On 8/2/05, K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[KSB] This is expected. XXX^YYY is not a valid VistA entryref. We
need
to find the correct entryref to use for the CPRS GUI client to
connect
to.
See whether mumps -run GTMLNX^XWBTCP does the trick. Thanx to Greg
Woodhouse for
On 8/2/05, K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[KSB] This is expected. XXX^YYY is not a valid VistA entryref. We
need
to find the correct entryref to use for the CPRS GUI client to
connect
to.
See whether mumps -run GTMLNX^XWBTCP does the trick. Thanx to Greg
Woodhouse for
On 8/2/05, Aylesworth Marc A Ctr AFRL/IFSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To check for connectivity first see if the machine can connect by the ping
Command ping machine name or ping IP address This can be done on a Win
machine with the command line. The next step would be to telnet to the
machine
On 8/3/05, Gary Monger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This would be implementation specific. All implementations I've worked with
support calls to the OS to run such utilities.
I believe Cache does handle sockets natively, including multi-listeners.
Is there anybody in the development team of
On 8/2/05, K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See whether mumps -run GTMLNX^XWBTCP does the trick. Thanx to Greg
Woodhouse for providing a link to document RPC Broker TCP Supplement
which led me to look at XWBTCP.m where I found a label GTMLNX.
Ok, I put above into your full script and now
You might want to put the -- run /home/vista in a
server_args = --run /home/vista
You might also move the whole service to another file in /etc/xinetd.d. I do
not believe it will affect the way it works but it gets hard to read if you
have a lot of services.
Thanks
Marc Aylesworth
C3I
On 8/3/05, Aylesworth Marc A Ctr AFRL/IFSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to put the -- run /home/vista in a
server_args = --run /home/vista
You might also move the whole service to another file in /etc/xinetd.d. I do
not believe it will affect the way it works but it gets hard to
NYT - By THOMAS L. FRIEDMAN
The fact that the U.S.
has fallen to 16th in the world in broadband connectivity has aroused little
interest, but it should.
http://www.nytimes.com/2005/08/03/opinion/03friedman.html?themc=th
On 8/3/05, Aylesworth Marc A Ctr AFRL/IFSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
You might want to put the -- run /home/vista in a
server_args = --run /home/vista
You might also move the whole service to another file in /etc/xinetd.d. I do
not believe it will affect the way it works but it gets hard to
If you have further questions on xinetd I found a cool tutorial site for
further refrence:
http://www.macsecurity.org/resources/xinetd/tutorial.shtml
Thanks
Marc Aylesworth
C3I Associates
AFRL/IFSE
Joint Battlespace Infosphere Team
525 Brooks Rd
Rome, NY 13441-4505
Tel:315.330.2422
On 8/3/05, Aylesworth Marc A Ctr AFRL/IFSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If you have further questions on xinetd I found a cool tutorial site for
further refrence:
http://www.macsecurity.org/resources/xinetd/tutorial.shtml
Thanks for the link, first I would like to get the CPRS GUI up and
running
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 02:15 -0500, Zeno Davatz wrote:
On 8/2/05, K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See whether mumps -run GTMLNX^XWBTCP does the trick. Thanx to
Greg
Woodhouse for providing a link to document RPC Broker TCP
Supplement
which led me to look at XWBTCP.m where I
Right now you are just starting mumps which is why you get the GTM promt
Also change
server_args = --run /home/vista
to
server_args = --run GTMLNX^XWBTCPM
I believe this will start the RPC broker.
Thanks
Marc Aylesworth
C3I Associates
AFRL/IFSE
Joint Battlespace Infosphere Team
525
On 8/3/05, K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 02:15 -0500, Zeno Davatz wrote:
On 8/2/05, K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See whether mumps -run GTMLNX^XWBTCP does the trick. Thanx to
Greg
Woodhouse for providing a link to document RPC Broker TCP
On 8/3/05, Aylesworth Marc A Ctr AFRL/IFSE [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Right now you are just starting mumps which is why you get the GTM promt
Also change
server_args = --run /home/vista
to
server_args = --run GTMLNX^XWBTCPM
I believe this will start the RPC broker.
