On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 1:39 PM, Marc-André Lureau
marcandre.lur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 7:18 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.comwrote:
to be relocatable, your app should *fall back* on -DPKGDATADIR but should
first try checking for an environment variable
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Marc-André Lureau
marcandre.lur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.comwrote:
i assume you mean as the fallback?
You said, should first try checking for an environment variable and then
a path relative
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.comwrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 2:19 PM, Marc-André Lureau
marcandre.lur...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 10, 2013 at 8:08 PM, Paul Davis
p...@linuxaudiosystems.comwrote:
i assume you mean as the fallback?
You said
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:11 PM, אנטולי קרסנר tomback...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I'm writing an application in C++ with gtkmm.
I want to have an unordered container, std::unordered_map, in which the
key type is Glib::ustring. It means I need choose one of these options:
1. Make the map
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 12:23 PM, אנטולי קרסנר tomback...@gmail.com wrote:
Why? Isn't it natural to wish to have a map containing user-defined
strings, which may be in any language?
that describes std::string too.
all that Glib::ustring gives you are UTF-8-aware iterators.
if you never
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 8:39 AM, John Emmas john...@tiscali.co.uk wrote:
If I'm working on an application which still uses GTK+ version 2, is it
still possible to obtain the sources (using subversion or git) or is
version 2 only available from tarballs now?
git clone
On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 6:56 PM, tarn...@tarnyko.net wrote:
Hi folks,
The subject of this mail is taken from the corresponding thread on
gtk-list. The thread itself (a few days old) can be read here :
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 12:08 PM, Allin Cottrell cottr...@wfu.edu wrote:
Hello all,
I recently did a native quartz build of the GTK stack on OS X 10.6.8,
using gtk+-2.24.16 along with latest-stable versions of GLib and all other
dependencies (including FreeType 2.4.11 and fontconfig 2.10.2).
On Sat, Mar 2, 2013 at 6:16 AM, Dr. Thomas Tensi t.te...@gmx.de wrote:
Dear all,
I have installed the current version of gtk2 via Macports on
a PowerPC Mac mini with Mac OSX 10.4. This is a Quartz
installation without any underlying X11.
When I start gtk-demo, the application comes up as
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.huwrote:
Unfortunately our efforts are severely impacted by the lack of official
GTK+
installers for Windows and OS X and this uncertainty was a major reason
which
brought the Qt port alive.
I'm not speaking as a
On Sun, Feb 17, 2013 at 1:44 PM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.huwrote:
Hi Paul,
2013/2/17 Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com:
On Sat, Feb 16, 2013 at 7:27 AM, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu
wrote:
Unfortunately our efforts are severely impacted by the lack
just stop doing all of this.
ensure that there is only 1 thread making calls to GTK/GDK/X.
if other threads need to get graphical work done, use g_idle_add() or its
cousins.
no locks, no questions about parallelism for any GUI stuff. really, this is
what most of us are doing these days.
On
On Sat, Jan 12, 2013 at 12:13 PM, sam tygier samtyg...@yahoo.co.uk wrote:
Hi,
I am hitting a bug in rawtherapee (
http://code.google.com/p/rawtherapee/issues/detail?id=1675 ) which
appears to stem from a difference between the behaviour of
Glib::Mutex::Lock() on linux and windows. The
On Thu, Jan 10, 2013 at 1:55 AM, aix64 hossein.ai...@gmail.com wrote:
I can't clearly tell what specifically you're asking, whether the
network or the client-server interaction for fetching the data.
Please be more specific, AND:
reply to the list (gtk-devel-list@gnome.org) not to me :-D
On 11/11/2012 10:17 AM, Benjamin Otte wrote:
GTK 3 at this point really is just the GNOME toolkit. There is
absolutely zero
involvement from anyone else. Neither XFCE nor LXDE nor Windows or OS X
developers take any interest in pushing the toolkit forward - apart from
occasional bug
On Tue, Oct 9, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Alejandro T. Colombini
atcolomb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I've spent the last days adding i18n to a project I'm working on. I've
been looking for some manual or reference that could help me with that task
and I've found this very well written and explained
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 11:11 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
[ a lot of very confusing stuff ... ]
are you saying that g_idle_add() is not thread-safe? because if it IS
threadsafe, and the rest of program either
(a) only uses g_idle_add() to get work done in the main
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 9:20 AM, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca wrote:
hi,
Thanks for the feedback.
