Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-09 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
So, no one works on fixing DirectFB backend, am I right? Regards Vasily signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part. ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-09 Thread Michael Torrie
On 04/09/2010 08:29 AM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: So, no one works on fixing DirectFB backend, am I right? Seems to me that DirectFB has fallen out of favor and that many embedded projects use the tiny Xephyr X server instead. I don't see how DirectFB has any advantage over X11 in terms of speed

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-09 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
В сообщении от 9 апреля 2010 18:01:46 автор Michael Torrie написал: On 04/09/2010 08:29 AM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: So, no one works on fixing DirectFB backend, am I right? Seems to me that DirectFB has fallen out of favor and that many embedded projects use the tiny Xephyr X server

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-09 Thread Michael Torrie
On 04/09/2010 09:20 AM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: Well, actually I need gtk+ ontop of DirectFB for two reasons: first board has accelerated DirectFB driver (and 128mb of RAM), and second has only 32mb of RAM (and no accelerated DirectFB driver) I'll need to write X graphics driver to get

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-09 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
В сообщении от 9 апреля 2010 20:18:44 автор Michael Torrie написал: I can't speak for the acceleration issue, but I am pretty sure that 32 mb of RAM is plenty for running an X-based GTK on the Xephyr X server. Even 8 years ago I ran GTK on X11 on a 32 MB ram handheld computer using Kdrive,

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-09 Thread Michael Torrie
On 04/09/2010 11:28 AM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: According to Xephyr README, Xephyr is a kdrive server that outputs to a window on a pre-existing 'host' X display, maybe you mean Xfbdev (kdrive-based), not Xephyr? I believe you are correct. It has been years since I messed with this

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-09 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
В сообщении от 9 апреля 2010 20:47:58 автор Michael Torrie написал: On 04/09/2010 11:28 AM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: According to Xephyr README, Xephyr is a kdrive server that outputs to a window on a pre-existing 'host' X display, maybe you mean Xfbdev (kdrive-based), not Xephyr? I

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-09 Thread Michael Torrie
On 04/09/2010 12:20 PM, Vasily Khoruzhick wrote: Anyway, thanks for suggestion ;) Hope it works out for you. Xfbdev/kdrive definitely seems like the best option. Hope you can make it work. In the long run, the DirectFB route is a dead-end. Here's a link to the OpenWrt config for building it

Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-08 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
Hi, As you may know, DirectFB backend of gtk+ in recent versions is heavily broken, and I want to know if anyone working on fixing DirectFB backend :) I was able to fix crash by applying 2 patches (attached) from André Draszik, and now simple gtk apps works, but that's not enough for complete

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-08 Thread Javier Jardón
2010/4/8 Vasily Khoruzhick anars...@gmail.com: Hi, As you may know, DirectFB backend of gtk+ in recent versions is heavily broken, and I want to know if anyone working on fixing DirectFB backend :) I was able to fix crash by applying 2 patches (attached) from André Draszik, and now simple

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-08 Thread Ersin Akinci
Does anyone know what versions of gtk+ *do* work well with the directfb backend? I e-mailed this list asking for help in compiling gtk+ programs with only the directfb backend and never got a response (I did eventually fix it, it was a problem with my setup), but I haven't yet tried compiling

RE: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-08 Thread Paul Stuart
: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:08 AM To: Javier Jardón Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB Does anyone know what versions of gtk+ *do* work well with the directfb backend? I e-mailed this list asking for help in compiling gtk+ programs with only the directfb backend

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-08 Thread Ersin Akinci
. From: gtk-list-boun...@gnome.org [gtk-list-boun...@gnome.org] On Behalf Of Ersin Akinci [ersin.aki...@gmail.com] Sent: Thursday, April 08, 2010 9:08 AM To: Javier Jardón Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org Subject: Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB Does anyone know what versions

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-08 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
В сообщении от 8 апреля 2010 19:08:47 автор Ersin Akinci написал: Does anyone know what versions of gtk+ *do* work well with the directfb backend? I e-mailed this list asking for help in compiling gtk+ programs with only the directfb backend and never got a response (I did eventually fix it,

Re: Recent gtk+ on DirectFB

2010-04-08 Thread Vasily Khoruzhick
В сообщении от 8 апреля 2010 18:57:53 автор Javier Jardón написал: 2010/4/8 Vasily Khoruzhick anars...@gmail.com: Hi, As you may know, DirectFB backend of gtk+ in recent versions is heavily broken, and I want to know if anyone working on fixing DirectFB backend :) I was able to