Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> jbra...@dismail.de skribis:
>
>> I just created a debbugs-guix.el file in debbugs. The update should be
>> available on elpa by now.
>>
>> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/56987
>
> Nice! So that’ll be part of the next ‘emacs-debbugs’ package, right?
>
Yes sir!
Hi,
jbra...@dismail.de skribis:
> I just created a debbugs-guix.el file in debbugs. The update should be
> available on elpa by now.
>
> https://issues.guix.gnu.org/56987
Nice! So that’ll be part of the next ‘emacs-debbugs’ package, right?
Ludo’.
Hi,
Christopher Baines skribis:
> data.guix.gnu.org just tracks the master branch, and doesn't delete any
> data.
>
> data.qa.guix.gnu.org tracks all branches in the main Guix repository,
> plus branches for issues, and regularly deletes revisions where they're
> either old or the branch no
October 1, 2022 1:08 PM, "Ludovic Courtès" wrote:
> Hello!
>
> As discussed in Paris, I’m a big fan of qa.guix.gnu.org! I like that it
> shows all the information relevant to packagers and reviewers in a
> concise way.
>
> I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a
>
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> Hi,
>
> Christopher Baines skribis:
>
>> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>>
>>> I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a
>>> bit confused by the numbers in this example:
>>>
>>> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/58186
>>>
>>> The numbers
Hi,
Christopher Baines skribis:
> Ludovic Courtès writes:
>
>> I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a
>> bit confused by the numbers in this example:
>>
>> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/58186
>>
>> The numbers before/after patches don’t match and the lint
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a
> bit confused by the numbers in this example:
>
> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/issue/58186
>
> The numbers before/after patches don’t match and the lint warnings (nice
> addition!) appear to unrelated
Hello!
As discussed in Paris, I’m a big fan of qa.guix.gnu.org! I like that it
shows all the information relevant to packagers and reviewers in a
concise way.
I wonder if it’s due to recent changes since I last looked, but I’m a
bit confused by the numbers in this example:
Christopher Baines writes:
> Since it's easier to iterate once there's something visible, I've just
> stuck what I've got so far on the internet, it's available at:
>
> https://qa.guix.gnu.org/
>
> The code is here [3] and I've put a list of ideas in the README.
>
> 3:
Hey!
I think I sent the last message to guix-devel on this topic back in
February [1].
1: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2022-02/msg00102.html
I haven't had a lot of time or motivation this year, but I've still been
trying to chip away at this.
The recent new thing is that I've
10 matches
Mail list logo