://live.gnome.org/GtkTasks
Thanks to everybody who contributed to this release:
Chun-wei Fan
Michael Natterer
Colin Walters
Martin Nordholts
Martin Pitt
Tristan Van Berkom
Szilárd Pfeiffer
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
Allin Cottrell
Tor Lillqvist
February 21, 2011
Matthias Clasen
Benjamin Otte
Javier Jardón
Martin Nordholts
Szilárd Pfeiffer
Alejandro Piñeiro Iglesias
Emmanuele Bassi
Carlos Garnacho
Allin Cottrell
Vincent Untz
Tor Lillqvist
Daniel Garcia
Marc-André Lureau
February 21, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk
handle large intervals
642490 notify_desktop_launch() g_variant_new_bytestring:...
* Translation updates
Bengali India
Polish
Thanks to the people who contributed to this release:
Ryan Lortie
Will Thompson
Colin Walters
Benjamin Otte
Stef Walter
Lin Ma
February 18, 2011
Matthias Clasen
handle large intervals
642490 notify_desktop_launch() g_variant_new_bytestring:...
* Translation updates
Bengali India
Polish
Thanks to the people who contributed to this release:
Ryan Lortie
Will Thompson
Colin Walters
Benjamin Otte
Stef Walter
Lin Ma
February 18, 2011
Matthias Clasen
On Fri, Feb 18, 2011 at 6:19 PM, Andrea Bolognani e...@kiyuko.org wrote:
From what I’ve seen, to make my code work seamlessy in Gjs the following
things would need to be done:
* Add support for boxing a GError** into GValue
* Add support for a ERROR parameter type to
handle large intervals
642490 notify_desktop_launch() g_variant_new_bytestring:...
* Translation updates
Bengali India
Polish
Thanks to the people who contributed to this release:
Ryan Lortie
Will Thompson
Colin Walters
Benjamin Otte
Stef Walter
Lin Ma
February 18, 2011
Matthias Clasen
Hey,
I've spent the last night poring through gail bugs and code, and came
to the conclusion that we need to face the tough reality that the
state of a11y in GTK+ is sadly declining. There were years old patches
in bugzilla which fix pretty obvious bugs; on top of that, I've fixed
at least one
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote:
Although move the gail implementation to gtk has his advantages, why
this would be better that just fix them directly on gail? One of the
big problems here is the lack of resources, so doing the move would
add a extra work
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 9:54 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-17 at 09:43 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
The current state of affairs cannot be useful for anybody.
let's also look at the state of Atk's API, and what's required to do to
create an ATK implementation
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:22 AM, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote:
Ok, so you are proposing a change more deep that I thought.
You are proposing to forget this proxy approach on the accessibility
support. As far as I understand you are proposing to implement the ATK
interfaces directly on
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote:
1 of 4 is failing. Could you elaborate why this theorical points have
failed miserably?
In my view, keeping the a11y implementation in their separate module
ghetto is a failure in terms of maintenance, performance, and
On Thu, Feb 17, 2011 at 12:23 PM, Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com wrote:
So probably we could study that. Anyway, in the same way, right now I
don't see how this would better that the option proposed by Matthias.
Oh, I think having the option of implementing the a11y interface in
the widget
On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote:
Hey,
I've pushed a new branch picture to the gtk repository. It contains
an implementation of an idea I've toyed with in my mind for a while.
It's of course not finished yet, but already works very well and more
importantly
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:14 AM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
Well, I think the easiest thing is to explain at the top of each
version, like I did for 3. Though now that library can parallel
display the two I need to update it to say GTK+ 2 is at /gtk and GTK3
is at /gtk3.
I
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 12:01 PM, Colin Walters walt...@verbum.org wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Similarly it would make sense to have the GTK+ 2 docs mention GTK3.
This is a good idea, indeed.
How about these two patches for GTK3
on GtkApplication
* Ryan Lortie (Codethink), for his work on dconf, GSettings and
GtkApplication
* Javier Jardón, for tireless code, build and documentation cleanup
February 10, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
on GtkApplication
* Ryan Lortie (Codethink), for his work on dconf, GSettings and
GtkApplication
* Javier Jardón, for tireless code, build and documentation cleanup
February 10, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
the migration doc mentioned in matthias' email announcement is 404'd
Should be there now, I think.
