On 2024-04-20 02:49, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
Have you looked at Guile's OOP system GOOPS?
Thanks, Mikael.
I have implemented a number of object systems, including CLOS style
systems such as GOOPS.
The mismatch here is in the overhead of the multimethod dispatch.
I would like something
Then, of course, mapping language onto another complex system is perhaps
seldom a good idea. Still, it is one way to create a new type of object.
And, generic functions on such objects could still provide for a nice
implementation of Smalltalk, even if you can't map the OOP systems onto
eachother.
Hi Ken,
Have you looked at Guile's OOP system GOOPS?
Chances are that you would get many required mechanisms for free. You get
classes that can be instantiated. You could possibly implement messages as
generic functions. The generic messages/generic functions already support
keyword arguments,
On 2024-04-17 09:34, Maxime Devos wrote:
> LICENSE says 'Copyright (c) 2016', but some files date from 2024. It's a bit
> inconsistent ... Do you mean that changes >2016 are public domain, or not
> covered by BSD license, or the inconsistency is an oversight?
Ah. Thanks.
I used Larceny
>is to get the mechanics working. For this I
> need to have an St-Object which is basically a Vector but which
> answers #false to vector? and #true to st-object?
>
> [Note https://github.com/KenDickey/Crosstalk/blob/master/st-kernel.scm ]
>
> I note that one might change the T7 type-tag from
LICENSE says ‘Copyright (c) 2016’, but some files date from 2024. It’s a bit
inconsistent … Do you mean that changes >2016 are public domain, or not covered
by BSD license, or the inconsistency is an oversight?
Basile,
Thank you much for the thoughtful reply.
On 4/16/24 23:14, ken.dic...@whidbey.com wrote:
..
I am looking at porting a toy Smalltalk-in-Scheme implementation to
Guile.
On 2024-04-17 00:10, Basile Starynkevitch wrote:
..
I think it depends upon your goals; I assume your x86-64
(sorry, resending as plain text to guile-user)
On 4/16/24 23:14, ken.dic...@whidbey.com wrote:
Greetings,
I am looking at porting a toy Smalltalk-in-Scheme implementation to
Guile.
[Note https://github.com/KenDickey/Crosstalk ].
On github I (Basile Starynkevitch) am
On 4/16/24 23:14, ken.dic...@whidbey.com wrote:
Greetings,
I am looking at porting a toy Smalltalk-in-Scheme implementation to
Guile.
[Note https://github.com/KenDickey/Crosstalk ].
On github I (Basile Starynkevitch) am https://github.com/bstarynk and
contributing to
Greetings,
I am looking at porting a toy Smalltalk-in-Scheme implementation to
Guile.
[Note https://github.com/KenDickey/Crosstalk ].
The idea is for simplicity first, then making into a module and
potentially evolving Smalltalk into a supported, compiled ",language" in
the Guile way.
10 matches
Mail list logo
