2015-07-16 11:17 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey balint balintreczey hu:
Hi,
Is there any chance of getting feedback on the part already
implemented or getting in contact with someone who can install the VM
in GNOME's infrastructure?
Ping?
Hey Bàlint,
I'm currently serving as the GNOME
I'll have a VM up and running very soon, in the meantime please
provide me an username you'd like to use [1] and your SSH public Key.
(mail it at accou...@gnome.org please)
I'll follow-up with the details when the machine is up.
Have a great day!
[1]
Hi Andrea,
On 07/30/2015 04:26 PM, Andrea Veri wrote:
2015-07-16 11:17 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey balint balintreczey hu:
Hi,
Is there any chance of getting feedback on the part already
implemented or getting in contact with someone who can install the VM
in GNOME's infrastructure?
Ping?
Hi Andrea,
On 07/30/2015 04:26 PM, Andrea Veri wrote:
2015-07-16 11:17 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey balint balintreczey hu:
Hi,
Is there any chance of getting feedback on the part already
implemented or getting in contact with someone who can install the VM
in GNOME's infrastructure?
Ping?
2015-07-16 11:17 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi,
Is there any chance of getting feedback on the part already
implemented or getting in contact with someone who can install the VM
in GNOME's infrastructure?
Ping?
Cheers,
Balint
2015-07-02 17:25 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey
2015-07-16 11:17 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi,
Is there any chance of getting feedback on the part already
implemented or getting in contact with someone who can install the VM
in GNOME's infrastructure?
Ping?
Cheers,
Balint
2015-07-02 17:25 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey
Hi,
Is there any chance of getting feedback on the part already
implemented of getting in contact with someone who can install the VM
in GNOME's infrastructure?
Cheers,
Balint
2015-07-02 17:25 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi Emmanuele,
Or would be nice to get some feedback
Hi,
Is there any chance of getting feedback on the part already
implemented of getting in contact with someone who can install the VM
in GNOME's infrastructure?
Cheers,
Balint
2015-07-02 17:25 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
Hi Emmanuele,
Or would be nice to get some feedback
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 4:58 PM, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
While people doing their own builds is great, I'm still going to ask
for one thing: please, help out setting up an automated builder that
takes
On Fri, Jun 19, 2015 at 2:24 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
While people doing their own builds is great, I'm still going to ask
for one thing: please, help out setting up an automated builder that
takes the GTK git repository and builds it with the Windows backend.
Tell me the
On 19/06/2015 00:24, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
It's all well and good that everybody has their own builds, and
packages, and installers — and I mean it: it's great to see so much
activity around GTK on Windows. Now, if only that translated to more
contributions to the backend code… *wink* *wink*
Hi Emmanuele,
Or would be nice to get some feedback on whether this would be a good
direction.
Who can/will set up the VM from the GTK/GNOME team?
Cheers,
Balint
On 25 Jun 2015 02:43, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Hi,
2015-06-19 2:04 GMT-07:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
Hi Emmanuele,
Or would be nice to get some feedback on whether this would be a good
direction.
Who can/will set up the VM from the GTK/GNOME team?
Cheers,
Balint
On 25 Jun 2015 02:43, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Hi,
2015-06-19 2:04 GMT-07:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
Hi,
2015-06-19 2:04 GMT-07:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
Hi;
On 19 June 2015 at 09:19, Nicola Fontana n...@entidi.it wrote:
Il Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:24:31 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com
scrisse:
...
So, let's try and get to something actionable. Can somebody try and
set up a
Hi,
2015-06-19 2:04 GMT-07:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
Hi;
On 19 June 2015 at 09:19, Nicola Fontana n...@entidi.it wrote:
Il Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:24:31 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com
scrisse:
...
