Nahum shalom,
thanks for the information.
However, next time, please consider sending us all the link instead the
PDF.
--
Orr Dunkelman,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If it wasn't for C, we'd be writing programs in BASI, PASAL, and OBOL, anon
Spammers: http://vipe.technion.ac.il/~orrd/spam.html
GPG
By the way, why would they have to _reverse engineer_ the kernel's
PRNG? Isn't it GPLd like the rest?
On 5/9/06, Tzafrir Cohen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 10:44:54AM +0300, Orr Dunkelman wrote:
Nahum shalom,
thanks for the information.
However, next time, please
On Tue, May 09, 2006 at 11:09:34AM +0300, Ohad Lutzky wrote:
By the way, why would they have to _reverse engineer_ the kernel's
PRNG? Isn't it GPLd like the rest?
Yeah, but apparently, they had trouble reading the code.
Cheers,
Muli
--
Muli Ben-Yehuda
http://www.mulix.org |
On Tuesday May 9 2006 11:12, Orr Dunkelman wrote:
According to what they claim, the source code was undocumented, and they
had to work hard to make it into a readable pseudo-code.
It reminds me a time I had to reverse engineer a circuit diagram I got.
Took me hours just to understand what the