Re: [Harbour] 2008-05-28 21:53 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-05-29 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 1:48 AM, Przemyslaw Czerpak [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Please try to check which packages should be installed and why mysql-common and/or libmysqlclient15off activated above condition. If I run dpkg -s libmysqlclient15-dev echo ok at the bash prompt it types nothing but

Re: [Harbour] 2008-05-28 21:53 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-05-29 Thread [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ added support for HB_COMMERCE=yes envvar Przemek, sorry for my ignorance, but what bis this please? Thanks and best regards, Toninho. __ Faça ligações para outros computadores com o novo Yahoo! Messenger http://br.beta.messenger.yahoo.com/

[Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-29 11:45 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-05-29 11:45 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * tests/rto_get.prg + Some tests added. + Some older tests fixed and enabled (they made C5.x crash). * source/rtl/tget.prg + Some notes about C5.x crash behaviour. ! Formatting/indentation fixes. %

Re: [Harbour] 2008-05-28 21:53 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-05-29 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 29 May 2008, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: + added support for HB_COMMERCE=yes envvar Przemek, sorry for my ignorance, but what bis this please? Hi Toninho, Some parts of Harbour uses needs external GPL code. Setting HB_COMMERCE disables such code in final binaries so your programs are

[Harbour] Release time?

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi all, As far as I'm concerned we are ready for release. Anything pending? [ tget.prg, teditor.prg have many details to be fixed, but they are working overall, so there is no showstopper. I also have some class level XPP, and extended feature separation pending, but that's not crucial at all.

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-28 22:41 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Przemek, On 2008.05.29., at 2:50, Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: On Wed, 28 May 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, ; NOTE: C++ builds of everything related to OLE2 are broken. Could someone look into it? (hbw32, gtwvg, hbole under BCC and MSVC) It's caused by the

[Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-29 11:45 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-05-29 11:45 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * tests/rto_get.prg + Some tests added. * source/rtl/tget.prg + Some notes about C5.x behaviour. ! Formatting/indentation fixes. % Minor optimizations. * contrib/xhb/Makefile * contrib/xhb/common.mak

[Harbour] contrib/hbole needed?

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi folks, Mindaugas, Do you think we still need hbole? Isn't hbw32 working for you now? Brgds, Viktor ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Re: [Harbour] contrib/hbole needed?

2008-05-29 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi folks, Mindaugas, Do you think we still need hbole? Isn't hbw32 working for you now? Brgds, Viktor Hi, I'm not using hbw32. I use my own ole implementation (based on very old ole code). It is more clean, but less ole features supported (arrays, parameters by

Re: [Harbour] Release time?

2008-05-29 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as I'm concerned we are ready for release. Here everything seems ok. We need probably to decide which are the default flags to use for the builds and the contribs list to include. My suggestion is to include in

Re: [Harbour] Release time?

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Lorenzo, On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 2:59 PM, Szakáts Viktor harbour. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: As far as I'm concerned we are ready for release. Here everything seems ok. We need probably to decide which are the default flags to use for the builds and the contribs list to include. For

Re: [Harbour] contrib/hbole needed?

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi Mindaugas, I'm not using hbw32. I use my own ole implementation (based on very old ole code). It is more clean, but less ole features supported (arrays, parameters by reference are not supported). I see no changes in w32_ole.c. TOLEAUTO_ONERROR implementation contains goto OleGetID,

[Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-29 17:02 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-05-29 17:02 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * source/rtl/tget.prg * ::picture(), ::PutMask(), ::unTransform() moved next to each other for easier editing/fixing. * common.mak - source/common/hbfhnd.c * source/common/Makefile - Removed file not

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-28 22:41 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, Maybe we should just remove the extra user option, and make this the definite default for all platforms where it applies, since - AFAIU - this shouldn't be a user choice anymore now but rather something platform/compiler dependent, and

Re: [Harbour] Release time?