On 12-09-12 05:15 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org wrote:
I object. Do you really want to disable shortcut editors in
complex
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 4:43 PM, Juan Pablo Ugarte
juanpablouga...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, 2012-09-13 at 06:22 +, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
From what I see... all one should *need* to do is specify the
accelerator keys
desired to trigger a given GtkAction and add that action to an
On Thu, Sep 13, 2012 at 11:55 AM, Yehouda Harpaz y...@lispworks.com wrote:
We produce a programming environment for lisp that us GTK for gUI on
have you read the discussion of this in the archives of gtk-devel? the
thread is called deprecating gdk threads
there was also a discussion of
On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 5:07 PM, Michael Natterer mi...@gimp.org wrote:
On Wed, 2012-09-12 at 16:27 -0400, Ryan Lortie wrote:
hi,
I recently wrote a patch[1] to re-enable accel labels in GtkMenu
generated from GMenuModel. They got lost in the shuffle during some
related recent
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Pavel Holejsovsky
pavel.holejsov...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
Pavel, on re-reading Colin's bug report and then your original message, I
realize that I was not paying attention. You were discussing object cleanup
from GC in non-main-event-loop threads, not
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 7:53 AM, Prasanta Sadhukhan psadhuk...@gmail.comwrote:
Hi,
I am trying to draw something on offscreen surface and then trying to
render it on primary window. I started with simple primitives like
rectangle but it seems to not draw anything except a blank white window.
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 11:08 AM, Pavel Holejsovsky
pavel.holejsov...@gmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
Sorry for not being clear. I wanted to say that previously, when higher
language registered callback or signal, it didn't have to bother whether
the callback or signal will be called with proper
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 1:28 PM, Pavel Holejsovsky
pavel.holejsov...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, 06 Aug 2012 11:56:48 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
i don't believe that there are any examples in glib/gdk/gtk where a
signal handler attached to a signal of a glib/gdk/gtk object will be
executed
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Stef Walter st...@gnome.org wrote:
On 08/06/2012 05:56 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
i don't believe that there are any examples in glib/gdk/gtk where a
signal handler attached to a signal of a glib/gdk/gtk object will be
executed in anything other than the main
On Mon, Aug 6, 2012 at 2:56 AM, SHOBHIT SRIVASTAVA shobhi...@samsung.comwrote:
Hi
I am getting a SIGABRT in my code which is raised from glib. The exact
error message is as below
*GLib (gthread-posix.c): Unexpected error from C library during
'pthread_setspecific': Invalid argument.
On Thu, Aug 2, 2012 at 5:42 AM, Simon Schampijer si...@schampijer.dewrote:
=== 3. SpinButton ===
[ ... ]
Another option is introducing a complete new widget targeted at touch
usage (similar to the one in iOS Garageband) [4] which Carlos implemented
already [5]. The issue is here the
On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 6:42 PM, Sergei Steshenko sergst...@yahoo.comwrote:
I.e. had I started today, I would have written my application in Qt +
Qt-script + QML.
had i started today, i would have used pygtk for the GUI. and if not that,
then neither Qt nor GTK, but some bitmap-based
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 8:35 PM, John Lindgren john.lindg...@aol.comwrote:
Might I suggest putting less time into making things look flashy, and more
time into making them work well, if you are short on developers? CSS
theming may be cool, but I would rather have a working GTK+ 3.x for
On Sun, Jul 29, 2012 at 9:56 PM, Sergei Steshenko sergst...@yahoo.comwrote:
Is then switching to Qt a viable/practical alternative ?
IMO, this question has absolutely nothing to do with what I wrote earlier.
In addition, it has been remarked before that this list is not an
appropriate forum
On Sat, Jul 28, 2012 at 2:59 PM, Stevean Raja Kumar stev...@stevean.inwrote:
**
Hello All,
I am new to linux and I wanted to try out the GUI development using GTK.