Ok, worked again
Hi
Ok, my telnet connection seems to work now but my CPRS GUI still does
not want to connect to my OpenVista Server on my Linux Laptop.
My shortcut is:
CPRSChart.exe s=192.168.0.119 p=9200
And the error windows gives me is:
WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL
1.0.25.42 is the version of the CPRS GUI.
Thanks for
I believe the server is accepting connections, I believe the problem is with
the configuration of the client and I am not familiar with CPRS, sorry.
Thanks
Marc Aylesworth
C3I Associates
AFRL/IFSE
Joint Battlespace Infosphere Team
525 Brooks Rd
Rome, NY 13441-4505
Tel:315.330.2422
I have to run (I need to be out at the VAMC by 10 am), but at this
stage, here are a few things I'd try (not in any particular order):
1. Verify that you can connect elsewhere (which you presumably can,
at least to send mail).
2. Run netstat on both ends of the connection to see where/how it
Don't you just love the power of the media to mess up the story
but hey, it is coverage.
Wait, there's more. VistA was built on a
database engine named MUMPS (now called just M). VistA is free, but M
requires a license fee. VistA has also been rewritten as an open-source
version called
I found the following at
http://support.ipswitch.com/kb/WSK-19980701-EM04.htm
Question/Problem: WSAEADDRNOTAVAIL (10049) Cannot assign requested
address.
Answer/Solution: Normally results from an attempt to create a socket
with an address not on this machine.
WinSock description: The
On 8/3/05, K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 02:15 -0500, Zeno Davatz wrote:
On 8/2/05, K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
See whether mumps -run GTMLNX^XWBTCP does the trick. Thanx to
Greg
Woodhouse for providing a link to document RPC Broker TCP
On 8/3/05, Zeno Davatz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
HiOk, my telnet connection seems to work now but my CPRS GUI still doesnot want to connect to my OpenVista Server on my Linux Laptop.My shortcut is:CPRSChart.exe s=192.168.0.119
p=9200What's the output of:( as root )# iptables -L -v
Try commenting out what you have at the GTMLNXD tag in XWBTCPM.m and
replacing it with this, then delete the XWBTCPM.o routine from your o
directory and then see if that gets rid of the error.
BTW, you can be sure I was not smart enough to come up with this on my own.
Wally Fort is our
On 8/3/05, Gregory Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have to run (I need to be out at the VAMC by 10 am), but at this
stage, here are a few things I'd try (not in any particular order):
1. Verify that you can connect elsewhere (which you presumably can,
at least to send mail).
I can
On 8/3/05, K.S. Bhaskar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, 2005-08-03 at 09:43 -0500, Zeno Davatz wrote:
[KSB] ...snip...
Still now when I try to login I get:
GTMD Q^DI
%GTM-E-ZGBLDIRACC, Cannot access global directory
/home/vista/g/mumps.gld. Cannot continue.,%SYSTEM-E-ENO2, No such
Try one more time. It is just probably just the code that isn't for GTM
giving you compile errors. The second run through usually goes much more
smoothly.
On Wednesday 03 August 2005 12:30 pm, Zeno Davatz wrote:
On 8/3/05, Nancy Anthracite [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Try commenting out what
I am going to guess here that you put the routine in /home/vista and that it
gets recompiled each time, but when you run it the other way, it is using the
already compiled XWBTCPM.o routine. Why that is probably has to do with the
environment variables. (the second export should all be on one
Aren't MYSQL users by definition fairly technical? Would a nurse or
pharmacist want to read about TCP socket manipulation in MUMPS?
Ruben Safir wrote:
It was not the inundation he was most concerned about. It was that those who
came to Hardhats would be rapidly turned off by the
Hey guys. I started a bit of a campaign on another list
some of you know what list;-)
If you see any helpful objective stuff (without interest
conflict) I would appreciate posting a link that I can reference.
