Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-25 Thread kcirtap
Out of curiosity, how is Win32 support? I know that the MS-Windows theme wasn't working with 2.18 (client-side windows support needed to be added), and that on GTK.org it said that 2.16 was in a way more stable than 2.18 on the Win32 platform. Has this changed? I see that in the release notes it

Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-25 Thread Javier Jardón
2010/3/25 kcir...@lavabit.com: Out of curiosity, how is Win32 support? I know that the MS-Windows theme wasn't working with 2.18 (client-side windows support needed to be added), and that on GTK.org it said that 2.16 was in a way more stable than 2.18 on the Win32 platform. Has this

GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-24 Thread IMS
Hello, I have a question about releases. Is it usual to release a stable version (here Gtk 2.20.0) based on development librairies like Glib ??? When I try to compile I have this message : *checking for BASE_DEPENDENCIES... configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 = 2.23.6atk =

Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-24 Thread Debarshi Ray
Is it usual to release a stable version (here Gtk 2.20.0) based on development librairies like Glib ??? Yes. When I try to compile I have this message : checking for BASE_DEPENDENCIES... configure: error: Package requirements (glib-2.0 = 2.23.6    atk = 1.29.2    pango = 1.20    cairo =

Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-24 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Is it usual to release a stable version (here Gtk 2.20.0) based on development librairies like Glib ??? If you don't like it, feel free to wait then for GLib 2.24. --tml ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org

Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-24 Thread Claudio Saavedra
El mié, 24-03-2010 a las 10:47 +0100, IMS escribió: Hello, I have a question about releases. Is it usual to release a stable version (here Gtk 2.20.0) based on development librairies like Glib ??? When I try to compile I have this message : checking for BASE_DEPENDENCIES... configure:

Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-24 Thread Sergei Steshenko
--- On Wed, 3/24/10, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote: From: Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download... To: IMS ims77@gmail.com Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 3:04 AM Is it usual to release a stable version (here Gtk

Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-24 Thread David Nečas
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04:57:13AM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: --- On Wed, 3/24/10, Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi wrote: From: Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download... To: IMS ims77@gmail.com Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Date: Wednesday

Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-24 Thread IMS
: From: Tor Lillqvist t...@iki.fi Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download... To: IMS ims77@gmail.com Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 3:04 AM Is it usual to release a stable version (here Gtk 2.20.0) based on development librairies like Glib

Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-24 Thread Sergei Steshenko
--- On Wed, 3/24/10, David Nečas y...@physics.muni.cz wrote: From: David Nečas y...@physics.muni.cz Subject: Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download... To: Sergei Steshenko sergst...@yahoo.com Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Date: Wednesday, March 24, 2010, 5:03 AM On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 04

Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-24 Thread Debarshi Ray
Which part of the non-existent gtk+ release process and non-existent respect for self-established 'gnome' conventions you did not understand ? Non-existent things are always difficult to understand. Cheers, Debarshi -- One reason that life is complex is that it has a real part and an

Re: GTK+ 2.20.0 is now available for download...

2010-03-24 Thread David Nečas
On Wed, Mar 24, 2010 at 06:39:11AM -0700, Sergei Steshenko wrote: Which part of the non-existent gtk+ release process and non-existent respect for self-established 'gnome' conventions you did not understand ? None, because I cannot see any. Please enlighten me. It is normal that a stable