On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 9:07 PM Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
wrote:
>
> Damien Mattei writes:
>
>
> > by keeping the same
> > number of parenthesis, but they are just differents : ( ), { }, [ ]
> > and it allow the use of infix expressions.
>
> Is your implementation of {} compatible with
Damien Mattei writes:
> i just add a #; support in Scheme+ :
> https://github.com/damien-mattei/Scheme-PLUS-for-Guile
> Scheme+ is an extension syntax to Scheme. It goes in the opposite direction
> of Wisp or Rhombus (based on Racket)
Note that Wisp and Rhombus differ: Wisp is just Scheme
Damien Mattei writes:
> On Sat, Jan 20, 2024 at 9:07 PM Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide
> wrote:
> Damien Mattei writes:
> > by keeping the same
> > number of parenthesis, but they are just differents : ( ), { }, [ ]
> > and it allow the use of infix expressions.
>
> Is your implementation of
hello Christina,
i just add a #; support in Scheme+ :
https://github.com/damien-mattei/Scheme-PLUS-for-Guile
Scheme+ is an extension syntax to Scheme. It goes in the opposite direction
of Wisp or Rhombus (based on Racket) by keeping the same number of
parenthesis, but they are just differents :