So, let's try and get to something actionable. Can somebody try and
set up a
Il Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:24:31 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com scrisse:
as Daniel pointed out,
cross-compiling the introspection data is currently not possible
Hi Emmanuele,
with the current code base it is not possible but I managed to
crossbuild gobject-introspection months ago with
Il Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:24:31 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com scrisse:
as Daniel pointed out,
cross-compiling the introspection data is currently not possible
Hi Emmanuele,
with the current code base it is not possible but I managed to
crossbuild gobject-introspection months ago with
Hi;
On 19 June 2015 at 09:19, Nicola Fontana n...@entidi.it wrote:
Il Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:24:31 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com scrisse:
as Daniel pointed out,
cross-compiling the introspection data is currently not possible
Hi Emmanuele,
with the current code base it is not
Hi;
On 19 June 2015 at 09:19, Nicola Fontana n...@entidi.it wrote:
Il Fri, 19 Jun 2015 00:24:31 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com scrisse:
as Daniel pointed out,
cross-compiling the introspection data is currently not possible
Hi Emmanuele,
with the current code base it is not
On 19/06/2015 00:24, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
It's all well and good that everybody has their own builds, and
packages, and installers — and I mean it: it's great to see so much
activity around GTK on Windows. Now, if only that translated to more
contributions to the backend code… *wink* *wink*
Il Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:04:43 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com scrisse:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658126#c25
I also have an installer with Lua bindings (based on gi) that
seems to work, at least on wine. The approach is far from straight
but I was honestly
Il Fri, 19 Jun 2015 10:04:43 +0100 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com scrisse:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=658126#c25
I also have an installer with Lua bindings (based on gi) that
seems to work, at least on wine. The approach is far from straight
but I was honestly
List
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org; anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com; ML-gtk
gtk-l...@gnome.org
主旨: Re: Outdated win32 bundle
Hi;
sorry to use Daniel's email, but since this thread keeps growing, I'm
just using the latest entry point to try and give some actionable
items.
It's all well and good
List
gtk-devel-l...@gnome.org; anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com; ML-gtk
gtk-list@gnome.org
主旨: Re: Outdated win32 bundle
Hi;
sorry to use Daniel's email, but since this thread keeps growing, I'm
just using the latest entry point to try and give some actionable
items.
It's all well and good
anatoly techtonik writes:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 June 2015 at 12:27, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, we advertise ad hoc Windows builds on
anatoly techtonik writes:
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 June 2015 at 12:27, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, we advertise ad hoc Windows builds on
Hi all. I've got my own builds of Gtk+ for Windows, available at:
http://tesla.duckdns.org/jewelkit-1-0-released/ ( I have another build
I'm ready to upload in the next week actually ).
This contains perl as well as Gtk+. I make regular releases (
currently ). I also have a bunch of patches I've
Hi;
sorry to use Daniel's email, but since this thread keeps growing, I'm
just using the latest entry point to try and give some actionable
items.
It's all well and good that everybody has their own builds, and
packages, and installers — and I mean it: it's great to see so much
activity around
Hi;
sorry to use Daniel's email, but since this thread keeps growing, I'm
just using the latest entry point to try and give some actionable
items.
It's all well and good that everybody has their own builds, and
packages, and installers — and I mean it: it's great to see so much
activity around
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:26 AM, LRN lrn1...@gmail.com wrote:
On 11.06.2015 15:44, anatoly techtonik wrote:
Can GTK be cross-compiled for Windows?
It should be possible.
Just for the record, the Ardour project does automated builds of the entire
GTK(2) stack for Windows by
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
The current stance of everyone involved in the Windows backend for
GLib and GTK+ is to stop advertising binary builds for Windows — as we
don't do that for any other platform, and nobody sticks around long
enough to keep
On Jun 11, 2015, at 6:22 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:19, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro nacho.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
For the record following Emmanuele mail,
you can find an example on how to create an installer
for your application using msys2 here:
On 11.06.2015 15:44, anatoly techtonik wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Developers using the G* core platform libraries on Windows are
strongly encouraged to use the MSYS2 distribution:
https://msys2.github.io/
Like Git? Ship 200Mb of additional value on top?
Hi all,
In GStreamer we have been using, for a couple a years now, a build
system named cerbero to build and package the GStreamer SDK for Linux,
Windows, OS X, Android and iOS
(http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/download/) and we are also using it
for continuous integration with Jenkins
On Fri, Jun 12, 2015 at 2:42 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
On 12 June 2015 at 12:27, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, we advertise ad hoc Windows builds on gtk.org; those are
out of
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, we advertise ad hoc Windows builds on gtk.org; those are
out of date, and lack many of the bug fixes that went into GTK.
