[Harbour] hb_ADel()/hb_AIns()

Hi all, I'd like to propose to change hb_ADel()/hb_AIns() to drop the last logical parameter and always act in the extended way. After all, the name itself already says it clearly that these are extended ones, and it looks unnecessarily cumbersome to use an additional .T. parameter to exploit

Re: [Harbour] hb_ADel()/hb_AIns()

On Fri, Oct 24, 2008 at 12:31 PM, Szakáts Viktor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I'd like to propose to change hb_ADel()/hb_AIns() to drop the last logical parameter and always act in the extended way. After all, the name itself already says it clearly that these are extended ones, and it looks

Re: [Harbour] hb_ADel()/hb_AIns()

I'd like to propose to change hb_ADel()/hb_AIns() to drop the last logical parameter and always act in the extended way. After all, the name itself already says it clearly that these are extended ones, and it looks unnecessarily cumbersome to use an additional .T. parameter to exploit the only

Re: [Harbour] hb_ADel()/hb_AIns()

On Fri, 24 Oct 2008, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor, I'd like to propose to change hb_ADel()/hb_AIns() to drop the last logical parameter and always act in the extended way. After all, the name itself already says it clearly that these are extended ones, and it looks unnecessarily

Re: [Harbour] hb_ADel()/hb_AIns()

Hi Przemek, I suggest to keep the logical parameter working as is and only change default behavior to .T. when it's not passed. Some code may use: hb_ains( aVal, xVal, lIncrease ) and if you remove the parameter then it will have to be changed to: if lIncrease hb_ains( aVal, xVal )