Joshua Branson writes:
> (I mean it
> works on the Hurd also, but I have never encountered a Hurd user in real
> life)
Really? I found tons of bugs in the Hurd port, causing it to not even
boot properly.
--
Akib Azmain Turja
This message is signed by me with my GnuPG key. It's fingerprint
On 2022-07-11, Vagrant Cascadian wrote:
> I hear Efraim say better to have unique randomness and no substitutes,
> and I hear Tobias say more or less it's ok as long as upstream is right
> about it being ok to embed a specific prime as other random numbers get
> mixed in at runtime...
Well, now
On 2022-06-28, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice wrote:
>>I am at a loss as to what to do then ... nothing and just have it be
>>unreproducible? embed a specific random number? come up with better
>>upstreamable patches?
>
> From upstream's response and my own biases and my reading of the room here,
> I'd
indieterminacy writes:
>
> I recall dicussing this topic area with you last year:
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2021-06/msg00080.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2021-06/msg00082.html
> https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/help-guix/2021-06/msg00083.html
>
On 12-07-2022 00:44, Joshua Branson wrote:
Sorry for starting this centuries flame war, but I can't help but be
more and more impressed with OpenBSD. It seems ideal for small scale
servers (aka NOT large databases). It tries really hard to be secure
by
default and has great documentation.
Sorry for starting this centuries flame war, but I can't help but be
more and more impressed with OpenBSD. It seems ideal for small scale
servers (aka NOT large databases). It tries really hard to be secure by
default and has great documentation. With OpenBSD it is easy to set up
a static
On Mon, Jul 11, 2022 at 02:10:36AM -0500, jgart wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Should we package this mode separately from lilypond as emacs-lilypond-mode?
>
> https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;f=elisp;h=dc4d450a9f98433d04ac87057571ab58f98497c5;hb=HEAD
>
> all best,
>
> jgart
I
On Fri, 08 Jul 2022 at 18:53, Liliana Marie Prikler
wrote:
> We don't typically propagate packages, especially not gcc-toolchain.
> You should be able to swap that out for any other toolchain, e.g.
> another version of gcc-toolchain or perhaps even clang-toolchain. I'm
> not sure about
Hi,
Should we package this mode separately from lilypond as emacs-lilypond-mode?
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/gitweb/?p=lilypond.git;a=tree;f=elisp;h=dc4d450a9f98433d04ac87057571ab58f98497c5;hb=HEAD
all best,
jgart
