Re: [Gtk2hs-devel] Moving gtk2hs, gtksourceview and webkit to git and github

2013-10-05 Thread Ben Gamari
Hamish Mackenzie hamish.k.macken...@gmail.com writes: Ben suggested it might be a good way to make it easier for people to contribute. I agree. There are lots of great tools for git (I use SmartGit all the time) and we can set up Travis-CI. +1 pgpUnAs1S0Hjv.pgp Description: PGP signature

Re: [Gtk2hs-devel] Cabal 1.18

2013-09-24 Thread Ben Gamari
Ben Gamari bgamari.f...@gmail.com writes: After having demonstrated to myself repeatedly that I'm incapable of operating Darcs correctly, I finally broke down and imported Gtk2hs into Git. My cabal-1.18 branch[1] has the current state of my work to get Gtk2hs building with Cabal 1.18. My

[Gtk2hs-devel] Package name and gtk3

2013-09-22 Thread Ben Gamari
Since Daniel Wagner's patch[1] from 11 July 2012, gtk/gtk.cabal in the gtk2hs repository declares the package name to be gtk3. This is a fine approach to take for differentiating the Gtk3 bindings from their Gtk2 counterparts but the implementation needs to be finished. In addition to editing

Re: [Gtk2hs-devel] Cabal 1.18

2013-09-20 Thread Ben Gamari
Dominic Steinitz domi...@steinitz.org writes: Hi Ben, I have pull request against your 1.18 branch which fixes backwards compatibility (untested on 1.16). Awesome! That's a pretty clever hack although it still irks me that the interface was changed on the Cabal side in the first place. Is

[Gtk2hs-devel] Cabal 1.18

2013-09-18 Thread Ben Gamari
After having demonstrated to myself repeatedly that I'm incapable of operating Darcs correctly, I finally broke down and imported Gtk2hs into Git. My cabal-1.18 branch[1] has the current state of my work to get Gtk2hs building with Cabal 1.18. My intention is to export these patches to apply