Re: [PATCH] Add resolve-relative-reference in (web uri), as in RFC 3986 5.2.

Op 04-10-2023 om 07:29 schreef Vivien Kraus: Le mercredi 04 octobre 2023 à 00:30 +0200, Maxime Devos a écrit :       The best prevention is not allowing redirects at all or only       allowing redirections that keep the hostname intact -- while an       option for much software, it isn't

Re: [BUG] Non-local exit in thunk from system-async-mark doesn't restore asyncs block

Op 06-10-2023 om 06:50 schreef Andrew Tropin: TLDR: abort-to-prompt restores asyncs block level. abort-to-prompt from a procedure scheduled with system-async-mark doesn't restort asyncs block level. Looks like a duplicate or variant of to

Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] load: Display modules depth in output when using %load-verbosely.

Op 04-10-2023 om 03:42 schreef Maxim Cournoyer: %load-hook is carefully crafted as to accept both one or two arguments (for backward compatibility). I didn't pay attention to %load-announce and I'm surprised it's a public API, as its sole function seems to be the default %load-hook value.

Re: [PATCH] add SRFI-119 / language/wisp to Guile? (new patch, squashed)

"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" writes: > "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" writes: > >> "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" writes: OK. I assumed you already emailed ass...@gnu.org the relevant form, right? Let us know how it goes. >> I now sent a request to be sent the papers to sign to

Re: [PATCH v4 4/4] load: Display modules depth in output when using %load-verbosely.

Hi Maxime, Maxime Devos writes: [...] > I now see: > >> + /* For compatibility with older load hooks procedures, fall-back to >> + calling it with a single argument if calling it with two fails. */ >> + scm_internal_catch (scm_from_latin1_symbol ("wrong-number-of-args"), >> +