There is no reason for you to be build GTK on a system that already has it
packaged and ready for use. you system already has
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Guetcho Guetchev
getcho.getc...@gmail.comwrote:
Hello guys,
I am trying to build Glib for iOS. I have set up everything - the cross
compiler, the toolchain, etc. The build process takes place on Mac OS 10.7.4
I am able to build Glib from the release tarball.
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 6:49 PM, Hubert Figuière hfigui...@teaser.frwrote:
On 17/07/12 03:46 PM, Paul Davis wrote:
it can be very hard. there are two approaches. one is to build a
pseudo/fake gtk-doc package for OS X, which does actually exist, but i
can't tell you where to find it. google
On Thu, Jul 12, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Thomas Dineen tdin...@ix.netcom.comwrote:
The code shown is cut from a GTK Scrolled window example and is based on
gtk_dialog_new which from my experiments dose NOT allow Cairo drawing.
all drawing in GTK is done with Cairo.
you generally create a
/* Initialize threading in older libraries */
#if (!GLIB_CHECK_VERSION (2, 31, 0))
g_thread_init (NULL);
#endif
#if (!CLUTTER_CHECK_VERSION (1, 9, 0))'
these are compile time checks ... seems unwise, no?
___
gtk-list mailing list
i've recently appended info to the following bug report about a regression
in gtk-2-24 introduced by a commit from April. i don't know if there are
any plans for a new gtk2 release, but this bug is relatively serious, since
it makes the filechooser misbehave in many common cases.
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 4:55 PM, S G sophiespinn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Despite all the activity on the web about this subject, I have not found
how to get rid of this problem on my system.
I downloaded and installed GTK+ a few days ago and it seems I got version
2.24. I am trying to
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 AM, johny why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
Can gtk_rc_parse_string or other functions on the page below be used
to write to the gtkrc-2.0 file? Or only read?
as already explained, read only.
http://developer.gnome.org/gtk/stable/gtk-Resource-Files.html
Is there
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Johny Why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
Why odd?
How do other gtk theme editors do it?
what other theme editors? if they exist, go read the source ...
___
gtk-app-devel-list mailing list
gtk-app-devel-list@gnome.org
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:48 AM, Johny Why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
Why odd?
How do other gtk theme editors do it?
what other theme editors? if they exist, go read the source ...
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 12:11 AM, johny why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
Can gtk_rc_parse_string or other functions on the page below be used
to write to the gtkrc-2.0 file? Or only read?
as already explained, read only.
http://developer.gnome.org/gtk/stable/gtk-Resource-Files.html
Is there
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 6:43 PM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
* Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
Found it...it talks about gtk3 2x slower than gtk2 which I really did
not notice and cannot say how good that benchmark is to reflect real
speed.
Well, AFAIK, gtk had become much more
On Mon, Jun 11, 2012 at 7:38 PM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
* Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
Well, AFAIK, gtk had become much more dynamic than its older
versions.
Maybe that's the problem: too many dynamic (heap) allocations,
lookups, etc
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Johny Why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the gtk functions exposed, so my app can call them in an existing gtk
desktop (eg. xfce)? Or is it necessary to recompile gtk?
Any getting started tips would be much appreciated by this noob.
your messages so far seem
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Johny Why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to write a script in bash or another language which reads/writes
gtkrc-2.0. Would prefer to use gtk built-in functions for the read/write.
GTK does not create these files. They are generally created by humans, and
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:11 AM, Johny Why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
Are the gtk functions exposed, so my app can call them in an existing gtk
desktop (eg. xfce)? Or is it necessary to recompile gtk?
Any getting started tips would be much appreciated by this noob.
your messages so far seem
On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 8:04 AM, Johny Why johny...@gmail.com wrote:
Trying to write a script in bash or another language which reads/writes
gtkrc-2.0. Would prefer to use gtk built-in functions for the read/write.
GTK does not create these files. They are generally created by humans, and
On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 8:10 PM, Russell Harmon r...@eatnumber1.com wrote:
Is there any particular reason I'm being ignored?
no.
