causes me trouble. The problem is this: Let's say my loader libpixbufloader-foobar can handle the two (very similar) formats image/x-foo and image/x-bar. Then an application identifies an image as either foo or bar it invokes my loader. But the

Re: pictures

2011-03-18 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 20:32:48 +0100 Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote: For now, I'm interested in high-level review of the idea. Things like This whole idea is stupid because ..., I would change the API so that ..., If you did this, we could also use it for ..., How do you intend to solve ...

gtk_theming_engine_get_border()

2013-12-12 Thread Magnus Bergman
This is really confusing me. I made a theme engine for GTK+ 3.0. But then upgrading GTK+ (to 3.2 I think it was) all borders disappeared. And nothing has changed since then so I decided to look into it. Apparently gtk_theming_engine_get_border() always return zero borders. But

An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-04 Thread Magnus Bergman
Over the years it has been discussed from time to time to replace gdk-pixbuf with something else[1][2]. Something was even in the making (I guess over ten years ago) but it never replaced gdk-pixbuf apparently. Now I don't even remember what it was called. And something else called pig was

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-05 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:28:22 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > Hi; > > On Tue, 4 Sep 2018 at 23:19, Magnus Bergman > wrote: > > > Over the years it has been discussed from time to time to replace > > gdk-pixbuf with something else[1][2]. Something was even in the &

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-05 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:47:57 -0400 Ray Strode wrote: > hi, > > On Tue, Sep 4, 2018, 6:19 PM Magnus Bergman > wrote: > > > Over the years it has been discussed from time to time to replace > > gdk-pixbuf with something else[1][2]. > > [...] > &g

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-06 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Thu, 6 Sep 2018 11:39:59 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 19:25, Magnus Bergman > wrote: > > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 17:28:22 +0100 > > Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > > > > > We're phasing out Cairo in favour of the CSS rendering model

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-08 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Thu, 06 Sep 2018 13:03:03 -0500 Federico Mena Quintero wrote: > On Wed, 2018-09-05 at 17:28 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi via gtk-devel-list > wrote: > > > In the near future, I'll very likely deprecate most of GdkPixbuf's > > API, except for the I/O operations; I'd also be happy to seal off > >

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-08 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Fri, 07 Sep 2018 12:51:32 +0200 Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Gegl is great for image editing. But not as much for simple > > > viewing. > > > > This is debatable. If I'm viewing a 4000x4000 RGB image on a hidpi > > display I'm already pushing gdk-pixbuf and cairo to their limits > > because

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-08 Thread Magnus Bergman
> On Wed, Sep 05, 2018 at 12:02:45AM +0200, Magnus Bergman wrote: > > Over the years it has been discussed from time to time to replace > > gdk-pixbuf with something else[1][2]. Something was even in the > > making (I guess over ten years ago) but it never replaced gdk-pixbuf &g

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-10 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 07:02:23 + Debarshi Ray wrote: > On Sun, Sep 09, 2018 at 02:57:30AM +0200, Magnus Bergman wrote: > > Many fields of science deal with images of multi > > gigabyte sizes. Ideally any image viewer should be able to handle > > these too with the right p

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-10 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:31:42 +0200 Bastien Nocera wrote: > > I've written loader for GIF that simply wraps abydos. In lines of > > code it's about a quarter the size of the current loader, even > > including > > the GIF plugin for abydos. It might even be slightly smaller with > > the whole of

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-10 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:07:27 +0200 Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 22:29 +0200, Magnus Bergman wrote: > > On Mon, 10 Sep 2018 11:31:42 +0200 > > Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > I do use a library (or two). I've written one plugin that uses > > gif

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-11 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 13:22:17 +0200 Bastien Nocera wrote: > On Tue, 2018-09-11 at 07:40 +0100, John Cupitt via gtk-devel-list > wrote: > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 at 03:11, Magnus Bergman > > wrote: > > > On Tue, 11 Sep 2018 00:07:27 +0200 > > > Bastien Nocera

Re: An alternative to gdk-pixbuf

2018-09-15 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 09:47:33 +0100 John Emmas wrote: > Sorry, I haven't been following this conversation but as a > side-issue... I only noticed this morning that gdk-pixbuf doesn't > seem to be able to load TIF images any more. I've attached a small > file that won't load but I haven't managed

Re: To which package does glade-catalog.dtd belong ?

2006-10-17 Thread Magnus Bergman
On Tue, 17 Oct 2006 11:58:08 +0200 Philippe Bertin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello all, Sorry to crosspost, but I think this topic can belong to any of the 3 newslists. If this is not good with you, please indicate me which list is most appropriate, please (please do not flame me). While