On 08/12/2013 12:55 AM, Gavin Lambert wrote:
Quoth L. D. James:
Thanks Gavin I'm glad that your message suggests that I may have done
something right. I have tried. I appreciate your pointing out about
bugs in gtkmm. I'm sure with my investigation I'll eventually learn
about the bugs and
Oops, I see now that the gtkmm-2.9x versions (2.90, 2.91, 2.99) are
actually unstable very early versions of gtkmm-3. They can probably only
be used together with equally early versions of gtk+-3. I recommend that
you don't use them. If you need gtkmm-2, use gtkmm-2.24.4, if you have
I'm building gtkmm on Windows (using MSVC). Rather than building from a
tarball I'm using the git sources (which means me having to build all
the auto-generated stuff, using gmmproc etc). Everything builds pretty
well. I've even built glibmm, atkmm and pangomm the same way. The only
hiccup
It depends on which version of glibmm (and thus gmmproc) you use. The
same bug is mentioned in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697835#c16 (glibmm version
unknown).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697835#c21 shows a different
result with glibmm 2.32.0.
The gtkmm 2.24.4
On 12/08/2013 18:25, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
It depends on which version of glibmm (and thus gmmproc) you use. The
same bug is mentioned in
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697835#c16 (glibmm version
unknown).
https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=697835#c21 shows a
different
You're right, the latest version of glibmm (gmmproc) generates erroneous
code. I thought it was an old version that did that. This is something I
should look into, I think.
Anyway, you will have other problems if you let a new version of gmmproc
generate code for gtkmm 2.24.4. That's what bug
On 12 Aug 2013, at 20:32, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
You're right, the latest version of glibmm (gmmproc) generates erroneous
code. I thought it was an old version that did that. This is something I
should look into, I think.
Anyway, you will have other problems if you let a new version of