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 7:36 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.comwrote:
So - yes, the solution of:
* simply re-write -all- your code to make everything call
asynchronous / idle handlers on one-of-N glib mainloops
Has the siren of simplicity for gtk+
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:00 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.comwrote:
Windows, has this rather nice 'SendMessage' abstraction that hides
that
synchronous cross-thread blocking fun,
its really not significantly different from g_idle_add(), except that
SendMessage relies on a
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.comwrote:
your code is designed around the execution of GDK/GTK code in multiple
threads. it was unfortunate that GDK/GTK ever allowed this (as has
been pointed out, this is absolutely NOT possible on Windows with
tablets are taking a dominant market share
which decade do you live in?
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 10:58 AM, Sarah Duncan sarah_dun...@wgbh.org wrote:
Thanks Yeti! I did finally find all of the necessary versions, but would
still be glad to learn a bit more from this experience, if you don't mind.
Part of my problem has definitely been that I don't know the
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 6:24 AM, Michael Meeks michael.me...@suse.com wrote:
[... ]
there seems to be some confusion here. I've read back over your posts
in the this thread. I don't see you mentioning libreoffice doing
anything that requires thread enter/leave calls. You've mentioned idle
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 1:53 PM, Chris Vine ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
That's interesting - you have found with Ardour that attaching timeout
sources to a main loop is not thread safe?
Not at all - we just don't want it. The other event loops run/provide
support for non-Graphical UIs,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:36 PM, Chris Vine ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
I was responding to your advice that If you want other threads to be
able to set up timeout callbacks in the GUI event loop, then just use
g_idle_add() to get them set up. Something seems to have become
elided in
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:50 PM, Chris Vine ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
On Wed, 25 Apr 2012 14:39:24 -0400
Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
i've never seen anyone remark that attaching a timeout (or other
source) to a main loop is thread safe. if it is, then great. i
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 3:28 PM, Chris Vine ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
If g_source_attach() is not thread safe, then g_idle_add() is not
threads safe: it invokes g_source_attach() in the same way that the
other *_add()'s do. Idle sources are just another source, albeit ones
which fire
2012/4/19 Patrick patr...@spellingbeewinnars.org:
Hope this makes sense. While I hope to change this one day, at the moment I
am just an amateur coder...
it doesn't really make sense.
run the GUI in its own thread (either the initial thread the process
starts with, or a different one).
run
Are there any plans for a gtkmm release based on gtk2 that will avoid
the endless messages about using deprecated API, some related to
thread stuff in gtk 2.24?
___
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 7:26 AM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
Are there any plans for a gtkmm release based on gtk2 that will avoid
the endless messages about using deprecated API, some related to
thread stuff in gtk 2.24?
these, specifically, are the messages i'm referring
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 1:19 PM, Daniel Levine dle...@hotmail.com wrote:
[ ... ]
try changing the GTK theme in use. theme engines are generally the
source of poor performance in GTK2 applications, unless the app is
just exceptionally badly coded.
___
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 9:34 AM, Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com wrote:
Heya,
On Mon 05 Mar 2012 14:07, Ryan Lortie de...@desrt.ca writes:
On Mon, 2012-03-05 at 12:11 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
Does that mean you're removing gdk_threads_enter and leave and the
semantics around that ? is
On Sun, Feb 12, 2012 at 11:37 PM, Enoch Langston palmett...@yahoo.comwrote:
My name is Kevin and I work in IT support. I am new to the mailing list
and development in general. I have found gtk both rewarding and difficult
to learn. I have especially been having a rough time with figuring out
On Thu, Feb 9, 2012 at 4:28 PM, Agnel Kurian agnel.kur...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to create a custom GTK+ widget using GTK+ 2.4.8 called from C++.
I find that the constructor and destructor of my widget is never called.
So...
1. Is this expected behaviour?
2. What is the usual
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:30 AM, victor-victor nada...@hotmail.com wrote:
Hello
I know how to grab a single key event with gdk, but I'd like to know how to
grab a key combination that is *not* using a modifier key. For example I
would like to grab when 'GDK_KEY_a' and 'GDK_KEY_right' are
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 10:34 AM, salsaman salsa...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Paul,
Have a look at gtk_key_snooper_install().
key snoopers are deprecated now.
we use them in ardour but will switch to gdk event filters soon.
___
gtk-list mailing list
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:21 AM, salsaman salsa...@gmail.com wrote:
What do you mean deprecated ? There is no mention of this in the
documentation.
i'm looking ahead to 3.0 and i talk to the GTK guys regularly on IRC.
