On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 09:53 -0500, Arbol One wrote:
The lack of concern GTK+ has shown for MS has me worried.
I agree. But this is something that has to happen at the GTK+ level first.
I won't spend time working on it until there is a real GTK+ 3 distribution for
windows.
I need it too, because
On Sun, 2012-11-25 at 14:27 +0800, Chow Loong Jin wrote:
Genius might have limitations, but stupidity is no handicap
Sorry, but I don't understand. What are you trying to say here?
(Also, please do not CC me)
I have warned Arbol One twice already about these inappropriate email footers.
On 27/11/2012 16:11, Murray Cumming wrote:
I have warned Arbol One twice already about these inappropriate email footers.
One more time and I'll remove him from the list.
Actually, my reply wasn't addressed at the email footer, and I don't really see
it as particularly inappropriate either. I
First and foremost sir, you have never warned me of anything, you have
previously questioned my intentions regarding my footnotes, and as I explained
to you before I explain to you one-more-time, it is a statement of reasoning
(http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index?qid=20090113185803AAEvVyj),
2012-11-26 21:08, Moh B. skrev:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 01:21 +0700, l...@secy.biz wrote:
Hello all.
I have already given a link to examples of gtkmm 2.4 but I changed the hard
drive and lost the link. I ask you to give me a link to examples of gtkmm 2.4 +
glade.
Also, if there is
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 16:25 +0100, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
2012-11-26 21:08, Moh B. skrev:
On Tue, 2012-11-27 at 01:21 +0700, l...@secy.biz wrote:
Hello all.
I have already given a link to examples of gtkmm 2.4 but I changed the
hard drive and lost the link. I ask you to give me a link