> My question is: Do the ... in the case
>
> ((test id _kt _kf) _kt) ...
>
> produce one case for each identifier in the list?
Yes, they do.
> I am guessing that this is what they do. However, they are mentioned as
> literals in the inner syntax-rules,
No, they aren't. The (id ...) form
Hello Jean!
On 3/15/24 09:03, Jean Abou Samra wrote:
My question is: Do the ... in the case
((test id _kt _kf) _kt) ...
produce one case for each identifier in the list?
Yes, they do.
I am guessing that this is what they do. However, they are mentioned as
literals in the inner
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:00:09PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
> > I think most of Guile user actually want this feature for a long time.
> > I can understand.
> I agree.
so do I.
--
Marc Chantreux
Pôle CESAR (Calcul et services avancés à la recherche)
Université de Strasbourg
14 rue René
On 3/15/24 1:52 PM, Matt Wette wrote:
On 3/15/24 1:47 PM, Marc Chantreux wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:00:09PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
I think most of Guile user actually want this feature for a long time.
I can understand.
I agree.
so do I.
As mentioned on another topic
On 3/15/24 1:47 PM, Marc Chantreux wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 08:00:09PM +0100, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
I think most of Guile user actually want this feature for a long time.
I can understand.
I agree.
so do I.
As mentioned on another topic (start=up message) I had once hacked guile
to
I am in the process of rewriting in Guile a script that I use regularly.
Running Guile 3.0.9, when I execute a file containing
#!/usr/local/bin/guile -s
!#
(display "Hello, mailing list!")
(newline)
the following is printed to standard error:
;;; note: source file
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024, ks...@sent.com wrote:
> I am in the process of rewriting in Guile a script that I use
> regularly. Running Guile 3.0.9, when I execute a file containing
>
> #!/usr/local/bin/guile -s
> !#
> (display "Hello, mailing list!")
> (newline)
>
> the following is printed to
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 01:31:43PM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024, ks...@sent.com wrote:
> > I am in the process of rewriting in Guile a script that I use
> > regularly. Running Guile 3.0.9, when I execute a file containing
[...]
> Like the warning says, you ought to either use
On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 02:51:51PM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024, Keith Wright wrote:
> > Olivier Dion writes:
[supress auto-compilation warnings]
> >> Not possible unfortunately :-(
> >
> > Why would this be unfortunate? This seems like a feature (non-bug).
>
> I think
Hello,
On 2024-03-15 12:15:33 -0500, ks...@sent.com wrote:
> I am in the process of rewriting in Guile a script that I use regularly.
> Running Guile 3.0.9, when I execute a file containing
>
> #!/usr/local/bin/guile -s
> !#
> (display "Hello, mailing list!")
> (newline)
>
> the
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024, wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 15, 2024 at 01:31:43PM -0400, Olivier Dion wrote:
>> On Fri, 15 Mar 2024, ks...@sent.com wrote:
>> > I am in the process of rewriting in Guile a script that I use
>> > regularly. Running Guile 3.0.9, when I execute a file containing
>
> [...]
>
>> Like
Olivier Dion writes:
>>> Like the warning says, you ought to either use the GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE
>>> environment variable or use the `--no-auto-compile' switch.
>>> Unfortunately, there is no `--quiet' or `--warning=/dev/null' option.
>>
>> I think the OP is fine with autocompilation (I even guess
On Fri, 15 Mar 2024, Keith Wright wrote:
> Olivier Dion writes:
>
Like the warning says, you ought to either use the GUILE_AUTO_COMPILE
environment variable or use the `--no-auto-compile' switch.
Unfortunately, there is no `--quiet' or `--warning=/dev/null' option.
>>>
>>> I think
13 matches
Mail list logo