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:03 PM, Andrew Cowie
and...@operationaldynamics.com wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:47 -0500, Shaun McCance wrote:
On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 10:00 +1100, Andrew Cowie wrote:
On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 22:24 +0100, Tadej Borovšak wrote:
on GtkApplication
* Ryan Lortie (Codethink), for his work on dconf, GSettings and
GtkApplication
* Javier Jardón, for tireless code, build and documentation cleanup
February 10, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http
information about GLib is available at:
http://www.gtk.org/
The GLib Team:
Hans Breuer, Matthias Clasen, Tim Janik, Tor Lillqvist,
Manish Singh, Owen Taylor, and Sebastian Wilhelmi
Thanks to all contributors, including
Alberto Garcia
Andre Klapper
Bastien Nocera
Behdad Esfahbod
Benjamin Gilbert
information about GLib is available at:
http://www.gtk.org/
The GLib Team:
Hans Breuer, Matthias Clasen, Tim Janik, Tor Lillqvist,
Manish Singh, Owen Taylor, and Sebastian Wilhelmi
Thanks to all contributors, including
Alberto Garcia
Andre Klapper
Bastien Nocera
Behdad Esfahbod
Benjamin Gilbert
information about GLib is available at:
http://www.gtk.org/
The GLib Team:
Hans Breuer, Matthias Clasen, Tim Janik, Tor Lillqvist,
Manish Singh, Owen Taylor, and Sebastian Wilhelmi
Thanks to all contributors, including
Alberto Garcia
Andre Klapper
Bastien Nocera
Behdad Esfahbod
Benjamin Gilbert
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:47 PM, Allin Cottrell cottr...@wfu.edu wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Allin Cottrell wrote:
On Fri, 4 Feb 2011, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:15 PM, craigbakalian craigbakal...@verizon.net
wrote:
Is there a glib version I should download
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 2:15 PM, craigbakalian craigbakal...@verizon.net wrote:
Is there a glib version I should download and install? There are many
on the the Gtk+ site. I don't know what one is compatible with Gtk3.
Do I need git to download the latest Glib?
configure will tell you if it
Quintero
Christian Persch
Guillaume Desmottes
Murray Cumming
Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
Krzesimir Nowak
Paolo Borelli
Emmanuele Bassi
Stefan Kost
Kristian Rietveld
Dan Winship
Vincent Untz
February 1, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
On Tue, Feb 1, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Vincent Untz vu...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi Benjamin,
Le lundi 31 janvier 2011, à 07:13 +0100, Benjamin Otte a écrit :
Hey,
I intend to remove the following things from GDK on my quest to get
rid of GdkNativeWindow.
Cool stuff, nice to see more cleaning, etc.
Quintero
Christian Persch
Guillaume Desmottes
Murray Cumming
Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
Krzesimir Nowak
Paolo Borelli
Emmanuele Bassi
Stefan Kost
Kristian Rietveld
Dan Winship
Vincent Untz
February 1, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk
Quintero
Christian Persch
Guillaume Desmottes
Murray Cumming
Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
Krzesimir Nowak
Paolo Borelli
Emmanuele Bassi
Stefan Kost
Kristian Rietveld
Dan Winship
Vincent Untz
February 1, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote:
Hey,
I intend to remove the following things from GDK on my quest to get
rid of GdkNativeWindow.
structs:
- GdkEventClientMessage:
functions:
- gdk_add_client_message_filter()
- gdk_event_send_client_message()
-
On Mon, Jan 31, 2011 at 1:13 AM, Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote:
Which brings me to the point of this mail:
Is there an actual user of this?
Only other place I found in gnome is the keyboard plugin in
gnome-settings-daemon, which has a use of
gdk_display_add_client_message_filter
On Sun, Jan 30, 2011 at 11:25 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Undefined symbols:
_gtk_combo_box_text_new, referenced from:
_create_combo_box in sizegroup.o
_attach_widgets in textview.o
_gtk_combo_box_text_new_with_entry, referenced from:
_do_combobox in combobox.o
pointers
640823 wrong documentation for g_source_add_child_source
* Translation updates:
Bulgarian
Galician
Hebrew
Norwegian bokmål
Spanish
Traditional Chinese
Thanks to the contributors:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Ryan Lortie
Tobias Mueller
Dan Winship
Benjamin Gilbert
January 28, 2011
Matthias
Dywan
Marek Kasik
Chun-wei Fan
Bastien Nocera
Javier Jardón
Michael Natterer
Benjamin Otte
Colin Walters
Murray Cumming
Martyn Russell
Tristan Van Berkom
Carlos Garcia Campos
Tor Lillqvist
Alejandro Piñeiro
Adel Gadllah
Adrian Johnson
Milan Bouchet-Valat
Frederic Croszat
January 30, 2011
Matthias
pointers
640823 wrong documentation for g_source_add_child_source
* Translation updates:
Bulgarian
Galician
Hebrew
Norwegian bokmål
Spanish