Already, I posted the Computer World link and another Federal tech link. I
Of course you are right. what confuses me is these old-fashioned
winsock errors. Under the scenario you derscribe, I'd expect a
connection reset, but instead we're getting an error suggesting that
the local(?) socket couldn't be bound to an address. That just doesn't
make sense.
--- Aylesworth
Greetings -
I'm new to the EHR community. I started my career in 1995 marking up HTML.
For the past 10 years I have been involved in QA, database support,
usability, documentation, GUI design prototyping, business analysis, data
analysis and project management...the whole disaster. I have stuck
I get this situation when I don't shutdown VistA correctly. When I startup
TaskMan again a bogus task is left over from the no longer correct entry in
^%ZTSCH. (See below. Linux top shows only job 570, not 3069.) I can kill ^%
ZTSCH(TASK,71) to get rid of the dead entry. But that seems neither
Look under the Taskman management menu. There are some options for
cleaning up erroneous tasks. Maybe someone else knows a better way,
but there have been cases where I could find no alternative to
changing the task's status and then deleting it. There is also an API
you can use:
D
Unless something is already bound to that address...
On 8/3/05, Greg Woodhouse [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Of course you are right. what confuses me is these old-fashioned
winsock errors. Under the scenario you derscribe, I'd expect a
connection reset, but instead we're getting an error
Peter,
Thanks for your introductory post.
I'll just say that the programmers on the list are helpful to non programmers
such as you or I who havent become so nearly native in communicating with
heiroglyphics...and there are many facets to a WV meeting.
A recent thread on the list touched on
Or...Crazy as it sounds, there was an attempt to bind to valid
looking address perhaps derived from a host file entry or some such.
One thing tcpdump could do for you is tell you whether there was an
attempt to use something unreasonable (like 127.0.0.0), or maybe a
non-routable address.
the rejection script
--
Nancy Anthracite
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices
Agile Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects
http://www.annals.org/cgi/content/abstract/143/3/165
I haven't read the full article. If anyone get the Annals it would be
interesting to hear what the costs estimates are based on.
--
Ismet B. Kursunoglu, MD, FCCP
Medical Director
Alaska Clinic, LLC
3750 Country Field Circle, UNIT B
Wasilla,
Zeno wrote:
Ok, worked again but now I get the following when I do telnet
192.168.0.119 9200 from my windows shell:
Xdialog error, initializing GUI, do you run under X11 with GTK+
I am new to openvista/GT.M/hardhats, so I apologize if I am being
clueless at the moment.
My take, FWIW:
I
Zeno wrote:
Ok, worked again but now I get the following when I do telnet
192.168.0.119 9200 from my windows shell:
Xdialog error, initializing GUI, do you run under X11 with GTK+
I am fresh to openvista/GT.M/hardhats, so do take what I write with
some skepticism.
My take, FWIW:
xdialog
speakin of X-server,
in order to completely get rid of microsoft-dependency
of vista, would it be possible to use vista on x-window
on cygwin on windows? can cygwin be setup as client
over the network (through windows)? if this works, i don't
need windows at all (sort of), except office staff
On 8/3/05, Mike Lieman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the output of:
( as root )
# iptables -L -v
I do not have iptables installed. Will install it now.
Best
Zeno
---
SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference EXPO
On 8/3/05, Mike Lieman [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What's the output of:
( as root )
# iptables -L -v
gives me:
Minerva vista # iptables -L -v
Chain INPUT (policy ACCEPT 619 packets, 460K bytes)
pkts bytes target prot opt in out source
destination
Chain FORWARD
On 8/4/05, Suchi Pande [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Zeno wrote:
Ok, worked again but now I get the following when I do telnet
192.168.0.119 9200 from my windows shell:
Xdialog error, initializing GUI, do you run under X11 with GTK+
I am new to openvista/GT.M/hardhats, so I apologize if
44 matches
Mail list logo
