Re: selinux policy for haproxy

2009-03-19 Thread Willy Tarreau
Hi, On Tue, Mar 17, 2009 at 09:26:43PM +0100, Jan-Frode Myklebust wrote: Here's an selinux policy for haproxy. The patch is built and lightly tested with haproxy-1.3.15.7-1.fc10.i386 on Fedora9, and haproxy-1.2.18 on RHEL5. believe it or not, I've never experimented at all with selinux.

Re: selinux policy for haproxy

2009-03-19 Thread Jan-Frode Myklebust
On Thu, Mar 19, 2009 at 08:38:36AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote: believe it or not, I've never experimented at all with selinux. Yea, I wouldn't have guessed it, but you're doing a fine job developing haproxy. I'm really impressed by it! So please keep your focus there :-) However, reading

Re: no logging with syslogd under FreeBSD

2009-03-19 Thread James Satterfield
Your ps output shows that syslogd is not running with the flags you've defined in your rc.conf. It's still running in secure ( -s ) mode. Also using -b 127.0.0.1 would likely be preferred over -a 127.0.0.1/32 James. On Mar 11, 2009, at 1:39 AM, Weschmann Michael wrote: Hi, I found the

Re: The gap between ``Total'' and ``LbTot'' in stats page

2009-03-19 Thread James Satterfield
Are you using cookies to maintain client to server persistence? James. On Mar 19, 2009, at 1:16 AM, Sun Yijiang wrote: Raised the limit and restarted HAProxy. No down time or limit reaching, but LbTot is still only about 15% of Total sessions. Any possible reason for this? 2009/3/18

Re: The gap between ``Total'' and ``LbTot'' in stats page

2009-03-19 Thread Sun Yijiang
All our backend servers share cookie info from one memcached server, so we don't use HAProxy to handle any cookie stuff. 2009/3/20 James Satterfield ja...@uberduper.com Are you using cookies to maintain client to server persistence? James. On Mar 19, 2009, at 1:16 AM, Sun Yijiang wrote: