Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-03 Thread John Pye
Hi Paul Paul Davis wrote: On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:11 AM, John Pyej...@curioussymbols.com wrote: As I understand it, using jhbuild will allow me to conveniently switch between release tarballs and svn HEAD. It's also ensuring that dependencies are built in correct order, so I'm pretty

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-03 Thread John Pye
John Pye wrote: Tor Lillqvist wrote: Is there a buildbot somewhere running continuous integration testing of GTK+ with the Mac platform? What about other platforms? Is that something that the community is lacking in order to progress this stuff? Depends on what you mean with

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-03 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Does GTK on Windows currently build entirely with MinGW, Yes it does. It is much easier to cross-compile it from Linux than to set up a working build environment on Windows natively, though. (Although, once you have such an environment, it does work more or less as well as on Unix.) So I would

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-03 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Can you point me at a particular project on OBS? The repository http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/windows:/mingw:/win32/openSUSE_10.3/ for 32-bit binaries, and http://download.opensuse.org/repositories/windows:/mingw:/win64/openSUSE_10.3/ for 64-bit ones. The Windows binaries are in

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-02 Thread John Pye
Hi Paul Paul Davis wrote: On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:18 PM, John Pyej...@curioussymbols.com wrote: There's no PyGTK binary available anywhere for OS X. The only route seems to be to use 'jhbuild' and John Ralls' instructions from gtk-osx.sf.net. This seems unnecessarily difficult after the

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-02 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Is there a buildbot somewhere running continuous integration testing of GTK+ with the Mac platform? What about other platforms? Is that something that the community is lacking in order to progress this stuff? Depends on what you mean with buildbot. I guess buildbots are usually used to

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-02 Thread Paul Davis
On Wed, Sep 2, 2009 at 2:11 AM, John Pyej...@curioussymbols.com wrote: As I understand it, using jhbuild will allow me to conveniently switch between release tarballs and svn HEAD. It's also ensuring that dependencies are built in correct order, so I'm pretty happy to be using that for the

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-02 Thread Javier Jardón
2009/9/2 John Pye j...@curioussymbols.com: Is there a buildbot somewhere running continuous integration testing of GTK+ with the Mac platform? What about other platforms? Is that something that the community is lacking in order to progress this stuff? For other platforms (basically linux), you

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-02 Thread John Pye
Hi Tor Tor Lillqvist wrote: Is there a buildbot somewhere running continuous integration testing of GTK+ with the Mac platform? What about other platforms? Is that something that the community is lacking in order to progress this stuff? Depends on what you mean with buildbot. I guess

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-01 Thread Tobias Weber
On 01.09.2009, at 06:53, John Pye wrote: I believe there is some way to build a native OSX 'variant' of GTK using MacPorts. http://www.flyn.org/apple/ First paragraph worked for me, except for occasional unpredictable bus errors. Also threading always crashes. Should a developer include

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-01 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Does the organisation have a plan to resolve the outstanding bugs and features in gtk-quartz? What the organisation? --tml ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-09-01 Thread Paul Davis
On Mon, Aug 31, 2009 at 8:18 PM, John Pyej...@curioussymbols.com wrote: There's no PyGTK binary available anywhere for OS X. The only route seems to be to use 'jhbuild' and John Ralls' instructions from gtk-osx.sf.net. This seems unnecessarily difficult after the pleasant experience of getting

Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-08-31 Thread John Pye
Hi all I recently did some work trying to port my program, ASCEND, for the Mac OS X platform. It's a GPL program using PyGTK for its GUI. I'm a regular Linux user, but I figured that adding OS X support could be useful for expanding our user base, so I got hold of a Mac and I'm trying to make

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-08-31 Thread Marius Schamschula
John, On the Mac most installs use either MacPorts www.macports.org or Fink fink.sf.net to do the heavy lifting. I think your question should be: Do Mac users need access to GTK+? The answer is absolutely. On Aug 31, 2009, at 7:18 PM, John Pye wrote: Hi all I recently did some work

Re: Status of GTK+ on Mac OS X?

2009-08-31 Thread John Pye
Hi Marius Marius Schamschula wrote: John, On the Mac most installs use either MacPorts www.macports.org http://www.macports.org or Fink fink.sf.net to do the heavy lifting. I have tried the Fink version of GTK but it's not available as a binary (for some reason the distribution of binary