2008-05-29 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 4:29 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe only HB_INCLUDE_WINEXHANDLER for Windows, which could BTW be made the default. I would add also HB_PP_MULTILINE_STRING. Without it valid code of betaX would not compile. I vote a 'no' for xhb to be packaged in

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-28 22:41 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Maybe we should just remove the extra user option, and make this the definite default for all platforms where it applies, since - AFAIU - this shouldn't be a user choice anymore now but rather something platform/compiler dependent, and set automatically by Harbour if needed. HB_WIN32_IO is

Re: [Harbour] Release time? + GPFs

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
I would add also HB_PP_MULTILINE_STRING. Without it valid code of betaX would not compile. Doesn't this break compatibility? Back to HB_INCLUDE_WINEXHANDLER for a sec, IMO we should enable the Win GPF handler by default (without option), and make it an option to pop a MessageBox() in case of

[Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-29 17:37 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-05-29 17:37 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * contrib/hbmysql/make_gcc.sh * contrib/hbmysql/make_b32.bat * contrib/hbmysql/make_vc.bat * contrib/make_b32_all.bat * contrib/make_gcc_all.sh * contrib/hbfbird/make_gcc.sh * contrib/hbfbird/make_b32.bat *

Re: [Harbour] Release time? + GPFs

2008-05-29 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 5:54 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Doesn't this break compatibility? In previous PP ( I guess beta1 and beta2 ) it was possible to continue a line using ; at the end. Back to HB_INCLUDE_WINEXHANDLER for a sec, IMO we ... application, yet the valuable

Re: [Harbour] contrib/hbole needed?

2008-05-29 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
Currently it doesn't compile for MSVC, so in this form, it really isn't up to release standard, so if not fixed, it'd better be removed. My vote to update it. Hi, it will take a little time to fix code style. So, I hope I'll be ready to upload it in the beginning of next week. But I don't

Re: [Harbour] contrib/hbole needed?

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
Hi, it will take a little time to fix code style. So, I hope I'll be ready to upload it in the beginning of next week. But I don't want to be a release stopper. I think it's not bad to continue a release without including one specific contrib like hbole. Okay, take your time, I think we

[Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-29 19:31 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-05-29 19:31 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * common.mak * source/vm/Makefile * source/vm/mainwin.c * source/vm/estack.c + source/vm/extrap.c * source/vm/hvm.c * Rearranged/cleaned up exception handlers. * Renamed OS/2 one to comply with namespace

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-29 19:31 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Luis Krause Mantilla
Viktor: With BCC I get an error about extrap.obj now missing; I removed it from common.bak but then I get obj\b32\hbrun.c: obj\b32\external.c: Borland C++ 5.5.1 for Win32 Copyright (c) 1993, 2000 Borland Turbo Incremental Link 5.00 Copyright (c) 1997, 2000 Borland Error: Unresolved external

Re: [Harbour] contrib/hbole needed?

2008-05-29 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Mindaugas Kavaliauskas wrote: Hi Mindaugas, P.S. do we have a final decision about PCOUNT()? At the begining I wanted to change only PCOUNT() to return Clipper compatible results without touching other things to return to this problem after final 1.0. But after your

Re: [Harbour] Release time? + GPFs

2008-05-29 Thread Luis Krause Mantilla
Viktor: I think what's happening is that extrap.c didn't make it to the SVN. Regards, Szakáts Viktor wrote: Doesn't this break compatibility? In previous PP ( I guess beta1 and beta2 ) it was possible to continue a line using ; at the end. That's OK, but I think we should aim for Clipper

[Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-29 20:20 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-05-29 20:20 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * source/vm/hvm.c * Minor formatting. + source/vm/extrap.c + Added. Now for real. Thanks Luis. -- Brgds, Viktor ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org

[Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-29 20:38 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-05-29 20:38 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * source/rtl/dateshb.c * source/rtl/datesx.c % Reworked to be a bit faster than non-HB_FAST_STOD. - Removed HB_FAST_STOD build time option, because it wasn't safe. It caused reaching into undefined buffers when

