Re: balance source based on a X-Forwarded-For

2009-04-16 Thread Jeff Simpson
Assuming this feature does what I think, then it's particularly useful for scenarios like mine where stickiness on host is used to group users on the same physical box. I've got a video conference app that requires users on the same box to correctly multiplex video streams and provide push

Re: balance source based on a X-Forwarded-For

2009-03-29 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Benoit maver...@maverick.eu.org wrote: diff -ru haproxy-1.3.15.7/doc/configuration.txt haproxy-1.3.15.7-cur/doc/configuration.txt --- haproxy-1.3.15.7/doc/configuration.txt      2008-12-04 11:29:13.0 +0100 +++

Re: balance source based on a X-Forwarded-For

2009-03-29 Thread benoit
Jeffrey 'jf' Lim a écrit : On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Benoit maver...@maverick.eu.org wrote: diff -ru haproxy-1.3.15.7/doc/configuration.txt haproxy-1.3.15.7-cur/doc/configuration.txt --- haproxy-1.3.15.7/doc/configuration.txt 2008-12-04 11:29:13.0 +0100 +++

Re: balance source based on a X-Forwarded-For

2009-03-29 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 07:46:05PM +0200, benoit wrote: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim a écrit : On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Benoit maver...@maverick.eu.org wrote: diff -ru haproxy-1.3.15.7/doc/configuration.txt haproxy-1.3.15.7-cur/doc/configuration.txt --- haproxy-1.3.15.7/doc/configuration.txt

Re: balance source based on a X-Forwarded-For

2009-03-29 Thread John L. Singleton
I'm a little mystified as to the usefulness of this as well. I mean, what does hashing the domain name solve that just balancing back to a bunch of Apache instances with virtual hosting turned on doesn't? Are you saying that you have domains like en.example.com, fr.example.com and you want

Re: balance source based on a X-Forwarded-For

2009-03-29 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:31:27PM -0700, John L. Singleton wrote: I'm a little mystified as to the usefulness of this as well. I mean, what does hashing the domain name solve that just balancing back to a bunch of Apache instances with virtual hosting turned on doesn't? Are you saying

Re: balance source based on a X-Forwarded-For

2009-03-29 Thread benoit
Willy Tarreau a écrit : On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 07:46:05PM +0200, benoit wrote: Jeffrey 'jf' Lim a écrit : On Wed, Mar 25, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Benoit maver...@maverick.eu.org wrote: diff -ru haproxy-1.3.15.7/doc/configuration.txt haproxy-1.3.15.7-cur/doc/configuration.txt ---

Re: balance source based on a X-Forwarded-For

2009-03-29 Thread Willy Tarreau
On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 10:17:39PM +0200, benoit wrote: BTW Benoit, be careful, you left some fprintf() in your patch. Regards, Willy Heck yes, i'll have to check on this thanks. You're welcome. Btw, why isn't this list set with a default reply to the list ? Because I hate it when

Re: balance source based on a X-Forwarded-For

2009-03-29 Thread Jeffrey 'jf' Lim
On Mon, Mar 30, 2009 at 3:48 AM, Willy Tarreau w...@1wt.eu wrote: On Sun, Mar 29, 2009 at 12:31:27PM -0700, John L. Singleton wrote: I'm a little mystified as to the usefulness of this as well. I mean, what does hashing the domain name solve that just balancing back to a bunch of Apache