___
gtk-list mailing list
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 11:41 AM, salsaman salsa...@gmail.com wrote:
So whats the replacement ? Set key event handlers for every single window ?
That makes no sense. Why remove a function which works perfectly well,
which people are relying on ?
gdk_window_add_filter (NULL, ) works for all
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:33 AM, salsaman salsa...@gmail.com wrote:
Dear Olav,
How do you know it is a bug ?
olav is being subtly sarcastic. what he's really trying to say is that
the people who work on GTK development tend to be *much* more
responsive to things being reported at
On Fri, Jan 13, 2012 at 4:51 PM, Alberto Ruiz ar...@gnome.org wrote:
I think that if we were up to do this, we should go ahead and get rid of
GtkTreeModel altogether and substitute it for something like libmodel.
The data driven app situation in GObject/Gtk+ is quite sad at the moment and
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 6:32 AM, Paolo Borelli pbore...@katamail.com wrote:
UNDO
A full undo/redo stack may belong in glib,
to me, this is highly unrealistic. undo/redo is incredibly application
(and scale) specific. even inside one application, it can make sense
to find two entirely different
On Thu, Jan 12, 2012 at 7:31 AM, Ross Burton r...@burtonini.com wrote:
Tasks has a undo manager/undoable implementation and that's
implemented by function pointers that do the right thing, so you can
probably implement both methods with that.
well, sure. i guess i was assuming that much.
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 1:44 PM, Jan Jokela janjok...@gmail.com wrote:
. But for the App to
be cohesive with the platform, the theme (the design and usability features
of widgets) must remain identical.
this notion of cohesiveness with the platform doesn't seem to bother
the developers of most
On Mon, Jan 9, 2012 at 2:05 PM, Jan Jokela janjok...@gmail.com wrote:
Take iPhoto, Calendar and similar apps, even the ones not developed by
Apple.
Many of them style widgets to a certain look and feel and most have a bunch
of custom widgets. And I see this as essential for making great
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 9:55 PM, victor-victor nada...@hotmail.com wrote:
1) my widget is a drawing area; the 2 signals are emited when I use the
mainWindow widget (that contains the drawingarea) but not the drawing area
widget in itself; I don't see where is the problem;
you set the event
On Thu, Dec 29, 2011 at 2:43 AM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
Okay, we're talking about ways to deploy an arbitrary binary
package (built somewhere else, fully out of the scope of the
users's distro) to an arbitratry location.
But: WHY ?
What is the problem that should be solved
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 3:02 AM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
ACK, that would be the quickest and easiest solution.
And I have a very strange feeling with changing ldd's lookup
semantics, beginning with serious security considerations.
But: if the application bundle should be
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 9:20 AM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
* Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com schrieb:
But: if the application bundle should be entirely self-contained,
why using dynamic linking (of non-system-libaries) at all ?
the GTK stack in particular cannot
On Wed, Dec 28, 2011 at 10:03 AM, Enrico Weigelt weig...@metux.de wrote:
* Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com schrieb:
the GTK stack in particular cannot be statically linked (certainly not
without considerable effort).
Why not, exactly ?
because quite a lot of GTK is dynamically
On Thu, Dec 22, 2011 at 7:07 PM, Hub Figuière hfigui...@teaser.fr wrote:
Supporting this concept would involve the following changes:
-API in gio to access bundle and content so that application developer
can write relocatable software. They can be designed to work either way.
there is no
On Wed, Dec 7, 2011 at 3:22 AM, Zveroy zve...@gmail.com wrote:
/* movement keys are considered locked accels */
if (!accel_mods)
{
static const guint bindings[] = {
GDK_KEY_space, GDK_KEY_KP_Space, GDK_KEY_Return, GDK_KEY_ISO_Enter,
GDK_KEY_KP_Enter, GDK_KEY_Up,
On Fri, Nov 25, 2011 at 4:08 AM, richard boaz ivor.b...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I'm attempting to get my GTK-based app packaged for delivery to MAC
platforms. Everything is going okay except for one last
implementation issue.
