On Sat, Mar 23, 2024 at 11:09 AM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-03-20 at 16:40 -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 4:29 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > > So I can confirm that JIT indeed doesn't work right now on 64-bit
> > > MinGW, but it's relatively easy to fix
On Wed, 2024-03-20 at 16:40 -0400, Thompson, David wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 4:29 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > So I can confirm that JIT indeed doesn't work right now on 64-bit
> > MinGW, but it's relatively easy to fix (first patch). In essence
> > lightening was getting the calling
On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 4:29 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>
> So I can confirm that JIT indeed doesn't work right now on 64-bit
> MinGW, but it's relatively easy to fix (first patch). In essence
> lightening was getting the calling convention wrong.
Wow! Have you seen the JIT do its thing (via
On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 21:29 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list
for Guile, the GNU extensibility library wrote:
> On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 15:23 -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:19 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 09:19 -0500, Thompson,
On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 15:23 -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:19 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 09:19 -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:40 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list for
> > > Guile, the GNU extensibility
On Wed, Feb 7, 2024 at 3:19 PM Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 09:19 -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:40 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list for
> > Guile, the GNU extensibility library wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 22:04 +0100, Jonas
On Wed, 2024-02-07 at 09:19 -0500, Thompson, David wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:40 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list for
> Guile, the GNU extensibility library wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 22:04 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > >
> > > Ping, any comments on this approach? I
On Thu, Jan 4, 2024 at 5:40 AM Jonas Hahnfeld via Developers list for
Guile, the GNU extensibility library wrote:
>
> On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 22:04 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> >
> > Ping, any comments on this approach? I built binaries for LilyPond
> > 2.25.10 using these patches applied on top
Jonas Hahnfeld via "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library"
writes:
> On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 22:04 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>> On Sun, 2023-10-29 at 22:34 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
>> > I would like to propose a different approach: It turns out to be
>> > possible to
On Tue, 2023-11-28 at 22:04 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> On Sun, 2023-10-29 at 22:34 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> > On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 20:50 +, Mike Gran wrote:
> > > Hello Guile,
> >
> > Hi Mike,
> >
> > I'm sorry for "necrobumping" this thread; I wanted to reply back in
> > June but
Jonas Hahnfeld via "Developers list for Guile, the GNU extensibility library"
writes:
>> What do you and others think of this approach, would this be "more"
>> acceptable to land in main?
>
> Ping, any comments on this approach? I built binaries for LilyPond
> 2.25.10 using these patches
On Sun, 2023-10-29 at 22:34 +0100, Jonas Hahnfeld wrote:
> On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 20:50 +, Mike Gran wrote:
> > Hello Guile,
>
> Hi Mike,
>
> I'm sorry for "necrobumping" this thread; I wanted to reply back in
> June but didn't have enough time to work through what I will explain
> further
On Tue, 2023-06-06 at 20:50 +, Mike Gran wrote:
> Hello Guile,
Hi Mike,
I'm sorry for "necrobumping" this thread; I wanted to reply back in
June but didn't have enough time to work through what I will explain
further below. In any case, I would very much like to see good Windows
64-bit
Hey Guile-
So I'm still plugging away at this Guile on Windows stuff.
In a tree on Github [1], I started from the top and cleaned up
the 64-bit Cygwin and MSYS problems. Cygwin and MSYS
are two related projects where you compile with GCC,
with the newlib C library, and a link to a library that
Op 08-06-2023 om 22:46 schreef Mike Gran:
But when I get back to it, I'll try to be more precise
1. long or long long - an integer that is "big" in some general sense
2. int64_t - an integer that needs to be 64-bit because may hold a large integer
3. intptr_t - an integer that holds a pointer
> (The following response is a bit muddled -- it initially says I don't
> follow but later I will. Still, there is some stuff of which I really
> disagree with the implementation.)
> I don't quite follow why the change from 'long' to 'intptr_t'. I mean,
> reading the commit message you linked
Op 06-06-2023 om 22:50 schreef Mike Gran:
Hello Guile,
There have been a few times where I made Guile work on
MinGW -- usually the 32-bit, unthreaded variety -- because I wanted it
for my own entertainment. Often around the time of the Lisp Game Jam.
The Game Jam just happened, so I was
On Tuesday, June 6, 2023 at 02:10:25 PM PDT, Thompson, David
wrote:
...
>> Janneke has also poked at Windows support a few times as well, and
>> he actually got it to run on 64-bit Windows.
>Did JIT work? When I tried this years ago it didn't. Would be a major
>victory if it works now.
Hello Guile,
There have been a few times where I made Guile work on
MinGW -- usually the 32-bit, unthreaded variety -- because I wanted it
for my own entertainment. Often around the time of the Lisp Game Jam.
The Game Jam just happened, so I was poking it again. Although
I never actually
19 matches
Mail list logo