Traditional Chinese
Thanks to the contributors:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Ryan Lortie
Tobias Mueller
Dan Winship
Benjamin Gilbert
January 28, 2011
Matthias
Dywan
Marek Kasik
Chun-wei Fan
Bastien Nocera
Javier Jardón
Michael Natterer
Benjamin Otte
Colin Walters
Murray Cumming
Martyn Russell
Tristan Van Berkom
Carlos Garcia Campos
Tor Lillqvist
Alejandro Piñeiro
Adel Gadllah
Adrian Johnson
Milan Bouchet-Valat
Frederic Croszat
January 30, 2011
Matthias
pointers
640823 wrong documentation for g_source_add_child_source
* Translation updates:
Bulgarian
Galician
Hebrew
Norwegian bokmål
Spanish
Traditional Chinese
Thanks to the contributors:
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
Ryan Lortie
Tobias Mueller
Dan Winship
Benjamin Gilbert
January 28, 2011
Matthias
Dywan
Marek Kasik
Chun-wei Fan
Bastien Nocera
Javier Jardón
Michael Natterer
Benjamin Otte
Colin Walters
Murray Cumming
Martyn Russell
Tristan Van Berkom
Carlos Garcia Campos
Tor Lillqvist
Alejandro Piñeiro
Adel Gadllah
Adrian Johnson
Milan Bouchet-Valat
Frederic Croszat
January 30, 2011
Matthias
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 2:18 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
trista...@openismus.com wrote:
In conclusion:
=
Can we do either one of the following (in the order of my preference):
a.) Give up the complaining about moving code from _init() to
-constructor() and just accept that
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Hans Breuer h...@breuer.org wrote:
At 26.01.2011 17:33, Benjamin Otte wrote:
Hans Breuerhansat breuer.org writes:
Current master has three occurences of
#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11
if (GDK_IS_X11_DISPLAY (display))
followed by some
window =
Minutes
• overriding icons (css equivalent for gtkrc stock icons)
∘ it is possible to do override stock icons by relying on the
fallback to icon-theme and prepending to the icon theme path
∘ some stock functionality (per-state, per-text-direction variants)
not available in this way
∘ -
I think it would be a good idea to have a team meeting tomorrow, usual
time and place, to put the last nails into 3.0.
Unfortunately, I'm not yet 100% sure if I can actually be around at
the usual time tomorrow, so this is a somewhat tentative invite.
Matthias
Persch
Ray Strode
Behdad Esfahbod
January 22, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Persch
Ray Strode
Behdad Esfahbod
January 22, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
On Thu, Jan 13, 2011 at 3:57 AM, Elmir Jagudin elmir.jagu...@axis.com wrote:
Hi
I have filed a bug report in Bugzilla 2010-11-26:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=635852
I have received no reply as of this date. I think the issue is real
and the bugzilla entry contains a patch
On Thu, 2011-01-13 at 16:18 +0100, Thierry Vignaud wrote:
Given that those fixes were documented in git, why not describe them
here as usual?
http://git.gnome.org/browse/gtk+/commit/?id=03344207b9b2951bb51a31ff06fe6910542e6d99
I was tired, sorry.
GTK+ 2.99.2 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.99/
http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.99/
fca4b39359e7ab9532aaf826518ef5d3f6ba5174799883f8b0975783f76db4ad gtk
+-2.99.2.tar.bz2
97c55a876ccf4e1f267636797399ddea58fde4e8a2e291692d263affe356af22 gtk
GTK+ 2.99.2 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.99/
http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.99/
fca4b39359e7ab9532aaf826518ef5d3f6ba5174799883f8b0975783f76db4ad gtk
+-2.99.2.tar.bz2
97c55a876ccf4e1f267636797399ddea58fde4e8a2e291692d263affe356af22 gtk
GTK+ 2.99.2 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.99/
http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.99/
fca4b39359e7ab9532aaf826518ef5d3f6ba5174799883f8b0975783f76db4ad gtk
+-2.99.2.tar.bz2
97c55a876ccf4e1f267636797399ddea58fde4e8a2e291692d263affe356af22 gtk
Selkowitz
Hans Breuer
Sébastien Granjoux
January 10, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Selkowitz
Hans Breuer
Sébastien Granjoux
January 10, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Selkowitz
Hans Breuer
Sébastien Granjoux
January 10, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Borovšak
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
January 6, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Borovšak
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
January 6, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Contributors to this release:
Tor Lillqvist
Alejandro Piñeiro
Murray Cumming
Benjamin Otte
Adel Gadllah
Adrian Johnson
Milan Bouchet-Valat
Frederic Croszat
January 6, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http
Borovšak
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
January 6, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Borovšak
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
