Re: g_hash_table

2013-03-06 Thread Jens Georg
[ g_hash_table_* missing ] This isn't a criticism BTW. I'm just curious to know why it's missing. I suppose there's no real need to bind that with std::map and std::hash available. ___ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org

Re: g_hash_table

2013-02-23 Thread Andrew Potter
On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 11:41 PM, John Emmas john...@tiscali.co.uk wrote: Today I downloaded the latest source code, assuming that g_hash_table would be implemented by now but it still seems to be missing. I just wondered if there's a reason? Isn't 'g_hash_table' suitable for incorporating

g_hash_table

2013-02-22 Thread John Emmas
copy is about 2-3 years old now, although it works fine and mostly does everything we need. However, it seems to be missing a class to wrap the g_hash_table_* range of functions. Today I downloaded the latest source code, assuming that g_hash_table would be implemented by now but it still seems