Yes thank you. I figured it out eventually and used the same command as you
wrote to build, but kqueue was still not getting enabled.
This is the make command I eventually figured out works without issues (uses
the default Makefile):
make TARGET=osx CPU=i686 USE_KQUEUE=1 USE_POLL=1 USE_PCRE=1
Thanks Pedro for your help.
Johan
- Original Message -
From: Pedro Mata-Mouros Fonseca
To: Johan Duflost
Cc: haproxy@formilux.org
Sent: Wednesday, July 22, 2009 3:44 PM
Subject: Re: load balancing algorithm
Yup, you can pretty much match any HTTP header, AFAIK. Just
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 08:40:23AM +0200, Rapsey wrote:
Yes thank you. I figured it out eventually and used the same command as you
wrote to build, but kqueue was still not getting enabled.
This is the make command I eventually figured out works without issues (uses
the default Makefile):
Even with darwin kqueue was not enabled, I tried it. Why is there even a
separate osx makefile if the default one works?
Sergej
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 08:40:23AM +0200, Rapsey wrote:
Yes thank you. I figured it out
H Willy,
Willy Tarreau schrieb:
Your configuration is right. I think that your problem is simply
that when you have too many incoming requests, the time to process
them all one at a time is too long for the last one to be served.
No, it seems like it was a bug in haproxy. The problem went
I'm showing connections, and stats for data amount in and out on the
frontend/backend, but nothing for my target servers. I'm on ubuntu
which comes stock with 1.3.15. I removed that package and installed
1.3.18 from source. Any ideas?
OK. Stats started showing up after I established more than one TS
session No biggie, but unless I am reading this wrong, there is
something wrong with the stats code. The data transferred doesn¹t line up
with the systems actually logged in. I¹d think any system logged in that
I¹m moving
http://somewebaddress/test will result in a 301 to the server for which
haproxy should be proxying requests. So the user is redirected to
http://localhost:8080/test.
http://somewebaddress/test/ works fine.
I tried backend nginx and apache and it is the same.
Anyone have an idea whats going on?
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 03:08:52PM +0200, Fabian wrote:
H Willy,
Willy Tarreau schrieb:
Your configuration is right. I think that your problem is simply
that when you have too many incoming requests, the time to process
them all one at a time is too long for the last one to be served.
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Willy Tarreauw...@1wt.eu wrote:
On Wed, Jul 22, 2009 at 11:24:15PM -0500, Dan O'Bryan wrote:
I'm in the process of moving our core traffic from a local datacenter
to ec2, using haproxy for load balancing.
I am unable to get full usage of the 2 virtual cores.
Oh it's not a haproxy issue but a webserver one. Because it detects a
directory at that location, it will redirect back to itself, with the same
URL and add a trailing slash. Unfortunately the server is at 8080 and it
will add that port also.
Sergej
On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 4:39 PM, Rapsey
Hi list.
I'd like to set up a redundant HAProxy server using CARP failover in FreeBSD so
the spare server will automatically snatch up the listen IP and balance out
our server farm. I can get HAProxy configured, but it won't actually start
unless the IP is already bound to the box.
Only bind to the port so it doesn’t matter if additional addresses are added or
removed.
From: Daniel Gentleman [mailto:dani...@chegg.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 6:13 PM
To: haproxy@formilux.org
Subject: HAProxy and FreeBSD CARP failover
Hi list.
I'd like to set up a redundant
Good idea except ... that HAProxy server load-balances for a couple different
sites :(
- Original Message -
From: John Lauro john.la...@covenanteyes.com
To: Daniel Gentleman dani...@chegg.com, haproxy@formilux.org
Sent: Thursday, July 23, 2009 3:23:06 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
14 matches
Mail list logo