Re: [Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-29 20:20 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Luis Krause Mantilla
Viktor: Now it builds fine. Thanks. Szakáts Viktor wrote: 2008-05-29 20:20 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * source/vm/hvm.c * Minor formatting. + source/vm/extrap.c + Added. Now for real. Thanks Luis. -- Brgds, Viktor

[Harbour] CHANGELOG: 2008-05-29 20:56 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu)

2008-05-29 Thread Szakáts Viktor
2008-05-29 20:56 UTC+0100 Viktor Szakats (harbour.01 syenar hu) * make_b32.mak - HB_NO_BCC_MAX_OPENFILES_HACK - no longer used. * include/hbsetup.h - HB_ASORT_OPT_ITEMCOPY - no longer used. - HB_FAST_STOD - no longer used. -- Brgds, Viktor

Re: [Harbour] Release time? + GPFs

2008-05-29 Thread Lorenzo Fiorini
On Thu, May 29, 2008 at 7:38 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That's OK, but I think we should aim for Clipper compatibility as a priority. As you know we have a different point of view about it, so I'll leave the decision to you :) I agree, hbct is the top candidate. Ok. best

Re: [SPAM] Re: [Harbour] Issue #1 about MEMOEDIT

2008-05-29 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Edmer wrote: Hi Guys, I just want to verify if somebody is looking at this issue right now. Try it after: 2008-05-30 00:15 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) best regards, Przemek ___ Harbour mailing list

Re: [Harbour] PCOUNT() compatibility

2008-05-29 Thread Mindaugas Kavaliauskas
Przemyslaw Czerpak wrote: So if no one will vote against I plan to change hb_vmFrame() ASAP and leave any other modifications/optimization after 1.0. Hi, I guess no one is against. Please, go on. Thank, You. Best regards, Mindaugas ___ Harbour

Re: [Harbour] [SPAM] Re: Issue #1 about MEMOEDIT

2008-05-29 Thread Edmer
That fixes it. Thanks again Przemek. Regards, Ed -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Issue--1-about-MEMOEDIT-tp17500311p17548080.html Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ Harbour mailing list

[Harbour] Memory allocation issue

2008-05-29 Thread Edmer
Hi Guys, I have an application which I compiled with Harbour. When I run it, it terminates with a Memory Allocation Report as you will see below. I haven't made any reduce sample yet but I hope the contents of the hb_fm.log could help. Thanks again Ed *--- contents of hb_fm.lob --- Memory

[Harbour] 2008-05-30 01:36 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-05-29 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
2008-05-30 01:36 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/contrib/hbct/files.c ! fixed memory leak in FILEDELETE() reported by Ed - thanks. best regards Przemek ___ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org

Re: [Harbour] Memory allocation issue

2008-05-29 Thread Edmer
I think the cause of the error here is FILEDELETE() function because when I replace those function() with deletefile() or ferase() function the program run alright. I don't know if there is still other function(s) with this memory allocation issue. By the way, I like the way Harbour monitors the

Re: [SPAM] Re: [Harbour] Memory allocation issue

2008-05-29 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
On Thu, 29 May 2008, Edmer wrote: I think the cause of the error here is FILEDELETE() function because when I replace those function() with deletefile() or ferase() function the program run alright. It was, I committed fix few minutes ago. I don't know if there is still other function(s)

[Harbour] 2008-05-30 03:47 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl)

2008-05-29 Thread Przemyslaw Czerpak
2008-05-30 03:47 UTC+0200 Przemyslaw Czerpak (druzus/at/priv.onet.pl) * harbour/source/rtl/hbgtcore.c * removed unnecessary variable * harbour/contrib/hbw32/w32_ole.c * harbour/contrib/hbole/ole2.c * harbour/contrib/gtwvg/gtwvg.h ! use trick with HB_ID_REF() only for BCC and MSVC

[Harbour] What is wrong with the following code

2008-05-29 Thread Edmer
Hi Gurus, Could you please check what is wrong with the following code: *--- start here --- PROCEDURE Main try ? Base try 0 try ? Trying 1 ? Throwing 1 throw(1) catch ? Catching 1 ? Throwing 2, should be deferred until finally 1 is finished. throw(2)