On 3/14/07, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
we appreciate contributions, e.g. patches against the SVN
module that hosts the web site:
http://svn.gnome.org/svn/gtk-web/
such a patch should change the pages needing updates and update the
gtk-web/ChangeLog. also patches should be
On 3/14/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/14/07, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Should we send patches to this list I suppose?
for the moment, yes.
and please let us know if you already have commit access
On 3/15/07, Emmanuele Bassi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 2007-03-15 at 06:01 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On 3/14/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 3/14/07, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 14 Mar 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Should we
On 3/14/07, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
such a patch should change the pages needing updates and update the
gtk-web/ChangeLog. also patches should be generated with diff -up.
I have a patch attached which makes use of 'svn diff' and wonder if
that's enough. It makes NEWS section in
On 3/16/07, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 16 Mar 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On 3/15/07, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 15 Mar 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
It makes NEWS section in trunk/index.html a bit more
concise and therefore 'more readable'. I
On 3/20/07, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, 18 Mar 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
Here's the changelog entries of my changes to the webpages which I
hope you'll apply to SVN:
thanks for your effort.
me glad
* index.html, oldnews.html: transferred most NEWS entries
On 3/16/07, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
The directory 'trunk/debian' in svn is nearly 10 years old and I
wonder who still uses it. Shouldn't it get removed?
anyone out there?
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list
)
@@ -1,3 +1,48 @@
+2007-03-29 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ * glib-1.2-NEWS.html:
+ * gtk-2.10-notes.html:
+ * section_end.html:
+ * gtk-2.10-announcement.html:
+ * box_begin.html:
+ * bindings.html:
+ * box_middle.html:
+ * announce.html:
+ * gtk-2.0.0-notes.html:
+ * gtk-2.4.0-notes.html
Anyone with some time and commit rights please:
-- Forwarded message --
From: Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mar 29, 2007 11:02 AM
Subject: [WEB PATCH] towards making gtk website valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional
To: gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
Hi,
Here's an incomplete
Hi,
Here's another patch, albeit a small one.
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 573)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2007-04-10 Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ * box_middle.html: update Dia's web
Here's a minor patch. Please commit...
--
my place on the web:
floss-and-misc.blogspot.com
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On 4/12/07, Gian Mario Tagliaretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/4/12, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Tshepang,
Here's a minor patch. Please commit...
you probably forgot the attachment.
pretty embarassing
Index: ChangeLog
On 4/12/07, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On 4/12/07, Gian Mario Tagliaretti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2007/4/12, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Tshepang,
Here's a minor patch. Please commit...
you probably forgot the attachment
On 4/23/07, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Christophe Dehais wrote:
On 4/23/07, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Questions:
==
• Does anyone else have any further suggestions at this stage?
What about refreshing gtk logo in the process ?
I was thinking
On 4/23/07, Martyn Russell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am thinking of doing this in 2 stages:
1. Remove all the unnecessary files and have a general clean up and
reorganise.
2. Restyle the site.
I can't wait for those updates. I also don't have too much time but
please state if you want some
On 4/23/07, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 23 Apr 2007, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
Hi,
I wonder if gtk.org is still hosted at Berkeley as mentioned here:
http://gtk.org/about.html. I also wonder if we I should get rid of the
2nd paragraph or write it in past tense. How about
On 4/27/07, Tim Janik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
using svn blame gtkfaq.sgml and svn blame gtk-faq.sgml,
it looks like gtkfaq.sgml is a fair bit older. if you
can verify that gtk-faq.sgml contains everything from
gtkfaq.sgml and more, we can remove gtkfaq.sgml from SVN.
Shown below are 2
On 5/10/07, Attilio Fiandrotti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One more thing: i often need to disturb mike or loic to get patches
cheched in, may i get write access to gnome's svn repo to manage the
directfb backend?
Check this out:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/policies/accounts/requesting.html
On 6/12/07, Kristian Rietveld [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Jun 10, 2007 at 10:38:44AM +0200, Murray Cumming wrote:
There's also a new GtkTooltip object. Could we have some more information
about how this should be used and if it replaces any existing API, please?
Sure ;) As Matthias
On 7/2/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
Is there any document like this:
http://www.sunsite.ualberta.ca/Documentation/Graphics/by-node/gtk+-1.1.1/gtk_toc.html
Showing the internal details of GTK. This one is pretty outdated(almost 9
yrs old) and incomplete. I wanted to
Looking here:
http://developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-Key-value-file-parser.html
under the section describing differences between .ini files and key
files I find this:
* Key files allow only comments before the first group.
I saw a typical key file and found comments could be put
On 3/3/07, Ben Combee [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just realized that GLIb 2.12.9 had been released almost a month ago
after seeing it mentioned in a message here. Is there a reason that
the main page of gtk.org doesn't have any 2007 updates?
It's just an issue of manpower. Look at:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:16, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 7:02 PM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
2010/6/14 Sam Thursfield sss...@gmail.com:
A more socially-minded approach would be to work on the problem of
sharing a GTK+ runtime between all
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:05, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
Why do they have little chance of going upstream?
Because the maintainer says so?
Is it good enough that the maintainer doesn't even give a reason? Did
I miss something?
--
blog: http://tshepang.tumblr.com
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 10:23, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
Is it good enough that the maintainer doesn't even give a reason?
It is good enough for me. I admire a maintainer that doesn't let
everything turn into bikeshedding.
A short explanation would be far better than just we are
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 11:59, Martyn Russell mar...@lanedo.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-06-15 at 09:54 +0200, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 01:16, Matthias Clasen
That may be, but 'disable this random set of widgets I don't need'
patches have very little chance of going
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 13:35, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2010 at 6:10 AM, Tshepang Lekhonkhobe
tshep...@gmail.com wrote:
Yeah, I get it, but here's the point: it isn't nice when a maintainer
says unlikely without giving even one reason, leaving the rest
On Sun, Nov 7, 2010 at 23:24, John Stowers john.stowers.li...@gmail.com wrote:
John
[1] http://github.com/nzjrs/pygtk/commits/gtk-3.0
[2] http://github.com/nzjrs/pygobject/tree/gtk-3.0
What's the status of this now? Is there every likely to be a pygtk
release for GTK+ 3?
I
On Thu, Oct 28, 2010 at 11:25, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote:
It's impressive to see someone promoting tech from the other camp :-)
Why not? It isn't like it would have any impact on my personal
happiness/income/status/reputation if people use Qt and not GTK+ for
cross-platform apps. Also,
29 matches
Mail list logo