I see two problems here:
- [ ] http://www.gtk.org/download/win32.php - doesn't say this
Hi;
On 12 June 2015 at 12:27, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:15 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Currently, we advertise ad hoc Windows builds on gtk.org; those are
out of date, and lack many of the bug fixes that went into GTK.
I see two
Hi all,
In GStreamer we have been using, for a couple a years now, a build
system named cerbero to build and package the GStreamer SDK for Linux,
Windows, OS X, Android and iOS
(http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/download/) and we are also using it
for continuous integration with Jenkins
Would it be possible for me to fund / help maintain official GNOME
Win32 bundles and an SDK? I'd love to improve Windows support of GTK+,
but I'm never sure where the status is. Last time I tried jhbuild it
failed on something early on -- I believe fontconfig, so that was a
bummer.
On Thu, Jun
Would it be possible for me to fund / help maintain official GNOME
Win32 bundles and an SDK? I'd love to improve Windows support of GTK+,
but I'm never sure where the status is. Last time I tried jhbuild it
failed on something early on -- I believe fontconfig, so that was a
bummer.
On Thu, Jun
On Jun 11, 2015, at 6:22 AM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:19, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro nacho.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
For the record following Emmanuele mail,
you can find an example on how to create an installer
for your application using msys2 here:
I can take a look at the gobject-introspection work. Bugzilla links?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
nacho.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
wrote:
Would it be possible for me to fund / help maintain
I can take a look at the gobject-introspection work. Bugzilla links?
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 10:57 AM, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
nacho.r...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
wrote:
Would it be possible for me to fund / help maintain
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
wrote:
Would it be possible for me to fund / help maintain official GNOME
Win32 bundles and an SDK? I'd love to improve Windows support of GTK+,
but I'm never sure where the status is. Last time I tried jhbuild it
failed
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 4:51 PM, Jasper St. Pierre jstpie...@mecheye.net
wrote:
Would it be possible for me to fund / help maintain official GNOME
Win32 bundles and an SDK? I'd love to improve Windows support of GTK+,
but I'm never sure where the status is. Last time I tried jhbuild it
failed
Hey;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:19, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro nacho.r...@gmail.com wrote:
For the record following Emmanuele mail,
you can find an example on how to create an installer
for your application using msys2 here:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gedit/tree/win32
We really need to get a
Probably if we want continuous integration what we should do is to put
jhbuild up to speed on windows.
Last time I tried to build something with it, it failed but it is almost
working.
Cheers.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at 13:44, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
The current stance of everyone involved in the Windows backend for
GLib and GTK+ is to stop advertising binary builds for Windows — as we
don't
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at 13:44, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
On Mon, Jun 8, 2015 at 9:22 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
The current stance of everyone involved in the Windows backend for
GLib and GTK+ is to stop advertising binary builds for Windows — as we
don't
Hi;
On 10 June 2015 at 21:13, Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 19:22 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
I plan starting with 3.16, but got no response so far regarding my
request to access the build system.
Likely because you're using gtk-list@, which nobody in the
Hi;
On 10 June 2015 at 21:13, Stefan Salewski m...@ssalewski.de wrote:
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 19:22 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
I plan starting with 3.16, but got no response so far regarding my
request to access the build system.
Likely because you're using gtk-list@, which nobody in the
Probably if we want continuous integration what we should do is to put
jhbuild up to speed on windows.
Last time I tried to build something with it, it failed but it is almost
working.
Cheers.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:34 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at
For the record following Emmanuele mail,
you can find an example on how to create an installer
for your application using msys2 here:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gedit/tree/win32
Cheers.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at 13:44,
For the record following Emmanuele mail,
you can find an example on how to create an installer
for your application using msys2 here:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gedit/tree/win32
Cheers.
