[Gtk-sharp-list] 64bit Gtk# for windows

2008-09-16 Thread Jaroslav Šmíd
Ok, no one is interested, no one answered ... I made it alone. It wasn't as tough as I thought it'd be. I took *-sharp.dll libraries from ArchLinux and only compiled *glue.dll libraries against 64bit Gtk+ libraries using mingw-w64. 64bit Gtk libraries can be found at gtk homepage, 64bit

Re: [Gtk-sharp-list] 64bit Gtk# for windows

2008-09-16 Thread Jaroslav Šmíd
BTW it's version 2.12, no cairo C# lib included (yet). Jaroslav Šmíd wrote: Ok, no one is interested, no one answered ... I made it alone. It wasn't as tough as I thought it'd be. I took *-sharp.dll libraries from ArchLinux and only compiled *glue.dll libraries against 64bit Gtk+ libraries

[Gtk-sharp-list] Crash when closing a gtk window

2008-09-16 Thread Anders Rune Jensen
Hi I have a problem where closing a Gtk.Window (not the main) of a program crashes with mono 2.0 rc1 and gtk-sharp svn but not with mono 1.2.6 and older version of gtk-sharp. So problem in installation, mono or gtk-sharp? The error I get is: Marshaling button_press_event signal Exception in

Re: [Gtk-sharp-list] pinvoke and benchmarks

2008-09-16 Thread Chris Howie
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Martin (OpenGeoMap) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: is it better used a library only created with C or the pinvoke is fast??? In my imagination i see the pinvoke system trying to find a funtion every time and if i have 10 million of lidar data perhaps this is really

Re: [Gtk-sharp-list] Crash when closing a gtk window

2008-09-16 Thread Mike Kestner
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 18:01 +0200, Anders Rune Jensen wrote: Hi I have a problem where closing a Gtk.Window (not the main) of a program crashes with mono 2.0 rc1 and gtk-sharp svn but not with mono 1.2.6 and older version of gtk-sharp. So problem in installation, mono or gtk-sharp? The

Re: [Gtk-sharp-list] 64bit Gtk# for windows

2008-09-16 Thread Mike Kestner
On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Jaroslav Šmíd wrote: Ok, no one is interested, no one answered ... I made it alone. It wasn't as tough as I thought it'd be. I took *-sharp.dll libraries from ArchLinux and only compiled *glue.dll libraries against 64bit Gtk+ libraries using mingw-w64.

Re: [Gtk-sharp-list] 64bit Gtk# for windows

2008-09-16 Thread Jaroslav Šmíd
Mike Kestner wrote: On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Jaroslav Šmíd wrote: Ok, no one is interested, no one answered ... I made it alone. It wasn't as tough as I thought it'd be. I took *-sharp.dll libraries from ArchLinux and only compiled *glue.dll libraries against 64bit Gtk+

Re: [Gtk-sharp-list] 64bit Gtk# for windows

2008-09-16 Thread Michael Hutchinson
On Tue, Sep 16, 2008 at 1:09 PM, Mike Kestner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, 2008-09-16 at 13:45 +0200, Jaroslav Šmíd wrote: Ok, no one is interested, no one answered ... I made it alone. It wasn't as tough as I thought it'd be. I took *-sharp.dll libraries from ArchLinux and only compiled

Re: [Gtk-sharp-list] pinvoke and benchmarks

2008-09-16 Thread Michael Hutchinson
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 11:22 AM, Martin (OpenGeoMap) [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi: Someone knows about the performance in a library used only with c# or used thanks to other C API??? I am working in a bindings to mono and .NET in c# for lidar data and i see my program really really slowly