Hi,
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 08:25:39AM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> By the way Vincent, William figured that I missed a few patches during my
> long backport session yesterday. I'll have to check with him if they
> warrant another release or if they can wait for next one. Hence no need
> to rush
On Thu, Feb 17, 2022 at 07:57:30AM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ? 16 February 2022 22:15 +01, Willy Tarreau:
>
> > That's exactly the sense behind the word "maybe" above, to open the
> > discussion :-) Those with large buffers can definitely see a
> > difference. I've seen configs with WAF
❦ 16 February 2022 22:15 +01, Willy Tarreau:
> That's exactly the sense behind the word "maybe" above, to open the
> discussion :-) Those with large buffers can definitely see a
> difference. I've seen configs with WAF analysis using 1MB buffers,
> and there the extra CPU usage will be
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 09:57:45PM +0100, Christian Ruppert wrote:
> On 2022-02-16 19:08, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> > ? 16 February 2022 16:27 +01, Willy Tarreau:
> >
> > > Maybe that would even be a nice improvement for distros to provide
> > > these
> > > by default starting with 2.6 or maybe
Hi Vincent,
On Wed, Feb 16, 2022 at 07:08:38PM +0100, Vincent Bernat wrote:
> ? 16 February 2022 16:27 +01, Willy Tarreau:
>
> > Maybe that would even be a nice improvement for distros to provide these
> > by default starting with 2.6 or maybe even 2.5.
>
> Why not enabling them directly on
❦ 16 February 2022 16:27 +01, Willy Tarreau:
> Maybe that would even be a nice improvement for distros to provide these
> by default starting with 2.6 or maybe even 2.5.
Why not enabling them directly on your side then? Are there some numbers
on the performance impact of these options? I am a
6 matches
Mail list logo
