Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-23 Thread Neil McKee
If anyone wants me to rebase sflow/haproxy against the latest trunk or a specific release, let me know. Neil -- Neil McKee InMon Corp. http://www.inmon.com On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Annika Wickert a.wick...@traviangames.comwrote: Hi Hi! - sflow output Can't

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-23 Thread Delta Yeh
+1 cent from me 2013/12/24 Neil McKee neil.mc...@inmon.com If anyone wants me to rebase sflow/haproxy against the latest trunk or a specific release, let me know. Neil -- Neil McKee InMon Corp. http://www.inmon.com On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Annika Wickert

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-20 Thread Igor
- Frontend bandwidth speed limit ability. Bests, -Igor On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 4:14 PM, Annika Wickert a.wick...@traviangames.com wrote: Hi all, we did some thinking about how to improve haproxy and which features we’d like to see in next versions. We came up with the following list and

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-20 Thread Bryan Talbot
websocket support extended to include knowledge of control and data frames. It would be great to report frame rate (similar to http request rate) in both directions, proper open and close vs connection closed due to timeout (no ping-pong), etc. I'm not sure if there is a good reason to rate

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-18 Thread Annika Wickert
On 2013-12-17 03:14, Annika Wickert wrote: - accesslist for statssocket or ldap authentication for stats socket For ldap auth I presume you mean the web ui. You could accomplish this today by proxying through httpd (or equivalent). Yes, it’s a possibility but why put another service on a

HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Annika Wickert
Hi all, we did some thinking about how to improve haproxy and which features we’d like to see in next versions. We came up with the following list and would like to discuss if they can be done/should be done or not. - One global statssocket which can be switched through to see stats of every

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Baptiste
Hi, My answers inline. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Annika Wickert a.wick...@traviangames.com wrote: - One global statssocket which can be switched through to see stats of every bind process. And also an overall overview summed up from all backends and frontends. - One global control

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Delta Yeh
1. timedate acl condition, like iptables time match 1. embedded lua script to do ACL and content switch 1. SO_ORIGINAL_DST support so there is no need to config backend server(for sper lazy guy,:D) 2013/12/17 Annika Wickert a.wick...@traviangames.com Hi all, we did some thinking

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Neil - HAProxy List
Hi I'd like the option of a web based api to replace the functionality of the web admin pages with a service which can be used remotely to monitor and control multiple haproxy and provide any fancy authentication and auditing outside of the haproxy service using whichever tech seems appropriate.

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Annika Wickert
Hi, Hi, My answers inline. On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 9:14 AM, Annika Wickert a.wick...@traviangames.com wrote: - One global statssocket which can be switched through to see stats of every bind process. And also an overall overview summed up from all backends and frontends. - One global

RE: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Lukas Tribus
Hi! - sflow output Can't log-format already do this? Sure, but it might be a better integration in the rest of networking infrastructure if sflow is supported. FYI, Neil Mckee has a fork available with sflow support: http://marc.info/?t=13673552702r=1w=2

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Annika Wickert
Hi Hi! - sflow output Can't log-format already do this? Sure, but it might be a better integration in the rest of networking infrastructure if sflow is supported. FYI, Neil Mckee has a fork available with sflow support: http://marc.info/?t=13673552702r=1w=2

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Andrei Marinescu
Hi everyone, Sorry if it's not my place to do this, but I just wanted to upvote Annika's idea about latency metrics in the stats interface. Also, if there's a workaround already available for easily measuring these metrics, I would love to know more. Best regards to everyone! Andrei

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Kobus Bensch
Hi I am new to the list, but long time user. One thing I would find useful is traffic forwarded on the tcp mode on a multiple ip address system, to leave the system on the same ip address as it was received, much like the forward for http mode. At the moment, the receiving system see the

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread k simon
-haproxy is a good tcp proxy ,now it can classify http traffic, and it's cool to classify other type traffic such as telnet\ssh\ftp etc. ? 17/12/13 ??4:14, Annika Wickert ??: Hi all, we did some thinking about how to improve haproxy and which features we’d like to see in next versions.

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Baptiste
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 10:29 AM, Kobus Bensch kobus.ben...@trustpayglobal.com wrote: Hi I am new to the list, but long time user. One thing I would find useful is traffic forwarded on the tcp mode on a multiple ip address system, to leave the system on the same ip address as it was

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Holger Just
Annika Wickert wrote: - Include possibility in configfile to maintain one configfile for each backend / frontend pair There are several scripts out there which concat files in a well-known directory structure together to form a single final config file. These can be used in your init script

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Chris Burroughs
On 2013-12-17 03:14, Annika Wickert wrote: - accesslist for statssocket or ldap authentication for stats socket For ldap auth I presume you mean the web ui. You could accomplish this today by proxying through httpd (or equivalent).

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Ghislain
Le 17/12/2013 10:37, k simon a écrit : -haproxy is a good tcp proxy ,now it can classify http traffic, and it's cool to classify other type traffic such as telnet\ssh\ftp etc. oh pop/imap would be so nice ! one proxy to protect them all and in the light bind them ( eh ftp is dead, do you

Re: HAProxy Next?

2013-12-17 Thread Kobus Bensch
Hi I tried this but it does not work. I use TCP mode because I have https servers in the backend. If I turn on transparent, I can round robin and the LB does not forward the traffic at all. Everything appears broken. Kobus On 17/12/2013 09:57, Baptiste wrote: On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at