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:15 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at 13:44,
Hey;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:19, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro nacho.r...@gmail.com wrote:
For the record following Emmanuele mail,
you can find an example on how to create an installer
for your application using msys2 here:
https://git.gnome.org/browse/gedit/tree/win32
We really need to get a
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:28, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
If you want to coordinate this effort, you can use the gtk-devel-list
mailing list, and possibly join IRC to talk with the GTK developers
and the gnome.org system administrators, in order to get a CI build
going on the
Hi Emmanuele,
2015-06-08 20:22 GMT+02:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
Hi;
On 8 June 2015 at 19:02, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Hi Daniel,
2015-06-07 16:57 GMT+02:00 Daniel Espinosa eso...@gmail.com:
Please use at least Gtk+ 3.14.9 because it fixes a bug on
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:28, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
If you want to coordinate this effort, you can use the gtk-devel-list
mailing list, and possibly join IRC to talk with the GTK developers
and the gnome.org system administrators, in order to get a CI build
going on the
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:19, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro nacho.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
For the record following Emmanuele mail,
you can find an example on how to create an installer
for your application using msys2
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
Hey;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:19, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro nacho.r...@gmail.com
wrote:
For the record following Emmanuele mail,
you can find an example on how to create an installer
for your application using msys2
Hi Emmanuele,
2015-06-08 20:22 GMT+02:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
Hi;
On 8 June 2015 at 19:02, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Hi Daniel,
2015-06-07 16:57 GMT+02:00 Daniel Espinosa eso...@gmail.com:
Please use at least Gtk+ 3.14.9 because it fixes a bug on
2015-06-11 22:30 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
2015-06-11 15:34 GMT+02:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:28, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
If you want to coordinate this effort, you can use the gtk-devel-list
mailing list, and
2015-06-11 22:30 GMT+02:00 Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu:
2015-06-11 15:34 GMT+02:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:28, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
If you want to coordinate this effort, you can use the gtk-devel-list
mailing list, and
Hi,
On 06/11/2015 05:19 PM, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro wrote:
Here you have:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620566
Please consider my patches on that bug report as superseded by the work
in this mingw-w64 branch:
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/tree/mingw-w64
2015-06-11 15:34 GMT+02:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:28, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
If you want to coordinate this effort, you can use the gtk-devel-list
mailing list, and possibly join IRC to talk with the GTK developers
and the gnome.org
Hi,
On 06/11/2015 05:19 PM, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro wrote:
Here you have:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620566
Please consider my patches on that bug report as superseded by the work
in this mingw-w64 branch:
https://github.com/dieterv/gobject-introspection/tree/mingw-w64
2015-06-11 15:34 GMT+02:00 Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com:
Hi;
On 11 June 2015 at 14:28, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
If you want to coordinate this effort, you can use the gtk-devel-list
mailing list, and possibly join IRC to talk with the GTK developers
and the gnome.org
Here you have:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620566
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733535
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693531
And here you have some downstream patches:
https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/tree/master/mingw-w64-gobject-introspection
And this one:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728313
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
nacho.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you have:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620566
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733535
And this one:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=728313
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:19 PM, Ignacio Casal Quinteiro
nacho.r...@gmail.com wrote:
Here you have:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620566
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733535
Here you have:
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=620566
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=733535
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=693531
And here you have some downstream patches:
https://github.com/Alexpux/MINGW-packages/tree/master/mingw-w64-gobject-introspection
Hey,
as pointed several times please read:
https://blogs.gnome.org/nacho/2015/02/19/building-gtk-3-with-msvc-2013/
https://blogs.gnome.org/nacho/2014/08/01/how-to-build-your-gtk-application-on-windows/
Cheers.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Bill Kelly bi...@cts.com wrote:
Hi,
Emmanuele
Hey,
as pointed several times please read:
https://blogs.gnome.org/nacho/2015/02/19/building-gtk-3-with-msvc-2013/
https://blogs.gnome.org/nacho/2014/08/01/how-to-build-your-gtk-application-on-windows/
Cheers.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 8:56 PM, Bill Kelly bi...@cts.com wrote:
Hi,
Emmanuele
On Mon, 2015-06-08 at 19:22 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
I plan starting with 3.16, but got no response so far regarding my
request to access the build system.
Likely because you're using gtk-list@, which nobody in the GTK team
follows (except, I think, me).
