On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 11:19:26PM +0200, Thierry Fournier wrote:
> Technically, the patch works, but the reset of the Lua session was done
> in the stream. This reset is done in the proto_http.c, so I'm not sure
> that's the correct place for this reset.
>
> If the proto_http is the only one
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 06:18:23PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
> > I disagree with making a special case above for maxconn 0. In fact for me
> > it just means that such a server cannot accept connections, so it simply
> > doesn't count in the sum, just as if it were not present.
> On a server,
On 2018/8/22 04:04, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> Hi Patrick,
>
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 06:46:28PM -0400, Patrick Hemmer wrote:
>> This adds the sample fetch 'be_conn_free([])'. This sample fetch
>> provides the total number of unused connections across available servers
>> in the specified backend.
Thierry,
Something for Monday :-)
Latest version of the patch in attachment:
- Filter table format is flattened/simplified
- I've tried to address filter table format error messages
(what is the error, and which filter entry is wrong)
- Fixed one bug: stktable_get_data_type() return value can
> On 24 Aug 2018, at 04:19, Willy Tarreau wrote:
>
> Hi Thierry,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2018 at 09:37:43AM +0200, Thierry Fournier wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Your patch make sense, that's the right appoach, but I have a doubt about
>> the place to use for doing the reinitialization.
>>
>> I add
private keys
private key defiantly need revoked
i attached key to show how easy it is to xtract from coredump
you can download certificate https://crt.sh/?d=511527676 and verify
signature of message.txt using
openssl smime -verify -in message.txt.p7s -content message.txt -inform
PEM
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 05:58:22PM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Willy,
>
> Am 24.08.2018 um 14:53 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> > Applied, thank you Fred.
> >
>
> While you updated the commit reference in the commit message of the
> reg-test patch you forgot to do so in the reg-test itself. It
Willy,
Am 24.08.2018 um 14:53 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Applied, thank you Fred.
>
While you updated the commit reference in the commit message of the
reg-test patch you forgot to do so in the reg-test itself. It still
refers to 7b6cc52784526c32efda44b873a4258d3ae0b8c7 (which does not
exist,
Willy,
Am 24.08.2018 um 04:19 schrieb Willy Tarreau:
> Oh with H2 it's even simpler, streams are distinct from each other
> so we don't reuse them and the issue doesn't exist :-)
>
> Does this mean I should take Patrick's patch ?
>
If you do so: Don't forget to squash in my reg-test (with the
Bump :)
I'm still seeing this typo in the development branch's configuration manual [0].
The original patch [1] should still apply, let me know if you need
anything else.
Cheers,
Arnaud.
[0]: https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/blob/master/doc/configuration.txt#L16133
[1]:
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 04:25:02PM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> Here is a reg testing file for this bug.
Thanks, applied.
Willy
On 08/22/2018 04:32 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Wed, Aug 22, 2018 at 12:46:47AM +0200, Cyril Bonté wrote:
Le 22/08/2018 à 00:40, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
Hi again Willy,
Le 21/08/2018 à 22:55, Cyril Bonté a écrit :
Thanks for the diag. I don't remember changing anything around the proxy
On Fri, Aug 24, 2018 at 08:42:20AM +0200, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
> Here is a patch to fix the issue reported by Patrick in this thread (BUG: Tw
> is negative with lua sleep
> https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg30474.html).
(...)
Applied, thank you Fred.
Willy
Hi.
Am 24.08.2018 um 11:04 schrieb Daniel Schneller:
> Hi!
>
> Thanks for that input. I would like to understand what's going before making
> changes. :)
There is a how-it-works.txt
Hi,
we are seeing timeouts with haproxy 1.8.13 running in http loadbalancing mode.
We are running under high load / traffic and about 10-20k active frontend
sessions. With haproxy 1.8.12 we cant reproduce the timeouts and it seems to be
fine.
Timeouts occure if we are running in threaded
Hi!
Thanks for that input. I would like to understand what's going before making
changes. :)
Cheers,
Daniel
> On 24. Aug 2018, at 00:56, Igor Cicimov
> wrote:
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> We had similar issue in 2015, and the answer was: server timeout was too
> short. Simple.
>
> On Thu, 23 Aug
Hello Julien,
On Thu, 23 Aug 2018 at 20:49, Julien Semaan wrote:
>
> Hi Olivier,
>
> Sorry for the delay, obtaining the core dump from a production environment
> was a bit tricky.
>
> So, I have attached the core dump to this email. I hope this will help you
> identify the issue.
The
On 08/24/2018 08:42 AM, Frederic Lecaille wrote:
Here is a patch to fix the issue reported by Patrick in this thread
(BUG: Tw is negative with lua sleep
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg30474.html).
Note that I provide a reg testing file to test both HTTP and TCP LUA
Here is a patch to fix the issue reported by Patrick in this thread
(BUG: Tw is negative with lua sleep
https://www.mail-archive.com/haproxy@formilux.org/msg30474.html).
Note that I provide a reg testing file to test both HTTP and TCP LUA
applet callbacks used when registering an HTTP or TCP
19 matches
Mail list logo
