Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

2022-10-06 Thread Joshua Branson
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > jbra...@dismail.de skribis: > >> I just created a debbugs-guix.el file in debbugs. The update should be >> available on elpa by now. >> >> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/56987 > > Nice! So that’ll be part of the next ‘emacs-debbugs’ package, right? > Yes sir!

Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

2022-10-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, jbra...@dismail.de skribis: > I just created a debbugs-guix.el file in debbugs. The update should be > available on elpa by now. > > https://issues.guix.gnu.org/56987 Nice! So that’ll be part of the next ‘emacs-debbugs’ package, right? Ludo’.

Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

2022-10-06 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Christopher Baines skribis: > data.guix.gnu.org just tracks the master branch, and doesn't delete any > data. > > data.qa.guix.gnu.org tracks all branches in the main Guix repository, > plus branches for issues, and regularly deletes revisions where they're > either old or the branch no

Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

2022-10-05 Thread jbranso
October 1, 2022 1:08 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote: > Hello! > > As discussed in Paris, I’m a big fan of qa.guix.gnu.org! I like that it > shows all the information relevant to packagers and reviewers in a > concise way. > > I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a >

Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

2022-10-05 Thread Christopher Baines
Ludovic Courtès writes: > Hi, > > Christopher Baines skribis: > >> Ludovic Courtès writes: >> >>> I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a >>> bit confused by the numbers in this example: >>> >>> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/58186 >>> >>> The numbers

Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

2022-10-05 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi, Christopher Baines skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: > >> I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a >> bit confused by the numbers in this example: >> >> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/58186 >> >> The numbers before/after patches don’t match and the lint

Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

2022-10-01 Thread Christopher Baines
Ludovic Courtès writes: > I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a > bit confused by the numbers in this example: > > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/58186 > > The numbers before/after patches don’t match and the lint warnings (nice > addition!) appear to unrelated

Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

2022-10-01 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hello! As discussed in Paris, I’m a big fan of qa.guix.gnu.org! I like that it shows all the information relevant to packagers and reviewers in a concise way. I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a bit confused by the numbers in this example:

Re: Progress with automating testing of patches

2022-09-19 Thread Christopher Baines
Christopher Baines writes: > Since it's easier to iterate once there's something visible, I've just > stuck what I've got so far on the internet, it's available at: > > https://qa.guix.gnu.org/ > > The code is here [3] and I've put a list of ideas in the README. > > 3:

Progress with automating testing of patches

2022-09-06 Thread Christopher Baines
Hey! I think I sent the last message to guix-devel on this topic back in February [1]. 1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/msg00102.html I haven't had a lot of time or motivation this year, but I've still been trying to chip away at this. The recent new thing is that I've