Interesting info -- indeed I
Hi,
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Developers using the G* core platform libraries on Windows are
strongly encouraged to use the MSYS2 distribution:
https://msys2.github.io/
This will provide you with pre-built packages that are known to work
and maintained. It also allows you to build your
Hi,
Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
Developers using the G* core platform libraries on Windows are
strongly encouraged to use the MSYS2 distribution:
https://msys2.github.io/
This will provide you with pre-built packages that are known to work
and maintained. It also allows you to build your
Hi Daniel,
2015-06-07 16:57 GMT+02:00 Daniel Espinosa eso...@gmail.com:
Please use at least Gtk+ 3.14.9 because it fixes a bug on GtkFileChooser to
access Desktop directory.
I plan starting with 3.16, but got no response so far regarding my
request to access the build system.
Cheers,
Balint
I plan starting with 3.16, but got no response so far regarding my
request to access the build system.
Nothing to add to what Emmanuele stated, except that the the build machine
is a RHEL6 x86_64 system (maybe upgradable to RHEL7, have no clue) and you
can take that as a basis to create the
I plan starting with 3.16, but got no response so far regarding my
request to access the build system.
Nothing to add to what Emmanuele stated, except that the the build machine
is a RHEL6 x86_64 system (maybe upgradable to RHEL7, have no clue) and you
can take that as a basis to create the
Hi;
On 8 June 2015 at 19:02, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Hi Daniel,
2015-06-07 16:57 GMT+02:00 Daniel Espinosa eso...@gmail.com:
Please use at least Gtk+ 3.14.9 because it fixes a bug on GtkFileChooser to
access Desktop directory.
I plan starting with 3.16, but got no
Hi;
On 8 June 2015 at 19:02, Bálint Réczey bal...@balintreczey.hu wrote:
Hi Daniel,
2015-06-07 16:57 GMT+02:00 Daniel Espinosa eso...@gmail.com:
Please use at least Gtk+ 3.14.9 because it fixes a bug on GtkFileChooser to
access Desktop directory.
I plan starting with 3.16, but got no
Please use at least Gtk+ 3.14.9 because it fixes a bug on GtkFileChooser to
access Desktop directory.
El jun 7, 2015 6:23 AM, Balint Reczey bal...@balintreczey.hu escribió:
Hi,
On 01/20/2015 05:11 PM, Tarnyko wrote:
Hi,
I have an access to the win32builder.gnome.org machine, but it uses my
Hi,
On 01/20/2015 05:11 PM, Tarnyko wrote:
Hi,
I have an access to the win32builder.gnome.org machine, but it uses my
private SSH key. I guess you have to ask for access for another
account/key.
It is more a question of whether you, or anyone interested in this
discussion, feels able to
Hi,
I have an access to the win32builder.gnome.org machine, but it uses my
private SSH key. I guess you have to ask for access for another account/key.
It is more a question of whether you, or anyone interested in this
discussion, feels able to maintain the bundle (I mean, for more than a
Hi Anatoly,
2015-01-17 9:11 GMT+01:00 anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com:
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 4:22 PM, Gian Mario Tagliaretti
g.tagliare...@gmail.com wrote:
On 3 January 2015 at 21:06, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
Win32 download page at
On 3 January 2015 at 21:06, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi,
Win32 download page at http://www.gtk.org/download/win32.php lists
GTK+ 3.6.4 as the current maintained version, but
http://win32builder.gnome.org/ also lists 3.8.2 and 3.10.4 as
available. Is that
Hi,
Win32 download page at http://www.gtk.org/download/win32.php lists
GTK+ 3.6.4 as the current maintained version, but
http://win32builder.gnome.org/ also lists 3.8.2 and 3.10.4 as
available. Is that intentional?
Please, CC.
--
anatoly t.
___
If you don't mind some playing the python guys have 3.12 for windows at
pygtk
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list
On 3 January 2015 at 21:06, anatoly techtonik techto...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
Hi Anatoly,
[resending because I've sent it with the wrong email address and it's
probably stuck in the moderation queue]
Win32 download page at http://www.gtk.org/download/win32.php lists
GTK+ 3.6.4 as the current
89 matches
Mail list logo