I suggest you read the function fixup_bundle_environment() in
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 4:34 AM, Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
Come on and stop talking bullshit. You now exactly that this is not
true. A 1st class citizen toolkit has to use the Cocoa widgets and
this will never happen for GTK.
you have some very specific definition of 1st class
On Mon, Nov 21, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Lothar Scholz llot...@web.de wrote:
If they adapt the look and feel and functions of MacOSX GUI's they
are. The menu on top, native file selection, standard toolbar,
file icons, dialog modal sheets instead of application modal,
aqua look in dialogs... using
On Sun, Nov 20, 2011 at 10:40 AM, Gour g...@atmarama.net wrote:
So, how is the project of having 'native' GTK+ on going on and is it on
par with the Qt?
most people who work with GTK don't do much work with Qt and vice
versa, so its a bit hard to answer is it on par.
this application is
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Kristian Rietveld k...@loopnest.org wrote:
Which machine is this on? If this is on Tiger, you need to build yourself a
newer make (3.71, it's in MacPorts) because things break with the (old) make
3.70 that's shipped with latest XCode for Tiger.
yes, this is
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Kristian Rietveld k...@loopnest.org wrote:
Which machine is this on? If this is on Tiger, you need to build yourself a
newer make (3.71, it's in MacPorts) because things break
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 7:56 AM, Paul Davis p...@linuxaudiosystems.com
wrote:
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 3:18 AM, Kristian Rietveld k...@loopnest.org wrote:
Which machine is this on? If this is on Tiger, you need
On Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 9:53 AM, Kristian Rietveld k...@loopnest.org wrote:
My apologies (I didn't have my Tiger machine handy), I meant that Tiger ships
with GNU make 3.80 and you need at least GNU make 3.81. This is due to usage
of $(or ...) and/or $(and ...) which are only available in
Building GTK stack on Quartz/OSX using instructions from:
http://live.gnome.org/GTK%2B/OSX/Building
*** Checking out gobject-introspection *** [8/14]
curl --continue-at - -L
http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/sources/gobject-introspection/0.10/gobject-introspection-0.10.8.tar.bz2
-o
2011/10/24 David Buchan pdbuc...@yahoo.com:
Interesting. I just tried compiling a simple non-gtk c program:
apparently you didn't use -lm
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
in another wrinkle to the continuing general difficulty of relocating
libraries that make up the gtk stack, a new issue with gio...
libgio is hardcoded at compile time to search {prefix}/gio/modules)
for its gio plugins. if an app linked against libgio executes on a
system where
On Tue, Oct 18, 2011 at 9:23 AM, Matthias Clasen
matthias.cla...@gmail.com wrote:
Not sure how I feel about the idea of relocated stacks not providing
the full glib api,
the relocated stack would (almost certainly) be providing the full API
that existed for its version. the problem is that it
On Mon, Oct 10, 2011 at 4:11 PM, John Ralls jra...@ceridwen.us wrote:
Please have a look and comment either here or directly to me.
I'd like to merge this into gtk-web master by Thursday.
looks good to me. we should also get ardour onto the ported-app list somehow.
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 5:36 PM, Matthew Bucknall
matthew.buckn...@googlemail.com wrote:
I'm trying to get my head around GTK+ 3.0's new 'Height-for-width
Geometry Management'. Sorry if I'm missing it in the documentation
somewhere, but what exactly is the definition of a widget's natural
On Sun, Sep 25, 2011 at 6:20 PM, Matthew Bucknall
matthew.buckn...@googlemail.com wrote:
What I'm not clear on is the meaning of the 'natural' arguments in
calls to gtk_widget_get_preferred_height () and
gtk_widget_get_preferred_width ().
Are the natural sizes just some sort hint to
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 12:39 AM, Jonathan S. Shapiro s...@eros-os.org wrote:
I'm new, and I'm willing to work on the issues I'm about to raise, but I
could use some guidance.
We're building a cross-platform app, and it would be nice to be on the
latest stable version of GTK+. On the main
On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 4:05 PM, Doug Blank doug.bl...@gmail.com wrote:
BTW, do you think that these fixes will have any effect on Mac OSX? I
am getting the same behavior there, and am hopeful that we can restore
functionality there too.
which behaviour? DnD on OS X with 2.24 built with the
201 - 300 of 1338 matches
Mail list logo