January 6, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Contributors to this release:
Tor Lillqvist
Alejandro Piñeiro
Murray Cumming
Benjamin Otte
Adel Gadllah
Adrian Johnson
Milan Bouchet-Valat
Frederic Croszat
January 6, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http
Borovšak
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
January 6, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Borovšak
Emilio Pozuelo Monfort
January 6, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
Contributors to this release:
Tor Lillqvist
Alejandro Piñeiro
Murray Cumming
Benjamin Otte
Adel Gadllah
Adrian Johnson
Milan Bouchet-Valat
Frederic Croszat
January 6, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
Dufresne
Christian Persch
January 5, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
Dufresne
Christian Persch
January 5, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
Dufresne
Christian Persch
January 5, 2011
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
2010/12/23 Sebastian Dröge sebastian.dro...@collabora.co.uk:
IMHO (not being a GLib maintainer) this would only be useful in very
specific scenarios and wouldn't be something for a general purpose
library like GLib. But maybe others disagree :)
No, I think you pretty much nailed it. GLib is
Gorse
December 21, 2010
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
contributed to this release:
Chun-wei Fan
Bastien Nocera
Javier Jardón
Federico Mena Quintero
Michael Natterer
Benjamin Otte
Colin Walters
Murray Cumming
Martyn Russell
Tristan Van Berkom
Carlos Garcia Campos
December 21, 2010
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app
Gorse
December 21, 2010
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
contributed to this release:
Chun-wei Fan
Bastien Nocera
Javier Jardón
Federico Mena Quintero
Michael Natterer
Benjamin Otte
Colin Walters
Murray Cumming
Martyn Russell
Tristan Van Berkom
Carlos Garcia Campos
December 21, 2010
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel
Gorse
December 21, 2010
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
contributed to this release:
Chun-wei Fan
Bastien Nocera
Javier Jardón
Federico Mena Quintero
Michael Natterer
Benjamin Otte
Colin Walters
Murray Cumming
Martyn Russell
Tristan Van Berkom
Carlos Garcia Campos
December 21, 2010
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list
Monfort
Christian Persch
Xavier Claessens
Peng Huang
Ted Gould
Pavel Holejsovsky
Cosimo Cecchi
Murray Cumming
John Palmieri
Will Thompson
Javier Jardón
December 20, 2010
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
Monfort
Christian Persch
Xavier Claessens
Peng Huang
Ted Gould
Pavel Holejsovsky
Cosimo Cecchi
Murray Cumming
John Palmieri
Will Thompson
Javier Jardón
December 20, 2010
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http
Monfort
Christian Persch
Xavier Claessens
Peng Huang
Ted Gould
Pavel Holejsovsky
Cosimo Cecchi
Murray Cumming
John Palmieri
Will Thompson
Javier Jardón
December 20, 2010
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 1:09 AM, Tristan Van Berkom
trista...@openismus.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 19:33 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Tristan,
another thing (that I believe Cosimo already pointed out) is that the
new cell area code seems to not quite get interaction between cell
data
On Sat, Dec 18, 2010 at 6:09 AM, Carlos Garnacho carl...@gnome.org wrote:
Hey,
void gtk_cell_area_set_style_detail (GtkCellArea *area,
const gchar
*detail);
Before we let these APIs go stable, we should figure out how this is
A little update on the status of these actions:
ACTION: test treeview-refactor with a very large dataset (kris)
ACTION: merge treeview-refactor before next snapshot (tristan, kris)
Done
ACTION: review for combo-box-refactor (mclasen?, kris next week)
ACTION: review iconv-iew-refactor
On Fri, Dec 17, 2010 at 2:09 PM, Tristan Van Berkom
trista...@openismus.com wrote:
On Fri, 2010-12-17 at 13:50 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
A little update on the status of these actions:
ACTION: test treeview-refactor with a very large dataset (kris)
ACTION: merge treeview-refactor before
Tristan,
another thing (that I believe Cosimo already pointed out) is that the
new cell area code seems to not quite get interaction between cell
data functions and size allocation right.
You can see the resulting breakage in testappchooser. The treeview in
the appchooser uses a separate cell
2010/12/15 Piñeiro apinhe...@igalia.com:
Are this treeview refactoring mostly internal, or are there specific
API changes? After this refactoring it would be required to be
modified the apps using GtkTreeView?
Anyway I was also thinking on GailTreeView, the object that provides
the
On Wed, Dec 15, 2010 at 8:43 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
But since you bring it up, what is the official policy? Is it C89? Is it
published somewhere?
For GTK+, we're generally avoiding C++ comments, since they cause
problems for the compilers that are used on win32. What other
On Tue, Dec 14, 2010 at 8:31 AM, Carlos Garnacho carl...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi!,
I've been wanting to raise this topic for some time. The patch
(attached) is simple, it basically will enable the XInput2
GdkDeviceManager by default, unless gdk_disable_multidevice() is called.
Even if the
On Mon, Dec 13, 2010 at 4:39 AM, Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote:
What I'd do is put all the headers in the same directory, but add a
#ifdef GDK_WINDOWING_X11 to the header and then put
-DGDK_WINDOWING_X11 into gtk+-3.0-x11.pc That way we avoid lots of
different include directories and IMO
On Sun, Dec 12, 2010 at 1:37 PM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
backend.
Yes, I am going to bring it back.
I see you added it back as it was before (i.e. a copy of the main one).
I dunno if it is very important, but the idea i had was to make e.g. gtk
+-3.0-x11.pc just depend on
I have mostly taken care of GdkDragContext, GdkVisual and GdkDevice now.
Some of the remaining pieces look more like candidates for dropping/cleanup
instead of virtualization though:
gdk_spawn_command_line_on_screen
gdk_spawn_on_screen
gdk_spawn_on_screen_with_pipes
Looking over the backends,
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:37 PM, Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote:
While we're talking about getting rid of stuff, I'd like to get rid of
gdk_utf8_to_string_target
gdk_string_to_compound_text_for_display
gdk_utf8_to_compound_text_for_display
gdk_free_text_list
gdk_free_compound_text
But
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 12:22 PM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
I have mostly taken care of GdkDragContext, GdkVisual and GdkDevice now.
Some of the remaining pieces look more like candidates for dropping/cleanup
instead of virtualization though
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 1:29 PM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 23:28 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 23:28 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
* Merge gdk and gtk
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 2:18 PM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 14:25 +, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
hi everyone;
this is a reminder that the next GTK team meeting is scheduled for:
Tuesday, December 14th, 2010 @ 20:00 UTC
On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 3:50 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
GdkSelection is a wrapper around the X11 selection functions. It's not used
by Gtk, which has its own higher-level selection object which ties into
GtkClipboard and GtkDnd... which is why almost nobody knows about
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Tomas Bzatek tbza...@redhat.com wrote:
On Tue, 2010-12-07 at 22:02 +, Martyn Russell wrote:
I have created a branch for the updated tracker backend used for
searching in the GtkFileChooser. Any comments?
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 23:28 +0100, Alexander Larsson wrote:
* Merge gdk and gtk+ (if we want to do this, and i think it makes sense)
* Rename libgtk-x11-3.0.so to libgtk-3.0.so
* Change the way the pc files are set up
On Tue, Dec 7, 2010 at 7:33 AM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
gdk_add_client_message_filter
gdk_devices_list
gdk_get_display
gdk_window_lookup
_gdk_windowing_get_startup_notify_id
_gdk_windowing_launch_failed
I have handled these now.
Might be good to discuss at the team meeting that we should hold next week.
Will you be able to make that, next Tuesday ?
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 6:52 AM, Benjamin Otte o...@gnome.org wrote:
Can we just remove GtkStyle, please? And deal with the fallout?
No, we can't 'just' do that. It is deprecated now. Once all of gnome
is building against it with -DGTK_DISABLE_DEPRECATED, we can talk
about removing it, not
Also, do you target this for 3.0? Because I don't think it's doable in an
API-stable way during 3.x?
Too late for 3.0. Remember, there will be a 4.0 at some point.
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 1:45 PM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 11:33 -0500, Matthias Clasen wrote:
Also, do you target this for 3.0? Because I don't think it's doable in an
API-stable way during 3.x?
Too late for 3.0. Remember, there will be a 4.0
On Mon, Dec 6, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Alexander Larsson al...@redhat.com wrote:
I have to admit that I haven't looked closely at the actual api/abi impact.
If it is just code motion and cleanup, then we can try to shoehorn it in.
But even so, we are a little less than a month away from 3.0
Well,
to all contributors:
Chun-wei Fan
Benjamin Otte
Cosimo Cecchi
Ryan Lortie
Javier Jardón
Tomas Bzatek
Colin Walters
Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
Owen W. Taylor
Cosimo Cecchi
Dan Winship
Christian Persch
Aleksander Morgado
Jonas Holmberg
Matt Rajca
Xan Lopez
November 29, 2010
Matthias Clasen
Lillqvist
Benjamin Otte
Milan Bouchet-Valat
Emmanuele Bassi
November 29, 2010
Matthias Clasen
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-app-devel-list
401 - 500 of 1970 matches
Mail list logo
